Related to this topic: Leaflets | Support | Patient+ | UK Guidelines | Weblinks | Equipment | Books | Your Experience | Other resources | Glossaries
Print options: Printer friendly version of this leaflet (html)     Other options:  AddThis Social Bookmark Button (what's this?)

PatientPlus articles are written for doctors and so the language can be technical. However, some people find that they add depth to the articles found in the other sections of this website which are written for non-medical people.

Plain Skull X-ray (SXR)

Headache and head trauma are common presenting problems in both primary care and the Accident and Emergency Department.
It is now well recognised that only in a small proportion of cases are plain skull films appropriate and likely to aid management decisions. In light of the amounts of unnecessary radiation to which patients are exposed by the use of inappropriate x-rays, the Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulation (IRMER) states that practitioners must ascertain that the net clinical benefit of each x-ray film justifies the risk involved in undergoing the procedure.

The majority of plain skull films are performed following trauma to the head, and in order to aid decisions as to which patients might benefit from these x-rays, several groups have audited past results from many radiology departments.1,2,3 From these and other studies it became clear that whilst intra-cranial injury is more likely if there is a skull fracture, significant intracranial injury may also occur in the absence of a fracture,and a normal skull x-ray may give a false sense of reassurance.

Several guidelines have been produced in an attempt to aid the decision as to when a plain skull film may be helpful in both acute and non-acute situations.4,5,6

Assess risk of intracranial injury

The risk of intracranial injury is the main consideration when planning further imaging of the skull.
The Royal College of Radiologists has defined four categories of risk for intracranial injury following head trauma as follows:4

  • Low risk: Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 15/15, no fracture.
  • Medium risk: GCS 15/15 , no fracture, but history of loss of consciousness.
  • High risk: GCS 13-14/15,or GCS 15/15 with a skull fracture.
  • Very high risk: GCS <13/15, or deterioration in clinical condition.
Indications for SXR after trauma

If the risk of intracranial injury is sufficiently high to warrant the performance of an emergency CT scan, then plain skull films should not be routinely carried out in addition as they will not influence management further. If the GCS is 15/15 i.e. the patient is fully conscious, orientated and obeying commands and CT scanning is not going to be carried out, plain skull films should be carried out in the following situations:6,7

  • The mechanism of the injury has not been trivial and/or has involved a fall from a significant height.
  • Consciousness has been lost
  • The patient has loss of memory
  • The patient has vomited since the event
  • The scalp has a full thickness laceration
  • A boggy haematoma or scalp bruise is evident
  • The child is under the age of 5 and non-accidental injury is suspected
  • The history is inadequate
Additional indications for skull X-ray

The Royal College of Radiologists have collated the available evidence and made the following recommendations as to when the use of plain skull films may be the most appropriate investigation to aid diagnosis:4:

  • The presence of a palpable vault abnormality which feels bony
  • As part of an imaging protocol for specific clinical problems after discussion with radiologists e.g. skeletal survey for myeloma
  • Facial views are of use following trauma to facial skeleton or mandible
  • Facial views may be of use following trauma to the orbit, or possibility of metallic foreign body

Skull films are not indicated routinely for the following indications:

  • Headache
  • Possible pituitary problems - ( CT/MRI preferred)
  • Possible space occupying lesion
  • Epilepsy
  • Dementia or memory loss
  • Middle or inner ear problems
  • Nasal trauma - coned views may be requested by appropriate specialist
  • Sinus disease - mucosal thickening is a common incidental finding and not diagnostic
  • Temporal mandibular joint dysfunction - will not show disc abnormality which is the most common cause of dysfunction.
Interpretation of skull films

Skull films should be interpreted wherever possible, by a doctor with specialist training and/or considerable experience in interpreting such films. In untrained hands approximately 10% of bony abnormalities are not recognised. The absence of a fracture on a skull film does not rule out the possibility of an operable intracranial haematoma in head injured patients. All such findings must be taken in the context of the clinical condition of the patient e.g. patients with a GCS of 3-8 and no fracture still have a 1 in 27 risk of having an operable intracranial haematoma.8


Document references
  1. Simon SD, Dodds RD; The use of skull X-rays in the accident and emergency department. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2003 Mar;85(2):120-2. [abstract]
  2. Bartlett J, Kett-White R, Mendelow AD, et al; Recommendations from the Society of British Neurological Surgeons. Br J Neurosurg. 1998 Aug;12(4):349-52.
  3. No authors listed; A study of the utilisation of skull radiography in 9 accident-and-emergency units in the U.K. A national study by the Royal College of Radiologists. Lancet. 1980 Dec 6;2(8206):1234-6. [abstract]
  4. Royal College of Radiologists .Making the best use of a department of clinical radiology. Guidelines for doctors, 4th ed.London:RCR;1998
  5. Early Management of Patients with a Head Injury, SIGN (2000)
  6. Triage, assessment, investigation and early management of head injury in infants, children and adults, NICE Clinical Guideline (September 2007).
  7. Johnson K, Williams SC, Balogun M, et al; Reducing unnecessary skull radiographs in children: a multidisciplinary audit. Clin Radiol. 2004 Jul;59(7):616-20. [abstract]
  8. Teasdale GM, Murray G, Anderson E, et al; Risks of acute traumatic intracranial haematoma in children and adults: implications for managing head injuries. BMJ. 1990 Feb 10;300(6721):363-7. [abstract]

Internet and further reading Acknowledgements EMIS is grateful to Dr Laurence Knott for writing this article. The final copy has passed scrutiny by the independent Mentor GP reviewing team. ©EMIS 2008.
DocID: 2618
Document Version: 23
DocRef: bgp1571
Last Updated: 3 Jun 2008
Review Date: 3 Jun 2010

Patient Experience




















Disclaimer: Patient UK has no control of the content of the above links. Inclusion does not imply endorsement by Patient UK.

Advertise on this site




Patient Experience





Disclaimer: Patient UK has no control of the content of the above links. Inclusion does not imply endorsement by Patient UK.

Advertise on this site


PS - Health and Poverty

Perhaps the biggest cause of ill health in the world is poverty. Help to Make Poverty History. For example, why not lend some of your money to disadvantaged communities to enable them to trade their way out of poverty through schemes such as Shared Interest.

See also MAKEPOVERTYHISTORY North East for details and links to campaigns against poverty.

^ Top of Page