Related to this topic: Leaflets | Patient+ | Medicines | Equipment | Books | Your Experience | Other resources | Glossaries
Print options: Printer friendly version of this leaflet (html)     Other options:  AddThis Social Bookmark Button (what's this?)

PatientPlus articles are written for doctors and so the language can be technical. However, some people find that they add depth to the articles found in the other sections of this website which are written for non-medical people.

Calcium Channel Blockers

Introduction

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) were developed in the 1970s. They are now widely used.Those now available have quite disparate therapeutic effects, indications and adverse effects.

Mode of action
Calcium channel blockers all inhibit inward movement of calcium ions through the slow channels of active membranes especially in:

  • Cells of the myocardium (negative inotropic effect/myocardial depression)
  • Cells within the His-Purkinje system of the heart (impairment of a-v conduction)
  • Cells of vascular smooth muscle (dilatation of coronary and peripheral arteries).

Because the various drugs differ in the relative affinity for these sites, a different balance of therapeutic effects is seen and hence differing indications, efficacy, contraindications and side effects. There are 3 subclasses of CCB:

  • Dihydropyridine CCBs (drugs ending in 'pine'):
    • Reduce systemic vascular resistance and arterial pressure but not in angina (except amlodipine)
  • Phenylalkylamine CCBs (for example verapamil). Used in angina hence:
    • Reduce myocardial oxygen demand
    • Reverse coronary vasospasm
    • Minimal peripheral vasodilation
  • Benzothiazepine CCBs (for example diltiazem):
    • Intermediate between 2 subclasses above
    • Have both cardio-depressant and vasodilatory effects
Further examples
  • Verapamil is very negatively inotropic, impairs a-v conduction so slowing heart rate and lowering blood pressure. As a consequence it is used for angina, hypertension and supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs) but can also precipitate heart failure, cause hypotension, exacerbate conduction disorders and is contraindicated with beta blockers.
  • Nifedipine has more affinity for vascular smooth muscle and less for other sites. Hence it's value in Raynaud's Disease. It rarely precipitates heart failure as negative inotropic effects are offset by reduction in after load. Longer acting preparations only should be used for angina (rarely) and hypertension.
  • Nicardipine is similarly effective on smooth muscle and used for angina prophylaxis and hypertension. It is not licensed for use in Raynaud's Disease.
  • Amlodipine and felodipine similarly do not adversely affect myocardial contractility (with the risk of heart failure) and have a longer duration of action than nifedipine making them useful in hypertension and angina. All are valuable in angina associated with coronary vasospasm. Side effects relate to vasosdilatation and may improve after a few days (headache, flushing).
  • Isradipine, lacidipine, lercanidipine and nisoldipine again are similar in effect to nifedipine but except for nisoldipine (also used for angina) are only indicated for hypertension.
  • Diltiazem is effective in angina and the longer acting formulation in hypertension. It is less negatively inotropic than verapamil but should still be used cautiously with beta-blockers.
  • Nimodipine is similar to nifedipine but has an enhanced, selective effect on the cerebral arteries. This makes it useful for cerebral artery spasm and it is used solely for this purpose after subarachnoid hamorrhage (to prevent ischaemic deficit).
Indications

See related articles on angina, management of hypertension, Raynaud's, Cluster headache.

Evidence of efficacy
  • Angina:
    • Consensus that calcium-channel blockers are effective at reducing symptoms in stable angina.
    • No significant differences compared with beta-blockers in frequency of angina, exercise duration, mortality, quality of life.1,2,3
    • No significant difference compared with isosorbide mononitrate in frequency of attacks or quality of life, but peripheral oedema more of a problem.4
  • Hypertension:
    • Lowering blood pressure prevents strokes and ischaemic heart disease.5 Calcium channel blockers are a key therapeutic choice in the major guidelines for the treatment of hypertension.
  • Raynaud's Disease:
    • Nifedipine and diltiazem are the mainstay of medical treatment.
    • Nifedipine has been shown consistently to reduce frequency and severity of attacks in Primary Raynaud's but is associated with expected adverse effects (see below).6,7,8 In one typical study 19 out of 21 sufferers preferred nifedipine to placebo but 30% reported side effects.7
    • The evidence base for amlodipine and diltiazem is not strong.
  • Supraventricular arrhythmias:
    • Intravenous verapamil and diltiazem have been found equally effective at reducing heart rate at 10 or 30 minutes compared with placebo in atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation but use of verapamil could be limited by hypotension.9
  • Cluster headache:
    • Verapamil is used (unlicensed indication) to help reduce the severity of cluster attacks and there seems consensus from patient groups and clinicians that it is useful. Trials are needed.
Clinical scenarios

Angina prophylaxis

  • First choice: when a beta blocker cannot be taken:
    • Isosorbide mononitrate or
    • A rate limiting calcium-channel blocker (verapamil or diltiazem) or
    • Ivabradine or
    • Long acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (modified release nifedipine).
  • Second choice: as dual therapy with a beta-blocker at maximum tolerated dose:
    • Addition of long acting dihydropyridine like nifedipine can be tried but beware the risk of bradycardia, which is even greater with diltiazem. Verapamil is not recommended because of an even greater risk of bradycardia and a risk of heart failure.
  • Dual therapy with nitrates (if monotherapy gives inadequate control), when beta blockers cannot be taken.

