Advertising Survey

We would like your input on how advertising is currently used in the site.

Please take this short survey to help us out.

Hide this message

Croup

This PatientPlus article is written for healthcare professionals so the language may be more technical than the condition leaflets. You may find the abbreviations list helpful.

Synonyms: acute laryngotracheitis, acute laryngotracheobronchitis

Croup is a common childhood illness caused by inflammation of the upper respiratory tract (predominantly the larynx and trachea, but it may affect the bronchi) as a result of viral infection.


Some consider that the term croup should not be used to describe illness affecting the bronchi, as there is a higher likelihood of secondary bacterial infection in such cases.

Croup tends to be relatively mild and self-limiting, but can cause distressing symptoms such as a barking cough and stridor that may prompt parents to bring their child to their GP or local emergency department. Severe cases may compromise the upper airway and so the condition of the child needs to be assessed carefully and other causes of upper airway obstruction (such as inhaled foreign body and epiglottitis) must be considered and excluded.

Pathophysiology

  • Viral upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) causes nasopharyngeal inflammation that may spread to the larynx and trachea causing subglottal inflammation, oedema and compromise of the airway at its narrowest portion.
  • The movement of the vocal cords is impaired leading to the characteristic cough. Occasionally, fibrinous exudation with pseudomembrane formation may occur, causing further airway compromise.
  • It is thought that some children who suffer recurrent bouts of spasmodic croup have a primarily allergic rather than infective aetiology for subglottal oedema.1

Causative organisms

Epidemiology

  • Croup most often affects children aged 6 months to 3 years, with a peak incidence during the second year of life. However, children as young as 3 months of age, or adolescents and, very rarely, adults can be affected.2
  • The annual incidence is variable depending on the cyclical prevalence of viral infection (particularly parainfluenza virus) in children.3
  • Peak incidence occurs in children aged 1-2 years and is around 60 per 1,000 child years.4
  • Long-term studies show an annual prevalence averaging at about 3% in those aged <6 years.5

Risk factors

  • Male:female preponderance is about 1.5-2:1.1
  • Most common in those aged 6 months to 3 years.
  • Rare in those older than 6 years of age, but can affect some children up to the early teenage years.
  • Most prevalent in autumn and spring.

Presentation

Symptoms

Croup normally starts with nonspecific symptoms of viral URTI, such as runny nose, sore throat, fever and cough:

  • This progresses over the course of a couple of days to include the characteristic barking cough (some describe it as akin to the noise of a seal) and hoarseness. These symptoms tend to be worse at night.
  • Stridor develops, sometimes suddenly, as the narrowing of the subglottal airways crosses a threshold at which airflow compromise begins.
  • Parents may notice that their child is struggling to breathe and this, understandably, may prompt them to bring their child to their local out-of-hours GP service or emergency department.
  • The illness tends to last for about 3-7 days but can persist for up to 2 weeks.

Signs

  • There is a high degree of variability in clinical findings.
  • It is unusual for the child to appear 'septic' or 'toxic'.
  • Check vital signs (including temperature, pulse and blood pressure) and put on pulse oximeter - tachycardia is often present, hypotension is a sign of severe illness.
  • There may be a mild-to-moderate fever.
  • A barking cough and hoarse cry are nearly always present.
  • Stridor (defined as a harsh, low-pitched noise heard during inspiration) may be heard at rest or only when the child is agitated or active.
  • Respiratory distress with marked tachypnoea and intercostal recession may be noted.
  • Be wary of the child with respiratory distress, but only quiet stridor, as this may indicate a severe case where the degree of airway-narrowing is so bad as to limit air movement and hence decrease the volume of the noise.
  • Chest sounds are usually normal but can be decreased in volume where there is severe airflow limitation.
  • Drowsiness, lethargy, cyanosis and intercostal recession that disappears despite increasing respiratory distress should be considered as red flags for impending respiratory failure.
  • A low SaO2 on pulse oximetry (<95%) indicates significant respiratory impairment.

Differential diagnosis

Investigations

  • The diagnosis is usually made on clinical grounds and blood tests add little.
  • FBC may reveal a viral pattern differential white cell count, but is rather nonspecific.
  • Viral titres are used on occasion to decide whether patients should be treated in isolation, or to indicate a need for antiviral therapy in the case of influenza A.
  • Plain CXR can exclude other causes such as inhaled foreign body, epiglottitis, bacterial tracheitis or retropharyngeal abscess.
  • Postero-anterior CXR, including the neck area, may reveal the 'steeple sign':
    • This is the presence of a steeple-shaped narrowing of the darker area caused by air in the upper trachea, revealing the subglottal narrowing of the airway.
    • Follow the link to the next reference for an image of this sign.1
    • Lateral neck radiographs may also be employed to demonstrate a distended hypopharynx during inspiration.6
  • These radiological tests are not very specific or sensitive, with a significant false-positive rate, and up to 50% of croup sufferers do not have these findings.
  • Direct or indirect laryngoscopy is not usually required but may be employed where the course of the illness is atypical or there is reason to suspect a congenital or other alternative cause for upper airway stenosis.

Staging

There are many clinical scoring systems for croup. The most commonly cited is the Westley clinical scoring system which classifies cases into mild, moderate or severe.7

It appears to be useful as a research tool to assess the efficacy of interventions, but there is little proof of its clinical usefulness.1 The classification of symptoms it uses can be subjective and open to inter- and intra-observer variation.
An overall assessment of the patient's condition, taking into account the red flags listed above, SaO2 readings and the degree of respiratory distress may be an equivalent and simpler guide to deciding what therapy is required.

