Related to this topic: Leaflets | Support | Patient+ | UK Guidelines | Online Videos | News | Weblinks | Equipment | Books | Your Experience | Other resources | Glossaries
Print options: Printer friendly version of this leaflet (html)     Other options:  AddThis Social Bookmark Button (what's this?)

PatientPlus articles are written for doctors and so the language can be technical. However, some people find that they add depth to the articles found in the other sections of this website which are written for non-medical people.

Tumour Markers

These are soluble molecules in the blood. They are usually glycoproteins, which can be detected by monoclonal antibodies. Each tumour marker has a variable profile of uses:

  • Screening; screening tests require high sensitivity to detect early-stage disease. These tests also must have sufficient specificity to protect patients with false-positive results from unwarranted diagnostic evaluations. No tumour marker has yet demonstrated a survival benefit in randomised controlled trials of screening in the general population.
  • For determining diagnosis and prognosis.
  • Assessing response to therapy; 1 tumour marker values returning to normal may indicate cure despite radiographic evidence of persistent disease. In this circumstance, the residual tumour is frequently nonviable. Conversely, tumour marker levels may rise after effective treatment (possibly related to cell lysis), but the increase may not necessariyl mean treatment failure. However, a consistent increase in tumour marker levels, coupled with lack of clinical improvement, may indicate treatment failure. Residual elevation after definitive treatment usually indicates persistent disease. Following tumour marker response is particularly useful when other evidence of disease is not readily accessible.
  • Monitoring for cancer recurrence; in monitoring these patients, tumour marker levels should be determined only when there is a potential for meaningful treatment.

Tumour Markers1

Tumour Marker Primary Tumour Other conditions which may yield positive results
CA 27.29 Breast Cancer Colonic, gastric, hepatic, lung, pancreatic, ovarian, and prostate cancers.
Breast, liver, and kidney disorders, ovarian cysts.
CEA Colorectal cancer Lung, gastric, pancreatic, breast, bladder cancers, medullary thyroid and other head and neck, cervical, and hepatic cancers, lymphoma, melanoma. Cigarette smoking, peptic ulcers, IBD, pancreatitis, hypothyroidism, cirrhosis, biliary obstruction
CA 19-9 Pancreatic and biliary tract cancers Colonic, oesophageal, and hepatic cancers, pancreatitis, biliary disease, cirrhosis.
AFP Hepatocellular carcinoma, Nonseminomatous germ cell tumours Gastric, biliary, and pancreatic cancers, cirrhosis, viral hepatitis, pregnancy.
b-HCG Nonseminomatous germ cell tumours, gestational trophoblastic disease Rarely elevated in gastrointestinal cancers, hypogonadal states, and marijuana use.
CA125 Ovarian cancer Endometrial, fallopian tube, breast, lung, esophageal, gastric, hepatic, and pancreatic cancers, menstruation, pregnancy, fibroids, ovarian cysts, pelvic inflammation, cirrhosis, ascites, pleural and pericardial effusions, endometriosis
PSA Prostate cancer Prostatitis, benign prostatic hypertrophy, prostatic trauma, after ejaculation.
Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)

This is a glycoprotein produced by prostatic epithelium. The PSA level can be elevated in2:

  • Prostate cancer
  • Prostatitis
  • Benign prostatic hypertrophy
  • Prostatic trauma
  • After ejaculation

The positive predictive value of PSA levels in prostate cancer greater than 4 ng per mL, is 20 to 30%. This rises to 50% when PSA levels exceed 10 ng per mL. Nevertheless, 20 - 30% men with prostate cancer have PSA levels within normal ranges.2Fewer than 2% men with PSA levels below 20 ng per mL have bone metastases from prostate cancer.1

CA 27.29

CA 27.29 has better sensitivity and specificity than CA 15-3, and is now the preferred tumour marker in breast cancer.