Hypertension

CCBs should be first choice in:

  • Elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension (dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker)
  • Hypertensive patients with Raynaud's phenomenon (dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker)
  • Hypertensive patients with angina (rate limiting calcium-channel blockers-verapamil or diltiazem).

Possible first choice in:

  • Hypertensives of African origin
  • Patients over age 55.

Combinations.

  • Often useful according to hypertension guidelines.

Raynaud's phenomenon

Nifedipine starting at 5mg tds and going up to 20mg tds is the drug of choice.

SVTs

There is as indicated above evidence of efficacy in atrial flutter and fibrillation for verapamil and diltiazem. Their place in the overall management of arrhythmias should be reviewed elsewhere.

Subarachnoid haemorrhage

Nimodipine is used in hospital with close monitoring for subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Common adverse effects

These can be predicted from the type of CCB and mode of action as already illustrated. Examples include:

  • Myocardial effects: hypotension, heart failure etc.
  • Conduction effects: heart block, arrhythmias etc.
  • Vascular smooth muscle: flushing, oedema, headaches rashes
  • Other effects: constipation, rashes, gynaecomastia, photosensitivity etc.
Cautions and contraindications

Again these can be predicted from the type of CCB and mode of action. Individual drug monographs need to be reviewed. Some examples include:

  • Cardiovascular: shock, unstable angina, significant aortic stenosis, bradycardia, heart failure etc.
  • Hepatic or renal impairment.
  • Breast feeding, pregnancy.
  • Avoidance of grapefruit juice with felodipine, isradipine, lacidipine, lercanidipine, nicardipine, nifedipine, nimodipine, nisoldipine and verapamil. This may affect metabolism.

These are best considered under each individual drug.

Monitoring and follow up

This will be determined largely by the condition being treated. Side effects, blood pressure measurement and checks on renal and hepatic function should be reviewed regularly according to resources and clinical need.


Document references
  1. Destors JM, Boissel JP, Philippon AM, et al; Controlled clinical trial of bepridil, propranolol and placebo in the treatment of exercise induced angina pectoris. B.I.S. Research Group.; Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 1989;3(6):597-611. [abstract]
  2. Singh S; Long-term double-blind evaluation of amlodipine and nadolol in patients with stable exertional angina pectoris. The Investigators of Study 152.; Clin Cardiol. 1993 Jan;16(1):54-8. [abstract]
  3. Vliegen HW, van der Wall EE, Niemeyer MG, et al; Long-term efficacy of diltiazem controlled release versus metoprolol in patients with stable angina pectoris.; J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1991;18 Suppl 9:S55-60. [abstract]
  4. Hall R, Chong C; A double-blind, parallel-group study of amlodipine versus long-acting nitrate in the management of elderly patients with stable angina.; Cardiology. 2001;96(2):72-7. [abstract]
  5. Lawes CM, Bennett DA, Feigin VL, et al; Blood pressure and stroke: an overview of published reviews.; Stroke. 2004 Apr;35(4):1024. [abstract]
  6. Sarkozi J, Bookman AA, Mahon W, et al; Nifedipine in the treatment of idiopathic Raynaud's syndrome.; J Rheumatol. 1986 Apr;13(2):331-6. [abstract]
  7. Gjorup T, Kelbaek H, Hartling OJ, et al; Controlled double-blind trial of the clinical effect of nifedipine in the treatment of idiopathic Raynaud's phenomenon.; Am Heart J. 1986 Apr;111(4):742-5. [abstract]
  8. Waller DG, Challenor VF, Francis DA, et al; Clinical and rheological effects of nifedipine in Raynaud's phenomenon.; Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1986 Oct;22(4):449-54. [abstract]
  9. Phillips BG, Gandhi AJ, Sanoski CA, et al; Comparison of intravenous diltiazem and verapamil for the acute treatment of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter.; Pharmacotherapy. 1997 Nov-Dec;17(6):1238-45. [abstract]

Internet and further reading
  • Angina, Clinical Knowledge Summaries (2007)
  • Hypertension, Clinical Knowledge Summaries (2007)
  • Abrams J; Clinical practice. Chronic stable angina. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jun 16;352(24):2524-33.
AcknowledgementsEMIS is grateful to Dr Richard Draper for writing this article. The final copy has passed scrutiny by the independent Mentor GP reviewing team. ©EMIS 2007.
DocID: 178
Document Version: 3
DocRef: bgp24994
Last Updated: 2 Aug 2007
Review Date: 1 Aug 2008






















Disclaimer: Patient UK has no control of the content of the above links. Inclusion does not imply endorsement by Patient UK.

Advertise on this site














Disclaimer: Patient UK has no control of the content of the above links. Inclusion does not imply endorsement by Patient UK.

Advertise on this site


PS - Health and Poverty

Perhaps the biggest cause of ill health in the world is poverty. Help to Make Poverty History. For example, why not lend some of your money to disadvantaged communities to enable them to trade their way out of poverty through schemes such as Shared Interest.

See also MAKEPOVERTYHISTORY North East for details and links to campaigns against poverty.

^ Top of Page