Related to this topic: Leaflets | Support | Patient+ | UK Guidelines | News | Weblinks | Medicines | Poem/Story | Pharmacy | Equipment | Books | Your Experience | Other resources | Glossaries
Print options: Printer friendly version of this leaflet (html)     Other options: See related products available from our registered pharmacy AddThis Social Bookmark Button (what's this?)

PatientPlus articles are written for doctors and so the language can be technical. However, some people find that they add depth to the articles found in the other sections of this website which are written for non-medical people.

Contraceptive Methods Compared

Current contraceptive usage

72% of women aged 16–49 years use some type of contraception:

  • 24% use the Combined oral Contraceptive Pill (CoCP)
  • Woman or partner has been sterilised in 23% of cases
  • 18% of women rely on male condom use
  • Approximately one-third women under 18 years of age use contraceptives, half using condoms and half taking CoCP
  • In women aged 18–29 years, twice as many women use CoCP as condoms (most frequent methods)
  • Sterilisation is used more frequently in women aged over 30 years.
Failure rates

Two types of contraceptive failure:

  • User failure – when contraceptive method isn't used properly
  • Method failure – pregnancy results even though the contraceptive method was used properly. User failure rates are much higher than method failure rates, especially in first year of use.

Failure rates of methods in common use (annual percentage failure for 'real-world' users unless otherwise specified):

  • CoCP ~0.1 pregnancies per 100 woman-years when used consistently and correctly1 ('real world' annual failure rate 1–2%)
  • Progestogen-only-pills ~0.5 per pregnancies per 100 woman-years when used consistently and correctly1 ('real-world' annual failure rate 3–5%)
  • Implants, IUCDs and levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine system <1%
  • Male condoms 14%
  • Diaphragm with spermicide 20%
  • Cap with spermicide 20–40%
  • 'Natural' methods 35%
  • Withdrawal method 19%.
Contraceptive methods

Combined Oral Contraceptive Pill (CoCP)

All contain a synthetic oestrogen and a progestogen.
Mode of action is prevention of ovulation, thickening of cervical mucus and reduction of endometrial receptivity. Also, recently introduced transdermal combined contraceptive, which appears on basis of current surveillance to be equivalent to CoCP.2 Special advice needed if patch off for >24 hours.
Benefits:

Problems:
Side effects

  • Breakthrough bleeding
  • Weight gain – an epidemiologically questionable association4,5
  • Breast tenderness
  • Acne
  • Mood swings
  • Increased risk of venous thromboembolism ~3–6 X that of non-users but much less than pregnancy with actual risk of event very low6,7,8
  • Increased risk of MI – most pronounced in women with risk factors such as smoking, hypertension and diabetes7
  • Increased risk of stroke ~ 2 X that of non-users overall but higher in women who smoke and with hypertension7
  • Slightly increased risk of breast cancer – 1.24 X that of non-users but as incidence of breast cancer under age 40 years is low, absolute risk in young women is small9
  • Increased risk of cervical cancer – 1.31 X non-users but many cases are related to other factors, i.e. number of sexual partners, non-barrier contracepetive use causing HSV exposure9
  • Increased risk of primary liver cancer – only with high dose oestrogen and absolute risk is very small indeed
  • Increased overall mortality – despite careful selection and follow-up, increased mortality at age 20-24 years is 2/million users, 30-34 years 2–5/million users, 40-44 years 20–25/million users

Progestogen only pill

Contain one of the following: norethisterone, ethynodiol diacetate (metabolised to norethisterone) or levonorgestrel.
Mode of action – thickens cervical mucus, reduces receptivity of uterus and inhibits ovulation in some cycles.
Benefits:

  • Reliable if taken correctly, easily reversible and convenient to use
  • Avoids cardiovascular risks of oestrogen
  • Can often be used by women with contraindications to CoCP
  • Can be used during breast feeding.

Problems:

  • Menstrual problems such as amenorrhoea and breakthrough bleeding
  • Needs to taken at the same time daily
  • Increase risk of functional ovarian cysts (~30% increased risk) and possibility of increased risk of breast cancer (similar to CoCP).

Typically used for women who do not tolerate a CoCP or for whom they are contraindicated.

Injectable contraceptives

Products available in the UK:

  • IM medroxyprogesterone acetate (Depo-Provera) – provides contraception for 12 weeks for women who have been advised of the chances of menstrual disturbance and the possibility of a delay in return to full fertility.
  • IM norethisterone oenanthate (Noristerat) – licensed for short-term use with 2 injections only for women who need highly reliable contraception without chance of user error.

