Experience | Leaflets | Patient+ | News | Products | Other
This is a PatientPlus article. PatientPlus articles are written for doctors and so the language can be technical. However, some people find that they add depth to the articles found in the other sections of this website which are written for non-medical people.
Intrauterine System (IUS)
Post your experienceSee others (17 there)
The IUS is a levonorgestrel (LNG) releasing intra-uterine contraceptive device (IUCD). The Mirena® coil is the only LNG-IUS currently available in the UK. It has a plastic T-frame with a reservoir containing 52 mg of levonorgestrel and releasing 20 mcg/24 hours at outset.1 Lower dose (10 and 14 mcg/24 hours) and smaller size LNG-IUS are currently under clinical development.2 It has been licensed as a contraceptive in the UK since 1995 and more recently for the treatment of idiopathic menorrhagia and as endometrial protection for those receiving oestrogen replacement therapy.1
Only 1% of contraception-using women use it as their method of choice3 and this has remained stable over the last few years despite its benefits and NICE guidance4 that all women requesting contraception should be offered a choice including long-acting reversible methods (such as the IUS).
As a contraceptive:
- Foreign body reaction
- Suppression of the endometrium preventing implantation
- Decreased sperm penetration of cervical mucus and impaired sperm migration
- Minimal effect on the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis (suppression of ovulation in <25% women)
Contraceptive use
- Highly efficacious with a failure rate of less than 1 per 100 women years. The IUS has a Pearl index of 0.18 per 100 women years (the Pearl index of a contraceptive method represents the number of pregnancies experienced during 100 women years of its use).4,6,7 This is similar to modern non-hormonal IUCDs8 and male sterilisation.4
- The LNG-IUS is a suitable option for most women who need contraception with few conditions where risks of use outweigh benefits (see contraindications). Its niche to-date has been as contraception for multiparous women with heavy periods. It can be appropriate for many other women including those who traditionally offer contraceptive challenge such as obese women, women with diabetes or epilepsy, women with migraine and women with contraindications to oestrogen (see Contraception and Special Groups).4,6,7
- The LNG-IUS should not be used as emergency contraception (see our specific record).
Advantages as a contraceptive method include
- Highly effective method
- Rapid return of fertility post-removal
- Reduced menstrual loss and dysmenorrhoea
- Convenience - independent of intercourse and long-lasting method
- Possible reduction in pelvic inflammatory disease compared to copper IUCDs (not supported by systematic review)9
- No significant interaction with hepatic enzyme-inducing drugs
- No effect on bone mineral density (comparable to non-users after 7 years' use)10
Disadvantages include
- Menstrual irregularity common in first six months
- Progesterone-related side effects in a minority (e.g. mastalgia, depression and mood swings, acne).
- Functional ovarian cysts (usually resolve spontaneously).
- Method of fitting may be unacceptable to some women
- Technically more demanding fitting (IUS has a larger diameter than some IUCDs), particularly nullips or perimenopausal women; may require local anaesthetic
- No protection against sexually transmitted infections (STIs)
- Risk of expulsion or displacement (approximately 1 in 20 women affected)4
Non-contraceptive uses
Menorrhagia
- The LNG-IUS is the first-line pharmaceutical treatment for menorrhagia (where hormonal methods are acceptable and ongoing treatment of at least a year is anticipated) and can reduce menstrual losses by over 90%.11,12
- It is effective even in the presence of fibroids, although it is not generally recommended where fibroids distort the uterine cavity because of difficulties with insertion.
- The LNG-IUS is more effective than medical treatments for the treatment of menorrhagia (but trial quality is poor).