  • The CA 27.29 level is elevated in approximately 33% women with early-stage breast cancer (stage I or II).
  • It is also elevated in 66% women with late-stage disease (stage III or IV).3
  • CA 27.29 lacks predictive value in the earliest stages of breast cancer and so has no role in screening for or diagnosing the malignancy.
  • One trial has shown it may be possible to detect asymptomatic recurrence (in patients at high risk - stage II or III) after curative treatment.4 CA 27.29 was highly specific and sensitive in detecting preclinical metastasis, and this may lead to prompt imaging of probable sites of metastasis, possibly decreasing morbidity because of earlier treatment.
Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)

CEA is an oncofetal glycoprotein, which is expressed in normal mucosal cells and overexpressed in adenocarcinoma, especially colorectal cancer. Levels exceeding 10 ng per mL are rarely due to benign disease.5

  • ≤ 25 percent of patients with disease purely within the colon have an elevated CEA level. Sensitivity increases with advancing tumour stage.
  • CEA values are elevated in approximately 50 percent of patients with tumour extension to lymph nodes.
  • They are elevated in 75 percent of patients with distant metastasis.6

The major role for CEA levels is in following patients for relapse after intended curative treatment of colorectal cancer.

Cancer Antigen 125 (CA 125)

CA 125 is a glycoprotein normally expressed in coelomic epithelium during fetal development. This epithelium lines body cavities and envelopes the ovaries. Elevated CA 125 values most often are associated with epithelial ovarian cancer, although levels also can be increased in other malignancies.7

  • Levels are elevated in about 85% women with ovarian cancer, but in only 50% those with stage I disease. Low sensitivity limits its usefulness in ovarian cancer screening. The positive predictive value is only 20 percent, translating to five exploratory laparotomies for each ovarian cancer diagnosed. Also, survival was not improved in the women who were found through CA 125 screening to have ovarian cancer.
  • Higher levels are associated with increasing bulk of disease and are highest in tumours with nonmucinous histology.7
  • Multiple benign disorders also are associated with CA 125 elevations, presumably by stimulation of the serosal surfaces.8
  • In postmenopausal women with asymptomatic palpable pelvic masses, CA 125 levels higher than 65 units per mL have a positive predictive value of 98 percent for ovarian cancer.1
Alpha-Fetoprotein (AFP)

This is the major protein of fetal serum, but it is usually undetectable after birth.

  • AFP elevations are associated with hepatocellular carcinoma and nonseminomatous germ cell tumours.
  • AFP levels are abnormal in 80% patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and exceed 1,000 ng per mL in 40 % patients with this cancer.9
  • Other gastrointestinal cancers occasionally cause elevations of AFP, but rarely to greater than 1,000 ng per mL.9
  • Patients with cirrhosis or viral hepatitis may have abnormal AFP values, although usually less than 500 ng per mL.
  • Pregnancy also is associated with elevated AFP levels, particularly if the pregnancy is complicated by a spinal cord defect or other abnormality.9
Beta Subunit of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (b-hCG)

This is normally is produced by the placenta. Elevated b-hCG levels are most commonly associated with:

  • Pregnancy
  • Germ cell tumours
  • Gestational trophoblastic disease. This is a rare neoplastic complication of pregnancy.

False-positive levels occur in hypogonadal states and with marijuana use.10
Following AFP and b-hCG levels is imperative in monitoring response to treatment. Patients with AFP and b-hCG levels that do not decline as expected after treatment, have a significantly worse prognosis, and changes in therapy should be considered.11 Tumour markers are followed every one to two months for one year after treatment, then quarterly for one year, and less frequently thereafter.12 AFP or b-hCG elevation is frequently the first evidence of germ cell tumour recurrence.

Cancer Antigen (CA)19-9

Elevated levels of CA 19-9, an intracellular adhesion molecule, occur primarily in patients with pancreatic and biliary tract cancers, but also have been reported in patients with other malignancies.

  • It has a sensitivity and specificity of 80 to 90 percent for pancreatic cancer
  • It has a sensitivity of 60 to 70 percent for biliary tract cancer.
  • Benign conditions such as cirrhosis, cholestasis, cholangitis, and pancreatitis also result in elevations, although values are usually less than 1,000 units per mL.
  • CA 19-9 levels above 1,000 units per mL predict the presence of metastatic disease.13
Microphthalmia transcription factor (Mitf)

Microphthalmia transcription factor (Mitf) is important in melanocyte development and melanoma growth. It has been investigated regarding its expression as a marker for circulating melanoma cells in blood and to determine the correlation with disease stage and survival in melanoma patients. It can detect subclinical metastatic disease and predict treatment outcome in melanoma patients.14

