Advertising Survey

We would like your input on how advertising is currently used in the site.

Please take this short survey to help us out.

Hide this message

Nephrogenic Diabetes Insipidus

This PatientPlus article is written for healthcare professionals so the language may be more technical than the condition leaflets. You may find the abbreviations list helpful.

Synonyms: NDI, insensitivity to anti-diuretic hormone (ADH)/arginine vasopressin (AVP)

Diabetes insipidus is a condition caused by hyposecretion of, or insensitivity to the effects of anti-diuretic hormone (ADH). Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (NDI) is caused by renal hyporesponsiveness to adequate ADH levels.

Epidemiology

The condition is moderately rare. Overall combined prevalence of cranial diabetes insipidus (CDI) and NDI combined is estimated at 1 in 25,000 people in the USA.1

Acquired forms of NDI are commoner than genetic forms. In patients treated long-term (15 years or more) with lithium salts for mood disorders, prevalence of NDI is estimated at around 10%. It is important for those who supervise or prescribe lithium therapy to be aware of this serious complication and to monitor for it on a yearly basis by enquiring about urinary symptoms and checking 24-hour urinary volumes if polyuric.2 Once NDI has become severe or established in a patient on lithium, it may not improve after drug discontinuation, and so its early recognition is important.

Causes of nephrogenic diabetes insipidus

  • Congenital/genetic NDI:
    • X-linked mutation in V2 ADH-receptor gene5
    • Autosomal recessive defect in aquaporin 2 (AQP2) gene – water channel in distal renal tubule6,7
    • Sporadic NDI with mental retardation and intracerebral calcification (exceedingly rare)8

Pathogenesis

Acquired NDI (the commonest form) is due to the effects of renal disease/drugs/metabolic abnormalities etc. on the renal tubules.

Inherited NDI is caused by a genetic defect leading to a fault in the ADH receptor protein, or in the protein that mediates its effects on the renal tubules.

The defect causes the passage of copious amounts of dilute urine (usually >3L/24hrs with urine osmolality <300 mOsm/kg).

Presentation

Symptoms

The onset of symptoms can be vague and insidious, such that the sufferer may suspect nothing untoward, despite having a urinary volume that would be very troubling had it come on acutely:

  • Patients may experience marked polyuria and can pass urine up to every half hour.
  • Polydipsia and chronic thirst are usually a feature and there may be a predilection for very cold drinks, and usually water.
  • Nocturia occurring several times per night is common, particularly in older adults. Children may develop nocturnal enuresis, where they have previously been continent.
  • Infants may present with irritability, failure to thrive, protracted crying, anorexia and fatiguability or feeding problems.
  • If there is damage to the bladder through chronic overdistension, then urinary incontinence may ensue. This is a particular problem in those who suffer inborn causes of NDI, particularly AQP2 mutations.7

Signs

  • There may be signs of dehydration and the bladder can be grossly enlarged and palpable.
  • 24-hour urinary collection will show urine volume >3L/24 hrs.

Differential diagnosis

Investigations

Check plasma glucose, U&E and urine/plasma osmolality and any other relevant electrolytes such as calcium.
If glucose and electrolytes are normal then the fluid deprivation test and response to desmopressin is used to categorise the cause of diabetes insipidus and distinguish it from its differential diagnoses:

  • The patient is deprived of fluids for up to 8 hours or until 5% loss of body weight – then desmopressin (DDAVP®) 2 g IM is given.
  • The table below illustrates correct interpretation of the results.

Table 1 - classification of causes of diabetes insipidus on basis of water deprivation and DDAVP® response

Urine osmolality after fluid deprivation (mOsm/kg)
Urine osmolality after DDAVP® (mOsm/kg)
Likely diagnosis
<300
>800
CDI
<300
<300
NDI
>800
>800
Primary/psychogenic polydipsia
<300
>800
Partial CDI or NDI or PP or diuretic abuse
  • If available/necessary, then plasma vasopressin levels and osmolality in response to infusion of 5% hypertonic saline at 0.05 ml/kg/min for 2 hours can aid diagnosis. Alternatively, try a therapeutic trial of low-dose desmopressin with careful monitoring of plasma osmolality or serum sodium. CDI patients improve, those with NDI are unaffected and those with PP develop hyponatraemia and may stop drinking.
  • Renal tract US or IVP may be used to assess for obstructive complications caused by the high urinary back-pressure.

