Related to this topic: Support | Patient+ | News | Weblinks | Equipment | Books | Your Experience | Other resources | Glossaries
Print options:
Other options:
(what's this?)
PatientPlus articles are written for doctors and so the language can be technical. However, some people find that they add depth to the articles found in the other sections of this website which are written for non-medical people.
Audit and Audit Cycle
Audit is the process used by health professionals to assess, evaluate and improve care of patients in a systematic way in order to enhance their health and quality of life.
- Audit is further defined by the Department of Health as the systematic critical analysis of the quality of medical care, including diagnosis, treatment, outcome, use of resources, and effects on quality of life for the patient.
- It is very important to differentiate between audit and research. Research investigates ideas whereas audit investigates the performance of processes and outcomes.
- Identifying the need for change may come from personal or practice experience as well as GP contract requirements and PCT agenda.
- A problem may be identified from every day practice. Problems can be identified in 3 basic areas:
- Structure: the input of care, e.g. manpower, premises and facilities.
- Process: the provision of care, looking at what is done and how it is done.
- Outcome: result of any specific clinical intervention.
Any audit requires both agreement and understanding of the whole team, both of the relevance and process of the audit.
- Select a topic
- Decide on criteria and standards
- Agree data collection rules
- Collect data
- Reflect on results: compare with the standards set, identify the strengths and weaknesses, e.g. knowledge, skills, attitudes, and consider potential changes.
- Agree and implement change as necessary
- Monitor progress after an agreed interval by repeating the audit cycle: revise criteria and standards as agreed and appropriate but changing criteria and standards makes comparison with previous audits and therefore assessment of progress much more difficult.
When constructing criteria and standards:
- Make unambiguous statements
- Refer to the literature indicating current practice
- Choose criteria and standards in line with current practice
- Ensure the criteria and standards are based on fact
Criterion
- A definable measurable item of health care that describes quality and which can be used to assess it. An example would be the number of people with coronary heart disease who have had their cholesterol checked within the last one year.
- All audits must contain criteria that should be evidence-based.
Standard
- Describes the level of care to be achieved for any particular criterion.
- A Standard describes the level of care to be achieved for any particular criterion. An example would be that 80% of people in the target group should have achieved cholesterol levels within agreed and accepted limits. The level of standard can often be controversial and there are 3 options:
- A minimum standard: the lowest acceptable standard of performance. Minimum standards are often used to distinguish between acceptable and unacceptable practice.
- An ideal standard: the care it should be possible to give under ideal conditions, with no constraints.
- An optimum standard: lies between the minimum and the ideal. Represents the standard of care most likely to be achieved under normal conditions of practice. Setting an optimum standard requires consensus with other members of the team.
- Identify what data needs to be collected, how and in what form it needs to be collected, and who is going to collect it.
- Remember only collect information that is absolutely essential.
- With the information collected analysis is possible, and identification of any area of care below the predetermined standard of the criteria can be made.
- The results can then be used to develop an action plan ie what needs to be done, how it needs to be done, who is going to do it and when is it going to be done.
The audit cycle is now almost complete, but without re-evaluating the care the practice is giving it is impossible to see if recommendations have been implemented and the level of care improved.
Internet and further reading
- Principles for best practice in clinical audit. NICE March 2002.
- The National Office for Summative Assessment for General Practice Training.
- Gibbons A, Dhariwal D; Audit for doctors: how to do it. BMJ Career Focus 2003;327:1.
DocID: 1832
Document Version: 21
DocRef: bgp771
Last Updated: 18 Sep 2007
Review Date: 17 Sep 2009
Disclaimer: Patient UK has no control of the content of the above links. Inclusion does not imply endorsement by Patient UK.
Related pages in Patient UK
Your Experience (^ top of page)
Please add your experience about this condition / medicinePatient Support related to this topic (^ top of page)
RCGP's Patient Partnership GroupMedical reference articles in PatientPlus related to this topic (^ top of page)
Body Surface Area Calculator (Mosteller)
Coping with Uncertainty in Primary Care
Keeping Up-to-date
Personal Development Plans
Prescribing Analysis and Audit
Primary Care Clinics
Reaccreditation - Current State of PlayRecent news items related to this topic (^ top of page)
Chemists 'to offer GP services'
Return out-of-hours care 'to GPs'
Promises made over NHS overhaul
Polyclinics 'may not boost care'
GPs pledge to fight 'unfair' health reforms
Public worried over 'GP threat'
Super surgeries to be built in London
The Big Question: What are polyclinics, and why are doctors so angry about them?
Check-ups for middle-aged are waste of resources, say doctors
GPs vote to halt Care Record Service development
Less than one in twenty patients use NHS Choices
Confidential patient information easily obtained by phone
Bainbridge warns of need for telecare
Further '£2.65m to extend GP surgery hours
Nurses' clinics to compete with GPs' surgeries
NHS overhaul plans to be laid out
Pick your own surgeon – a new future for the NHS
Minister says GPs blocking choice
Wasted: The millions spent trying to boost Scottish healthcare
GPs 'bullied' into longer surgery hours
Polyclinics 'not a threat' to GPs
EMIS extends online patient record access
Doctors to debate NHS 'top-ups'
Concern over GP skin cancer opsLinks to other selected websites related to this topic (^ top of page)
Medical and Health NewsOther - Useful resources (^ top of page)
Pictures, diagrams, photos, images, etc.Evidence based medicine
Online textbooks and journals
A-Z of UK Guidelines
A-Z of Online Videos
Medline
Other good health sites
Medical equipment products related to this topic (^ top of page)

Books related to this topic (^ top of page)

Want to search some more? Use the Google Search box below to search our site.

Would you like to try our advanced on-line knowledge support system designed to provide professionals with relevant up to date information about recognition and management of disease or take the Mentor Challenge?
Disclaimer: Patient UK has no control of the content of the above links. Inclusion does not imply endorsement by Patient UK.
