Related to this topic: Patient+ | News | Poem/Story | Equipment | Books | Your Experience | Other resources | Glossaries
Print options: Printer friendly version of this leaflet (html)     Other options:  AddThis Social Bookmark Button (what's this?)

PatientPlus articles are written for doctors and so the language can be technical. However, some people find that they add depth to the articles found in the other sections of this website which are written for non-medical people.

Helping Patients Avoid Doctor Dependency

Doctor dependency is a recognised concept, although it has not been clearly defined. As a working definition, doctor dependency is likely when a patient persistently consults more frequently than is appropriate for their situation, or where the pattern of requesting help suggests reliance on doctor or the medical consultation, to an extent which is unhelpful.

Balint recognised that 'the doctor is a drug', that 'no guidance whatever is contained in any textbook as to the dosage in which the doctor should prescribe himself', and that there may be 'hazards' and 'undesirable side effects' of this type of medication. Recognition of doctor dependency is important.1 It can be useful to look at the doctor-patient relations as 'transactions' involving both patient and doctor factors.2

The doctor dependent patient may also belong to the group known as 'heartsink patients' (see separate article on this topic).

Background and co-morbidity

Frequent consulters are a heterogeneous group. Few are likely to conform to the heartsink stereotype. They have high rates of physical disease, complex problems, chronic illness, psychiatric illness and social difficulties.3 In one study, 12 out of 28 'heartsink' patients had, or developed, serious medical problems.4

Possible reasons for doctor-dependency1

Patient and doctor factors

  • Dependency may be part of the patient's style of relating to others. This may relate to the patient's previous experience of relationships, especially in childhood. Difficulties with past or parental relationships may be re-enacted in the consultation. For example, Norton and Smith describe a frequently attending patient who behaved in a way that made his doctors feel increasingly angry and unsympathetic towards him. It transpired that as a child, his parents had been very unsympathetic towards illness. Unconsciously, this patient and his doctors were re-enacting his parent's role.2
  • Doctors may like power or need to be needed. As with patients, the doctor's past experiences and psychodynamic factors play a part.2
  • Dislike of change or confrontation: allowing dependency may seem easier than trying to help the patient be more assertive.
  • The doctor and patient may be emotionally attached or involved with one another.
  • Loneliness may increase the consultation frequency.5

Dynamics of the doctor-patient relationship

The dynamics of interpersonal relationships were explored by Eric Berne over 40 years ago in his book Games People Play.6 He classified relationships into 3 types:

  • Parent - taking control and making decisions
  • Child - submissive and letting others make decisions
  • Adult - being autonomous

The doctor may need to promote an adult/adult relationship, rather than (for example) a parent/child relationship which the patient has tried to foster. It helps to understand the benefits gained by the patient in assuming the child role, and also the benefits to the doctor that allowed it to develop. Either or both parties may have been unaware that this relationship was developing.

Social and cultural factors

  • Medicalisation: doctors encourage dependency if they 'medicalise' self limiting or psychosocial problems. Issuing unnecessary prescriptions, eg. for antibiotics or tranquillisers, may encourage patients to re-attend or to view their problem as requiring a doctor. Research suggests that many patients don't want a prescription anyway.7,8
  • Family patterns: illness behaviour is learned within families, and most GPs recognise that some families are frequent consulters.
  • Cultural influences: these affect the presentation of illness and the role of the doctor and patient. They may play a part in doctor-dependency, especially if cultural issues promote misunderstandings. For example, in some cultures, psychological illness or other problems such as epilepsy or rape, are considered shameful and will tend to be hidden. This may lead to somatisation or hidden agendas, both of which contribute to doctor dependency.

Medical and diagnostic factors

Undiagnosed, unacknowledged or under-treated problems can make patients appear as doctor-dependent when they are, in fact, appropriately seeking help.