Circulating Methylated DNA

Circulating nucleic acids may be biomarkers that could be used in the early detection of cancer. They could also be used to follow the progression of patients with cancer. Methylated DNA is one such nucleic acid-based marker. DNA is a very stable molecule and can be detected using simple polymerase chain reaction-based approaches.15


Document References
  1. Perkins GL, Slater ED, Sanders GK, et al; Serum tumor markers. Am Fam Physician. 2003 Sep 15;68(6):1075-82. [abstract]
  2. No authors listed; Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) best practice policy. American Urological Association (AUA). Oncology (Williston Park). 2000 Feb;14(2):267-72, 277-8, 280 passim. [abstract]
  3. Gion M, Mione R, Leon AE, et al; Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of CA27.29 and CA15.3 in primary breast cancer. Clin Chem. 1999 May;45(5):630-7. [abstract]
  4. Chan DW, Beveridge RA, Muss H, et al; Use of Truquant BR radioimmunoassay for early detection of breast cancer recurrence in patients with stage II and stage III disease. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jun;15(6):2322-8. [abstract]
  5. Fletcher RH; Carcinoembryonic antigen. Ann Intern Med. 1986 Jan;104(1):66-73. [abstract]
  6. No authors listed; Clinical practice guidelines for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer. Adopted on May 17, 1996 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 1996 Oct;14(10):2843-77. [abstract]
  7. Tuxen MK, Soletormos G, Dombernowsky P; Tumor markers in the management of patients with ovarian cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 1995 May;21(3):215-45.
  8. Gallup DG, Talledo E; Management of the adnexal mass in the 1990s. South Med J. 1997 Oct;90(10):972-81. [abstract]
  9. Johnson PJ; The role of serum alpha-fetoprotein estimation in the diagnosis and management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Liver Dis. 2001 Feb;5(1):145-59. [abstract]
  10. Fowler JE Jr, Platoff GE, Kubrock CA, et al; Commercial radioimmunoassay for beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin: falsely positive determinations due to elevated serum luteinizing hormone. Cancer. 1982 Jan 1;49(1):136-9. [abstract]
  11. Mazumdar M, Bajorin DF, Bacik J, et al; Predicting outcome to chemotherapy in patients with germ cell tumors: the value of the rate of decline of human chorionic gonadotrophin and alpha-fetoprotein during therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2001 May 1;19(9):2534-41. [abstract]
  12. Bosl GJ, Bajorin DF, Sheinfeld J, Motzer RJ, Chaganti RS. Cancer of the testis. In: DeVita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, et al., eds. Cancer, principles and practice of oncology. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2001:1491-518.
  13. Steinberg W; The clinical utility of the CA 19-9 tumor-associated antigen. Am J Gastroenterol. 1990 Apr;85(4):350-5. [abstract]
  14. Koyanagi K, O'Day SJ, Gonzalez R, et al; Microphthalmia transcription factor as a molecular marker for circulating tumor cell detection in blood of melanoma patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Feb 15;12(4):1137-43. [abstract]
  15. Widschwendter M, Menon U; Circulating Methylated DNA: A New Generation of Tumor Markers. Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Dec 15;12(24):7205-8.
Acknowledgements EMIS is grateful to Dr Hayley Willacy for writing this article. The final copy has passed scrutiny by the independent Mentor GP reviewing team. ©EMIS 2007.
DocID: 3178
Document Version: 20
DocRef: bgp25952
Last Updated: 12 Jan 2007
Review Date: 11 Jan 2009






















Disclaimer: Patient UK has no control of the content of the above links. Inclusion does not imply endorsement by Patient UK.

Advertise on this site














Disclaimer: Patient UK has no control of the content of the above links. Inclusion does not imply endorsement by Patient UK.

Advertise on this site


PS - Health and Poverty

Perhaps the biggest cause of ill health in the world is poverty. Help to Make Poverty History. For example, why not lend some of your money to disadvantaged communities to enable them to trade their way out of poverty through schemes such as Shared Interest.

See also MAKEPOVERTYHISTORY North East for details and links to campaigns against poverty.

^ Top of Page