- Surgical treatment (hysterectomy, endometrial resection or ablation) is more effective at reducing menstrual blood loss at 1 year but the LNG-IUS is as effective at improving quality of life at 1 year.13
- Interestingly, a recent trial has suggested that sexual function is better post-hysterectomy for women with menorrhagia than for those treated with a LNG-IUS.14
- Cost of treatment for menorrhagia is significantly lower in women with LNG-IUS compared to hysterectomy.15
Hormone replacement therapy
- The LNG-IUS is licensed (since 2004) for the prevention of endometrial hyperplasia during oestrogen replacement therapy.6
- Potentially a means of delivering endometrial protection with minimum systemic absorption of progestogen, given concerns regarding increased breast cancer risk associated with combined HRT.16
- A RCT showed that a 10 mcg/24 hour IUS device (not currently available) was as effective as the Mirena® in providing endometrial protection in post-menopausal women on oestrogen therapy but had the advantage of easier insertion and less effect on serum lipid profiles.17
Other potential uses of the IUS which are currently being explored include the treatment of:
- Pregnancy20
- Recent sexually transmitted infection (unless fully investigated and treated)
- Undiagnosed uterine or vaginal bleeding
- Distorted or small uterine cavity
- Genital malignancy
- Active trophoblastic disease
- Pelvic inflammatory disease
- Marked immunosuppression
- Current deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolus (PE)
- Ischaemic heart disease
- Active viral hepatitis, severe decompensated cirrhosis, benign liver tumours or malignant hepatomas
- Breast cancer within last 5 years (but an IUS may offer protection against the development of endometrial polyps in those on tamoxifen)21
Altered patterns of menstrual bleeding
Up to 60% women stop using the LNG-IUS within 5 years - most common reason is unacceptable vaginal bleeding. Prior to commencing use of the IUS, women should be counselled that altered patterns of menstrual bleeding are common - irregular bleeding and spotting (common in the first six months of treatment) and amenorrhoea in particular. Amenorrhoea is reported in 65% of women using the LNG-IUS after 1 year and is perceived by many as a benefit.4,6
Hormonal symptoms
Acne, headaches, breast tenderness and nausea are reported by LNG-IUS users but in a systematic review these do not differ significantly from IUCD users. Serum LNG levels with an IUS are lower than with oral or subdermal administration of progestogen but there is wide individual difference, possibly explaining the variation in experience of hormonal side-effects.
Ectopic pregnancy
Overall rates are lower than with no contraception. However, if a woman does become pregnant with a LNG-IUS in situ, the risk of an ectopic is 1 in 20 so she should seek medical advice to exclude it. The risk of ectopic pregnancy is similar for LNG-IUS and modern IUCDs.6
Ovarian cysts
Functional, usually asymptomatic ovarian cysts are relatively common and usually resolve spontaneously. Consider ovarian pathology in IUS-users and if found, ultrasound monitoring is suggested.
Pelvic infection
There is a small increase in the risk of pelvic infection which occurs in the 20 days following the insertion of an LNG-IUS. Thereafter the risk of infection is the same as those not using the device.
Counselling
Prior to giving informed consent, women should be given verbal and written information including:
- Mode of action
- Duration of action:
- Contraception - 5 years
- Perimenopausal contraception (where >45 years at insertion) - 7 years/until contraception no longer required (this is beyond the licensed use and should be discussed with the patient and documented in the notes)
- Menorrhagia - 5 years
- Endometrial protection for oestrogen replacement therapy - 4 years
- Contraceptive efficacy and failure rate
- Reversibility and return of fertility
- No protection against STIs (safe sex and condom use should be promoted)
- Side-effects and risks
- Usual bleeding patterns
- When and how to seek help
Screening
Sexually transmitted infections (STI)
Prior to inserting a LNG-IUS, women who are at increased risk of STIs should be screened for chlamydia (and gonorrhoea in areas of prevalence). Increased risk is associated with:
- Age under 25 years
- More than 1 sexual partner in the last 12 months
- A previous STI or current symptoms of infection
Nullips are not at increased risk of infection per se but the potential consequences of a pelvic infection may be of greater significance and this should be discussed with the patient. Where testing is not complete, prophylactic antibiotics should be given to women at increased risk of STIs prior to LNG-IUS insertion. Women may use the LNG-IUS within 3 months of treated pelvic infection provided they are symptom free.6
Endometrial abnormalities
Endometrial biopsy or ultrasound is not routinely required prior to LNG-IUS insertion for menorrhagia.6
Timing
- Ideally the LNG-IUS should be fitted within the first 7 days of a period and is effective immediately.6
- If fitted beyond 7 days, the risk of a pregnancy since the last period must be excluded prior to insertion and additional contraceptive precautions should be used for the next 7 days.
- The LNG-IUS can be fitted 6 weeks after a vaginal or caesarean section delivery.
- The LNG-IUS can be fitted immediately after a first-trimester abortion or miscarriage with immediate effect.
Fitting
- Only staff trained and up-to-date in fitting IUCDs should perform IUS-insertion. Insertion is commonly undertaken in general practice (as an enhanced service) or within the context of family planning or gynaecology clinics.