  • Both physical and psychological problems may go unrecognised: for example, hypothyroidism and depression can present with subtle, insidious symptoms; anxiety or depression may present with somatisation.
  • Some patients find it very difficult to openly request help with psychological problems. Often it is because they come from a family or culture where this type of problem is not seen as a legitimate reason to ask for help.
  • As examples: Danzig describes the 'patient journey' of a man who had undiagnosed acromegaly for 10 years, despite seeing several doctors. He was a frequent attender and 'challenging patient' whose GP had a 'drawer full of his notes' Later, after the diagnosis, the doctor-patient relationship developed into a true partnership.9 Davis describes a patient whose many physical symptoms were dismissed, but who most likely needed help with anxiety.10
Recognising the problem1

'Symptoms' for concern are:

  • Frequent consultations for minor problems.
  • Regular consultations with little content or same content .
  • The patient won't see another doctor/nurse, or has no faith in external advice eg. a specialist.
  • Strong feelings on the doctor's part (negative or positive), on seeing that the patient is on their appointment list.
  • Refusal to terminate treatment or the consultation.
  • Gifts or excessive positive feedback.
  • Persistent symptoms without any identifiable pathology or aetiology, despite extensive examination and investigations.
Management1

Possible strategies include:

Gaining insight

According to an RCGP workshop, there is a triad of factors involved in every difficult patient's case: the doctor, the patient and the interaction between the two. Insight into the situation is facilitated by regular review and discussion with others outside the relationship.11 Norton and Smith agree, and propose a framework for evaluating the doctor-patient transactions, using their 'transactional window'.2

Teamwork and management plans2

A case discussion with colleagues or other members of the team can help in various ways: it can provide insight (as above); the group can plan a management strategy, and the team can support one another in implementing it. A study in one practice involved regular meetings to discuss 'heartsink' patients, many of whom were frequent attenders. This was followed by a reduction in the consultation rate, and other improvements.4

Promoting patients' self-care and coping skills

This includes:

  • Education, for example, reducing antibiotic prescribing, educating patients about minor illness, using deferred prescriptions, offering information leaflets or discussion instead of a prescription.
  • Improving life skills, e.g. through counselling or cognitive behavioural therapy.

Information management

Summarizing the patient's notes is often suggested, and may be helpful in understanding the patient. However, one study found that this in itself did not affect the frequency of attendance.12

Ideas for use in practice1,2

Ask yourself:

  • Why do I dread/look forward to seeing this patient?
  • Where are my feelings coming from?
  • It is useful to think of different styles of relating to others: parent/child, adult/child or adult/adult.6 Think of yourself and the patient. Who is behaving as the adult, child or parent and why?
  • What else is going on in the patient's world (home, family, work, past life, culture)?

Discussion with colleagues:

  • Involve other members of the team, practice meetings, a mentor or a learning group.
  • In very complex cases, it can help to have a meeting between all the professionals involved with the patient, both primary and secondary care staff.

Tools and strategies for moving forward:

  • Explore a hidden agenda: 'Was there something else you wanted to ask me about?' 'How are things at home/work..?'
  • Look for depression and anxiety; use a depression screening tool if in doubt.
  • Flag up the situation in a non-judgemental way: 'Do you know I have seen you 24 times in the last 6 months?' 'I seem to have been seeing an awful lot of you lately and yet you do not seem to be getting any better...'
  • Explore reasons: 'I wonder if...'
  • Share responsibility: 'I can tell you what the alternatives are but the final decision has to be yours. You are the one who has to live with it and I cannot live your life for you.'
  • Set limits and agree a management plan: negotiate, agree specific goals, appointment times, what will or will not be covered outside of this plan (eg. emergencies).
  • Encourage self care and non-prescriptive interventions when appropriate. Remember that listening, active acknowledgement of distress and information giving (verbal or leaflet) are interventions too.7

Pitfalls to avoid:

  • Is a physical or mental illness being missed?
    • Beware the patient with 'thin notes' who suddenly starts to consult often: this change in pattern may signify a genuine illness
    • Patients with 'thick notes' can also have or develop serious illness,4 which is more difficult to spot because of their usual illness behaviour.
  • 'Everyone's and no-one's problem', or the 'collusion of anonymity' - a number of doctors involved but no-one responsible for decisions.
  • Different members of the team undermining one another.
  • Burnout. You can't help patients if you are exhausted. Use stress management techniques and housekeeping.13 GPs also need to accept that some patients may remain dependent, whatever the doctor does.