Mode of action – contain long acting progestogen that prevents ovulation, thickens cervical mucus and reduces uterine receptivity.
Benefits:

  • Very effective and convenient
  • Can be used during breast feeding.

Problems:

  • Cannot be quickly reversed
  • Menstrual irregularities are common
  • Weight gain – occurs in majority of women using Depo-Provera
  • Delayed return of fertility – can be >1 year with Depo-Provera
  • Possible risk of depression – not clearly shown yet
  • Possible increased risk of breast cancer – not clearly shown yet.

Subdermal implant

Also known as progestogen-only subdermal implants (POSDIs).
Only one type available – etonogestrel implant (Implanon). Progestogen based, single, matchstick-sized rod that needs to be inserted following special training. Effective for 3 years but can be reversed by removal.
Benefits:

  • Highly effective with very few pregnancies reported
  • Long duration of action
  • Reversible
  • Very convenient.

Problems:

  • Irregular bleeding – common in first year but declines thereafter
  • Weight gain is a common reason for discontinuation of this method of contraception along with headache and acne10

Copper IUCD

Currently seven copper IUCDs available, varying in size, shape and surface area of copper wire, and whether they are framed or frameless.11 All require a different insertion technique and should only be fitted by adequately trained personnel. They can be left in place for 5 years, or until the menopause if inserted after the age of 40. All have a monofilament thread to permit check that device is in-situ and facilitate removal.
Mode of action – predominantly works by inducing an inflammatory response in the uterus which affects the viability of sperm and ova. Do not significantly interfere with implantation and should not be viewed as relying on abortion.
Benefits:

  • Highly effective, reversible and convenient
  • Effective immediately after fitting.

Problems:

  • Spotting and bleeding between periods
  • Increased blood loss and more painful periods especially during first few cycles
  • Displacement or expulsion – 1–7/1,000 insertions become expelled, usually during first 3 months and this may go unnoticed by the user
  • Increased risk of PID – in first 20 days only and young at-risk women should be screened for chlamydia before insertion
  • Uterine perforation – 1/1,000 insertions; appears to be unrelated to form of IUD or experience of person fitting it
  • Ectopic pregnancy – only in event of an IUD failure so absolute risk is very low.

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system

See intra-uterine progestogen-only system.
Only one system available (Mirena) a T-shaped device relatively recently licensed for use.
Mode of action – reduces endometrial growth and prevents implantation, thickens cervical mucus, alters movement of sperm and can suppress ovulation in a proportion of cycles, actual intrauterine presence.
Benefits:

  • Very effective, convenient and reversible12
  • Reduces blood loss and dysmenorrhoea
  • May reduce risk of PID compared with normal IUDs
  • Does not significantly interact with other drugs as action is principally local.

Problems:

  • Menstrual irregularities are common in first few months
  • Typical progestogenic side effects
  • Dysfunctional ovarian cyst, but usually resolves spontaneously
  • Need for fitting – larger than normal IUDs and may require cervical dilatation with local anaesthesia.

Diaphragms, caps and the vaginal sponge

Diaphragms are latex, dome-shaped devices with a flexible but stiff circular ring at their edge. Come in range of sizes from 55–100mm.
Three different types:

  • Flat spring – for women with normal vaginal muscular strength
  • Arcing spring – for women with poor vaginal muscular strength
  • Coil spring –may cause less discomfort in some women.

Caps are smaller than diaphragms and fit closely over the cervix.
Both should be used with spermicidal creams.
Mode of action – barrier method and spermicidal effect.
Benefits:

  • Insertion several hours prior to intercourse can allow more spontaneity than condoms
  • May offer some protection against cervical carcinoma, STD and PID.

Problems:

  • Woman needs to be well motivated and careful in its use
  • Spermicides can cause local irritant or allergic reaction
  • Incidence of UTI increased with diaphragms.

The vaginal sponge is made of polyurethane impregnated with spermicide. It is soft, round and purported to be more comfortable and easier to use than diaphragms or the cap. However it has a higher failure rate than the diaphragm and higher discontinuation rates at 12 months, calling into question its supposed advantages.13

Femidom

Made of soft pliable polyurethane, pre-lubricated and with 2 flexible rings.
Mode of action – barrier method.
Benefits:

  • No known side effects, helps prevent STD and possibly reduces risk of cervical carcinoma
  • Can be inserted prior to intercourse.