Management

  • If daily urine volume is <4L/24hrs and the patient is not suffering from severe dehydration then definitive therapy is not always necessary.
  • It is important for patients always to have access to drinking water and to drink enough to satiate their thirst.
  • Correct any metabolic abnormality.
  • Stop any drugs that may be causing the problem.
  • High-dose DDAVP® may be used with success in mild-to-moderate cases of NDI.
  • In severe cases then other medications such as indometacin, chlorpropamide, carbamazepine, clofibrate and thiazides may be given as a trial but their efficacy is limited.
  • Patients with NDI undergoing surgery need careful multi-disciplinary management with close attention to fluid regimens and DDAVP® administration.9
  • Patients with genetic causes or severe NDI may need to practise clean, intermittent catheterisation to reduce urinary tract back-pressure complications.7

Complications

  • DDAVP® can worsen myocardial ischaemia in susceptible patients; there may be a need for nitrates/other anti-anginals.
  • Patients with diabetes insipidus need careful monitoring of fluid balance and therapy following surgery, with multidisciplinary care.9
  • Patients with genetic causes are prone to bladder dysfunction and hydro-ureter/hydro-nephrosis if the condition is undiagnosed or untreated for an appreciable period of time.7

Prognosis

Outlook usually good once treatment or correct fluid management has been instituted. Specialist follow-up is required to monitor for complications and response to therapy. Patients with inborn errors are more likely to suffer complications as the underlying cause cannot be removed.

Prevention

It is important to monitor for this complication of lithium use through at least annual review of symptoms of NDI and 24-hour urinary volume measurement. Patients on lithium should be made aware of this potential complication and warned about symptoms that should prompt them to seek medical review.2


Document references

  1. Cooperman M; Diabetes Insipidus (overview of CDI and NDI). eMedicine, 2008.
  2. Bendz H, Aurell M; Drug-induced diabetes insipidus: incidence, prevention and management.; Drug Saf. 1999 Dec;21(6):449-56. [abstract]
  3. Livingstone C, Rampes H; Lithium: a review of its metabolic adverse effects.; J Psychopharmacol. 2006 May;20(3):347-55. Epub 2005 Sep 20. [abstract]
  4. Sainz Bueno JA, Villarejo Ortiz P, Hidalgo Amat J, et al; Transient diabetes insipidus during pregnancy: a clinical case and a review of the syndrome.; Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005 Feb 1;118(2):251-4.
  5. OMIM; On-line Mendelian Inheritance In Man. Diabetes Insipidus, Nephrogenic, X-linked.; Detail on this rare genetic cause of NDI.
  6. OMIM; On-line Mendelian Inheritance In Man. Diabetes Insipidus, Nephrogenic, Autosomal.; Detail of this rare genetic cause of NDI.
  7. Shalev H, Romanovsky I, Knoers NV, et al; Bladder function impairment in aquaporin-2 defective nephrogenic diabetes insipidus.; Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004 Mar;19(3):608-13. [abstract]
  8. OMIM; On-line Mendelian Inheritance In Man. Diabetes Insipidus, Nephrogenic, with Mental Retardation and Intracerebral Calcification.; Detail on this sporadic genetic cause of NDI.
  9. Moug SJ, McKee RF, O'Reilly DS, et al; The perioperative challenge of nephrogenic diabetes insipidus: a multidisciplinary approach.; Surgeon. 2005 Apr;3(2):89-94. [abstract]

Internet and further reading

Acknowledgements

EMIS is grateful to Dr Hayley Willacy for writing this article and to Dr Sean Kavanagh for earlier versions. The final copy has passed scrutiny by the independent Mentor GP reviewing team. ©EMIS 2009.
Document ID: 1061
Document Version: 25
Document Reference: bgp1780
Last Updated: 20 Jul 2009
Provide feedback