- For LNG-IUS insertion technique - see IUCD insertion technique.
- Women with previous endocarditis or prosthetic cardiac valves should receive antibiotic prophylaxis at the time of fitting (and removal)
Follow-up and problems
- Routinely 3-6 weeks after fitting or after first period to check threads and exclude infection or perforation.
- Further follow up should be driven by problems or when removal is desired or necessary.
- Bleeding: irregular bleeding and spotting is common in the first six months with a LNG-IUS. Where bleeding is not improving, refer at 6 months, or if menstrual flooding remove the LNG-IUS as the device's mechanical presence may be the cause. A new bleeding pattern in a woman previously with amenorrhoea or a stable bleeding pattern may indicate STIs, device displacement, pregnancy, endometrial polyps, hyperplasia or cancer and should be investigated fully.6,23
- Lost threads: see IUCD lost threads.
- Presence of actinomyces-like organisms: often found coincidentally on cervical smear and should trigger an assessment for pelvic infection. If asymptomatic, IUS can be left in-situ.
- Pregnancy: if a woman becomes pregnant with the IUS in situ, the IUS should be removed before 12 weeks gestation.
- Where pregnancy is desired, the LNG-IUS can be removed at any time.6
- If pregnancy is not desired, the LNG-IUS should be removed with menstruation or if no unprotected sexual intercourse in the previous 7 days, at other times.
- Where the LNG-IUS is to be exchanged, intercourse should be avoided for the previous 7 days in case reinsertion fails.
- When switching to the combined oral contraceptive, remove after 7 consecutive pills.
- When switching to the progesterone only pill, remove after 2 consecutive pills.
- When switching to the depot or implant progestogen methods, remove the LNG-IUS after 7 days of use of the new method.
- The LNG-IUS (and other long-acting reversible contraceptives) is more cost-effective than the combined oral contraceptive pill even at one year of use.4
- It is also more cost effective than injectable contraceptives.
- In the past, doctors have been reluctant to fit LNG-IUS devices on the basis of item cost but cost-effectiveness analyses show this to be a false saving when other costs are taken into account.
- It is significantly more cost-effective than endometrial ablation or hysterectomy.24
At the time of fitting:
|
Document references
- Summary of Product Characteristics - Mirena® (Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System) Schering Health Care Limited updated June 2008; electronic Medicines Compendium
- Varma R, Sinha D, Gupta JK; Non-contraceptive uses of levonorgestrel-releasing hormone system (LNG-IUS)--a systematic enquiry and overview. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Mar 1;125(1):9-28. Epub 2005 Dec 1. [abstract]
- National statistics, Contraception and Sexual health 2005-6
- Long acting reversible contraception, NICE Clinical guideline (October 2005); (the effective and appropriate use of long-acting reversible contraception)
- Ortiz ME, Croxatto HB; Copper-T intrauterine device and levonorgestrel intrauterine system: biological bases of their mechanism of action. Contraception. 2007 Jun;75(6 Suppl):S16-30. Epub 2007 Mar 29. [abstract]
- FFPRHC - Clinical effectiveness Unit; The LNG-IUS in contraception and reproductive health April 2004; Faculty of Family Planning
- Contraception, Clinical Knowledge Summaries (2007)
- French R, Van Vliet H, Cowan F, et al; Hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems (IUSs) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives as effective methods of preventing pregnancy.; Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3):CD001776. [abstract]
- Sivin I; Risks and benefits, advantages and disadvantages of levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants. Drug Saf. 2003;26(5):303-35. [abstract]
- Bahamondes L, Espejo-Arce X, Hidalgo MM, et al; A cross-sectional study of the forearm bone density of long-term users of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Hum Reprod. 2006 May;21(5):1316-9. Epub 2005 Dec 22. [abstract]
- Heavy menstrual bleeding, NICE Clinical Guideline (January 2007)
- Menorrhagia, Clinical Knowledge Summaries (2007)
- Marjoribanks J, Lethaby A, Farquhar C; Surgery versus medical therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19;(2):CD003855. [abstract]
- Halmesmaki K, Hurskainen R, Teperi J, et al; The effect of hysterectomy or levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system on sexual functioning among women with menorrhagia: a 5-year randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2007 May;114(5):563-8. [abstract]