The modified Westley clinical scoring system for croup

  • Inspiratory stridor:
    • Not present - 0 points.
    • When agitated/active - 1 point.
    • At rest - 2 points.
  • Intercostal recession:
    • Mild - 1 point.
    • Moderate - 2 points.
    • Severe - 3 points.
  • Air entry:
    • Normal - 0 points.
    • Mildly decreased - 1 point.
    • Severely decreased - 2 points.
  • Cyanosis:
    • None - 0 points.
    • With agitation/activity - 4 points.
    • At rest - 5 points.
  • Level of consciousness:
    • Normal - 0 points.
    • Altered - 5 points.

Possible score 0-17: <4 = mild croup, 4-6 = moderate croup, >6 =severe croup.

Management

  • Do not give antibiotics unless there are sound clinical reasons to suspect secondary bacterial infection.
    Keep the child as calm and as comfortable as possible. Allow the child to remain in a parent's arms and avoid any unnecessary painful interventions. Persistent crying increases oxygen demands and respiratory muscle fatigue and worsens the obstruction.1
  • Use paracetamol or ibuprofen to control fever.
  • Ensure an adequate fluid intake.
  • Do not advise humidified air (e.g. steam inhalation).2 A systematic review of its efficacy in secondary-care emergency settings has not shown any evidence of benefit.4
  • Inpatient care includes oxygen therapy if required to maintain SaO2 above 93%.

CROUP FLOW (OM532a.jpg)

Steroids

Systematic reviews of the use of systemic dexamethasone and nebulised budesonide have shown that they are effective in relieving the symptoms of croup as early as six hours after treatment:8 Treated patients have fewer re-attendances or hospital admissions, and those who are admitted require shorter inpatient stays. Dexamethasone appears to be effective in mild cases as well as in those that have moderate or severe croup.9

  • Mild croup is largely self-limiting, but treatment with a single dose of a corticosteroid (e.g. dexamethasone 150 micrograms/kg) by mouth may be of benefit.10
  • More severe croup (or mild croup that might cause complications) requires hospital admission. A single dose of a corticosteroid (e.g. dexamethasone 150 micrograms/kg or prednisolone 1-2 mg/kg by mouth) should be administered before transfer to hospital.10
  • In hospital, dexamethasone 150 micrograms/kg (by mouth or by injection) or budesonide 2 mg (by nebuliser) will often reduce symptoms. The dose may need to be repeated after 12 hours if necessary.10

Epinephrine1

  • Nebulised epinephrine (adrenaline) is usually reserved for patients in moderate-to-severe distress.
  • Nebulised epinephrine solution 1 in 1,000 (1 mg/mL) should be given with close clinical monitoring in a dose of 400 micrograms/kg (maximum 5 mg) repeated after 30 minutes if necessary.10
  • The effects of nebulised epinephrine last 2-3 hours and the child needs to be monitored carefully for any recurrence of the obstruction.10

Complications1

Prognosis

  • Complications are generally rare and case series show that <5% of children require hospitalisation and <2% of those admitted need intubation and ventilatory support.
  • Rarely, secondary bacterial infection can lead to pneumonia or tracheitis. Pulmonary oedema and pneumothorax are seen extremely rarely as sequelae.
  • Mortality rates in intubated children are around 0.5%.1
  • Overall mortality is low at about 1 in 10,000.11


Document references

  1. Muñiz A et al; Croup (Paediatric perspective), eMedicine, Apr 2010
  2. Croup, Clinical Knowledge Summaries (September 2008)
  3. Laurichesse H, Dedman D, Watson JM, et al; Epidemiological features of parainfluenza virus infections: laboratory surveillance in England and Wales, 1975-1997. Eur J Epidemiol. 1999 May;15(5):475-84. [abstract]
  4. Moore M, Little P; Humidified air inhalation for treating croup. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;3:CD002870. [abstract]
  5. Denny FW, Murphy TF, Clyde WA Jr, et al; Croup: an 11-year study in a pediatric practice.; Pediatrics. 1983 Jun;71(6):871-6. [abstract]
  6. Desai A; Croup (Radiology perspective), eMedicine, Mar 2010
  7. Westley CR, Cotton EK, Brooks JG; Nebulized racemic epinephrine by IPPB for the treatment of croup: a double-blind study.; Am J Dis Child. 1978 May;132(5):484-7. [abstract]
  8. Bjornson CL, Johnson DW; Croup. Lancet. 2008 Jan 26;371(9609):329-39. [abstract]
  9. Russell K, Wiebe N, Saenz A, et al; Glucocorticoids for croup.; Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(1):CD001955. [abstract]
  10. British National Formulary; 60th Edition (September 2010) British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, London (link to current BNF)
  11. McEniery J, Gillis J, Kilham H, et al; Review of intubation in severe laryngotracheobronchitis.; Pediatrics. 1991 Jun;87(6):847-53. [abstract]

Internet and further reading

  • Parsons J; Challenges for children. Aust Fam Physician. 2008 Jun;37(6):389. [abstract]
  • Cherry JD; Clinical practice. Croup. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 24;358(4):384-91.

Acknowledgements

EMIS is grateful to Dr Colin Tidy for writing this article and to Dr Sean Kavanagh and Dr Hayley Willacy for earlier versions. The final copy has passed scrutiny by the independent Mentor GP reviewing team. ©EMIS 2011.
Document ID: 1584
Document Version: 22
Document Reference: bgp532
Last Updated: 7 Feb 2011
Provide feedback