Prognosis

The history of frequent consulting behavior seems to persist in many cases.3However, both anecdotally and in one study, discussions of difficult patients with colleagues did reduce consultation rates or improve the doctor-patient relationship.2,4


Document references
  1. Cheek B; Patient dependency - or is it doctor dependency? gp-training.net Updated December 2006.; This is general practice resource website written by Dr Brad Cheek, a GP Trainer in Cumbria, UK
  2. Norton, K and Smith, S. Problems with Patients: Managing Complcated Transactions. Cambridge University Press 1994. 160pp. ISBN 0 521 43628 1; Not light reading, but thought-provoking. The case histories and discussion around them are illuminating. Uses psychodynamic theory and a 'transactional window' concept to look at ways in which the doctor and patient's personal factors influence the consulltation.
  3. Gill D, Sharpe M; Frequent consulters in general practice: a systematic review of studies of prevalence, associations and outcome. J Psychosom Res. 1999 Aug;47(2):115-30. [abstract]
  4. O'Dowd TC; Five years of heartsink patients in general practice. BMJ. 1988 Aug 20-27;297(6647):528-30. [abstract]
  5. Ellaway A, Wood S, Macintyre S; Someone to talk to? The role of loneliness as a factor in the frequency of GP consultations. Br J Gen Pract. 1999 May;49(442):363-7. [abstract]
  6. Games people play. Eric Berne.; Penguin Books 1964
  7. Ring A, Dowrick C, Humphris G, et al; Do patients with unexplained physical symptoms pressurise general practitioners for somatic treatment? A qualitative study. BMJ. 2004 May 1;328(7447):1057. Epub 2004 Mar 31. [abstract]
  8. Barry CA, Bradley CP, Britten N, et al; Patients' unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations: qualitative study. BMJ. 2000 May 6;320(7244):1246-50. [abstract]
  9. Danzig J; Acromegaly. BMJ. 2007 Oct 20;335(7624):824-5.
  10. Davis H; Psychiatric problem dismissed BMJ. 1998 May 16;316(7143):1506.
  11. Corney RH, Strathdee G, Higgs R et al; Managing the difficult patient: practical suggestions from a study day. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, August 1988. 349-352.
  12. Jiwa M; Frequent attenders in general practice: an attempt to reduce attendance. Fam Pract. 2000 Jun;17(3):248-51. [abstract]
  13. Neighbour R. The inner consultation: How to Develop an Effective and Intuitive Consulting Style. 2nd ed. Radcliffe Medical Press. 2004

Internet and further reading
  • Righter EL, Sansone RA; Managing somatic preoccupation. Am Fam Physician. 1999 Jun;59(11):3113-20. [abstract]
  • Platt, FW and Gordon, GH. Field Guide to the Difficult Patient Interview. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 2004. 250pp. ISBN 0 7817 2044 3; A readable handbook to aid doctor-patient communication, with helpful snippets of imaginary consulting room conversations.
Acknowledgements EMIS is grateful to Dr N Hartree for writing this article. The final copy has passed scrutiny by the independent Mentor GP reviewing team. ©EMIS 2008.
DocID: 2249
Document Version: 20
DocRef: bgp597
Last Updated: 7 Feb 2008
Review Date: 6 Feb 2010






















Disclaimer: Patient UK has no control of the content of the above links. Inclusion does not imply endorsement by Patient UK.

Advertise on this site




Patient Experience





Disclaimer: Patient UK has no control of the content of the above links. Inclusion does not imply endorsement by Patient UK.

Advertise on this site


PS - Health and Poverty

Perhaps the biggest cause of ill health in the world is poverty. Help to Make Poverty History. For example, why not lend some of your money to disadvantaged communities to enable them to trade their way out of poverty through schemes such as Shared Interest.

See also MAKEPOVERTYHISTORY North East for details and links to campaigns against poverty.

^ Top of Page