- Hurskainen R, Teperi J, Rissanen P, et al; Clinical outcomes and costs with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system or hysterectomy for treatment of menorrhagia: randomized trial 5-year follow-up.; JAMA. 2004 Mar 24;291(12):1456-63. [abstract]
- Wildemeersch D, Pylyser K, De Wever N, et al; Endometrial safety after 5 years of continuous combined transdermal estrogen and intrauterine levonorgestrel delivery for postmenopausal hormone substitution. Maturitas. 2007 Jun 20;57(2):205-9. Epub 2007 Jan 16. [abstract]
- Raudaskoski T, Tapanainen J, Tomas E, et al; Intrauterine 10 microg and 20 microg levonorgestrel systems in postmenopausal women receiving oral oestrogen replacement therapy: clinical, endometrial and metabolic response.; BJOG. 2002 Feb;109(2):136-44. [abstract]
- Bragheto AM, Caserta N, Bahamondes L, et al; Effectiveness of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the treatment of adenomyosis diagnosed and monitored by magnetic resonance imaging. Contraception. 2007 Sep;76(3):195-9. Epub 2007 Jul 27. [abstract]
- Varma R, Soneja H, Bhatia K, et al; The effectiveness of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in the treatment of endometrial hyperplasia-A long-term follow-up study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Aug;139(2):169-75. Epub 2008 Apr 28. [abstract]
- WHO medical eligibility criteria for contraception (2004)
- Chan SS, Tam WH, Yeo W, et al; A randomised controlled trial of prophylactic levonorgestrel intrauterine system in tamoxifen-treated women. BJOG. 2007 Dec;114(12):1510-5. [abstract]
- Van Houdenhoven K, van Kaam KJ, van Grootheest AC, et al; Uterine perforation in women using a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Contraception. 2006 Mar;73(3):257-60. Epub 2005 Oct 21. [abstract]
- Ronnerdag M, Odlind V; Late bleeding problems with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system: evaluation of the endometrial cavity. Contraception. 2007 Apr;75(4):268-70. Epub 2007 Jan 26. [abstract]
- Clegg JP, Guest JF, Hurskainen R; Cost-utility of levonorgestrel intrauterine system compared with hysterectomy and second generation endometrial ablative techniques in managing patients with menorrhagia in the UK. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Jul;23(7):1637-48. [abstract]
Internet and further reading
- Intrauterine contraception, Faculty of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care RCOG (November 2007)
DocID: 523
Document Version: 4
DocRef: bgp25094
Last Updated: 17 Sep 2008
Review Date: 17 Sep 2010
The authors and editors of this article are employed to create accurate and up to date content reflecting reliable research evidence, guidance and best clinical practice. They are free from any commercial conflicts of interest. Find out more about updating.
Patient UK Hearing Impairment Survey
Patient UK are grateful to the 550 people who took part in this survey.
To see the results click here.
If you'd like to leave your feedback, please go to our interactive forum.
Related pages in Patient UK
Your Experience (^ top of page)
Please add your experience about this condition / medicine
View Patient Experience for 'Intra-uterine Progestogen-only System' (17 there)Health Topic information leaflets related to this topic (^ top of page)
Intrauterine SystemPatientPlus articles related to this topic (^ top of page)
Intrauterine Contraceptive Device (IUCD)
MenorrhagiaPatient UK Newspaper (^ top of page)
Latest Health News
View current health newsRelated Products (^ top of page)
Medical equipment

Books

Other - Useful resources (^ top of page)
Pictures, diagrams, photos, images, etc.Evidence based medicine
Online textbooks and journals
UK Guidelines
Online Videos
Medline
Other good health sites
Want to search some more? Use the Google Search box below to search our site.
Disclaimer: Patient UK has no control over the content of any external links above. Inclusion does not imply endorsement by Patient UK.
Want to advertise on this site? Find out how >>
Here you can follow a link to view existing patient experiences on this subject, or to add your own
This will offer you the usual PDF options i.e. document navigation, search, zoom and formatted print
Note: this is the best way to print the document
Note: this will open in a new window
Note: this will open in a new window
Here you can follow a link to view existing patient experiences on this subject, or to add your own
This will offer you the usual PDF options i.e. document navigation, search, zoom and formatted print
Note: this is the best way to print the document
Note: this will open in a new window
Note: this will open in a new window