Problems:

  • Needs careful insertion
  • Can be pushed into vagina or bypassed during penetration
  • May be uncomfortable for either partner.

Male condoms

Mode of action – barrier method
Benefits:

  • Readily available in chemists and non-healthcare settings.
  • Protects against STD and may protect women against cervical cancer.

Problems:

  • Relatively expensive if purchased (free condom uptake at FPCs is low)
  • Needs prior planning
  • Lacks spontaneity
  • Requires cooperation of both partners
  • May reduce sensitivity
  • Can tear or slip off during intercourse.

Natural family planning

Several methods available including calendar, temperature, cervical mucus testing and cervical palpation. Also Persona™ device that measures urinary estrone 3-glucuronide and LH.
Benefits:

  • No side effects
  • Complies with religious beliefs and practices of some patients.

Problems:

  • Requires considerable commitment from both partners
  • Unreliable for women with unpredictable menstrual cycles.

Special groups

Several groups of women have special requirements regarding contraception (see related article on contraception and special groups). They include:




Document references
  1. No authors listed; Is Cerazette the minipill of choice? Drug Ther Bull. 2003 Sep;41(9):68-9. [abstract]
  2. Burkman R, Schlesselman JJ, Zieman M; Safety concerns and health benefits associated with oral contraception.; Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Apr;190(4 Suppl):S5-22. [abstract]
  3. Kaunitz AM; Oral contraceptive health benefits: perception versus reality. Contraception. 1999 Jan;59(1 Suppl):29S-33S. [abstract]
  4. Gallo M et al., Combination contraceptives: effects on weight, Cochrane review abstract and plain language summary, No. 003987
  5. Lech MM, Ostrowska L; Oral contraceptives use and weight gain in women with a Central European life-style.; Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2005 Mar;10(1):59-65. [abstract]
  6. Jick H, Kaye JA, Vasilakis-Scaramozza C, et al; Risk of venous thromboembolism among users of third generation oral contraceptives compared with users of oral contraceptives with levonorgestrel before and after 1995: cohort and case-control analysis.; BMJ. 2000 Nov 11;321(7270):1190-5. [abstract]
  7. Tanis BC, Rosendaal FR; Venous and arterial thrombosis during oral contraceptive use: risks and risk factors.; Semin Vasc Med. 2003 Feb;3(1):69-84. [abstract]
  8. Samuelsson E, Hedenmalm K, Persson I; Mortality from venous thromboembolism in young Swedish women and its relation to pregnancy and use of oral contraceptives--an approach to specifying rates. Eur J Epidemiol. 2005;20(6):509-16. [abstract]
  9. Deligeoroglou E, Michailidis E, Creatsas G; Oral contraceptives and reproductive system cancer.; Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Nov;997:199-208. [abstract]
  10. Glasier A; Implantable contraceptives for women: effectiveness, discontinuation rates, return of fertility, and outcome of pregnancies. Contraception. 2002 Jan;65(1):29-37. [abstract]
  11. O'Brien PA, Marfleet C; Frameless versus classical intrauterine device for contraception.; Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;(1):CD003282. [abstract]
  12. Baldaszti E, Wimmer-Puchinger B, Loschke K; Acceptability of the long-term contraceptive levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena): a 3-year follow-up study.; Contraception. 2003 Feb;67(2):87-91. [abstract]
  13. Kuyoh MA, Toroitich-Ruto C, Grimes DA, et al; Sponge versus diaphragm for contraception: a Cochrane review. Contraception. 2003 Jan;67(1):15-8. [abstract]

Internet and further reading AcknowledgementsEMIS is grateful to Dr Sean Kavanagh for writing this article. The final copy has passed scrutiny by the independent Mentor GP reviewing team. ©EMIS 2008.
DocID: 483
Document Version: 3
DocRef: bgp24689
Last Updated: 29 Jun 2007
Review Date: 28 Jun 2008






















Disclaimer: Patient UK has no control of the content of the above links. Inclusion does not imply endorsement by Patient UK.

Advertise on this site














Disclaimer: Patient UK has no control of the content of the above links. Inclusion does not imply endorsement by Patient UK.

Advertise on this site


PS - Health and Poverty

Perhaps the biggest cause of ill health in the world is poverty. Help to Make Poverty History. For example, why not lend some of your money to disadvantaged communities to enable them to trade their way out of poverty through schemes such as Shared Interest.

See also MAKEPOVERTYHISTORY North East for details and links to campaigns against poverty.

^ Top of Page