Related to this topic: Support | Patient+ | Diagrams | UK Guidelines | Online Videos | News | Equipment | Books | Your Experience | Other resources | Glossaries
Print options: Printer friendly version of this leaflet (html)     Other options:  AddThis Social Bookmark Button (what's this?)

PatientPlus articles are written for doctors and so the language can be technical. However, some people find that they add depth to the articles found in the other sections of this website which are written for non-medical people.

Delay in Second Stage of Labour and Use of Forceps

Introduction

The rate of operative vaginal delivery has remained fairly constant at 10-15%.1
Although it is now generally well established that there are significant risks associated with rotational and mid-cavity deliveries,2 there are low morbidity rates with most operative deliveries.3
It should also be remembered that Caesarean section in the second stage of labour is not without considerable morbidity.
The operator should use their skill and judgement to determine the best choice of instrument for the situation.
The RCOG currently advises that the vacuum extractor should be the first choice.4
Although this can have a higher failure rate and increased risks of cephalhaematoma, it has been shown to be associated with less maternal trauma.5,6

Avoiding The Need for Assisted Delivery

The following factors have been shown to be favourable in avoiding assisted delivery:

  • Use of a partogram to monitor progress in labour
  • Mother labours in an upright or left lateral position6
  • Avoidance of use of epidural anaesthesia

The following factors can reduce the number of mid-cavity or rotational deliveries:

  • Using oxytocin in a nulliparous mother with an epidural
  • Delaying active pushing in a nulliparous mother7
Classification of Forceps Deliveries

Classification Definition
Outlet
  • Fetal Scalp visible with labia separated
  • Fetal skull has reached the pelvic floor
  • Saggittal suture is in AP diameter or ROA/LOA or OP position
  • Rotation required ≥ 45 degrees
  • Fetal head on perineum
Low
  • Leading point ( not caput) is at +2
  • Subdivided into;
  • Rotation ≥ 45 degrees required
  • Rotation ≤ 45 degrees required
Mid-cavity
  • Head 1/5 palpable per abdomen
  • Leading point is above +2 but not above the ischial spines
  • Subdivided into;
  • Rotation ≥ 45 degrees required
  • Rotation ≤ 45 degrees required
High Not included

Indications for Instrumental Delivery

They are used to shorten the second stage of labour.
Fetal:

  • Presumed, (or diagnosed by fetal blood sampling)compromise

Maternal:

Inadequate Progress:

  • Nulliparous women:
    • Lack of progress for 3 hours ( active and passive stage combined), with regional anaesthesia
    • Lack of progress for 2 hours if no regional anaesthesia
  • Multiparous women:
    • Lack of progress for 2 hours if regional anaesthesia in place
    • Lack of progress for 1 hour if no regional anaesthesia in place
    • Maternal fatigue/ exhaustion
Contraindications
  • Predisposition to fractures in the fetus
  • Bleeding tendency or active bleeding in fetus
  • Face presentation and vaccuum extractor
  • Gestation ≤ 34 weeks8
Requirements for instrumental delivery;

Full discussion and consent should take place with mother/parents. (Acronym=FORCEPS)

  • Cervix fully dilated [F]
  • Occipito-Anterior position, preferably. OP possible with Keiilands and Vaccuum. [O]
  • Membranes ruptured [R]
  • Cephalic presentation [C]
  • Greater diameter of baby's head has passed pelvic brim [E] engaged
  • Mother is receiving adequate pain relief: [P]
    Vacuum extraction or low forceps - minimum of perineal nerve block
    Mid forceps - epidural or pudendal nerve block or general
  • Bladder empty [S] sphincter
Higher Failure Rates

These are associated with:

  • Maternal BMI ≥ 30
  • Estimated fetal weight ≥ 4kg
  • OP position
  • Mid-cavity deliveries

These factors should prompt trial of delivery with preparations to proceed to Caesarean section immediately, if unsuccessful.
The procedure should be abandoned if no descent is seen with 3 pulls.
An incident report should be completed.
Using differing instruments sequentially is not recommended.9

Outcomes
  • Vacuum-assisted delivery has a lower rate of successful delivery but is less likely to lead to Caesarean section than the use of forceps.
  • Vacuum-assisted delivery is also associated with less use of anaesthesia and fewer severe maternal injuries.
  • However, use of forceps following failed vacuum extraction can lead to high level of damage to mother.
  • Cephalhaematomas and retinal haemorrhages are well recognised sequelae of vacuum extraction but usually have no long term adverse effects.4

Adverse symptoms such as urinary and faecal incontinence are common in mothers with both forms of assisted delivery.5,6

Audit

Suitable subjects may include:

  • Rate of use
  • Rate of failures
  • Incidence of maternal tears
  • Neonatal trauma
  • Standard of documentation

Document References
  1. RCOG.; Operative Vaginal Delivery.
  2. Chiswick ML, James D; Kielland's forceps.; Br Med J. 1979 Mar 17;1(6165):747-8.
  3. Gei AF, Belfort MA; Forceps-assisted vaginal delivery.; Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1999 Jun;26(2):345-70. [abstract]
  4. Cochrane forceps vs vaccuum; Johanson RB, Menon V. Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2004. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
  5. Johanson RB, Heycock E, Carter J, et al; Maternal and child health after assisted vaginal delivery: five-year follow up of a randomised controlled study comparing forceps and ventouse.; Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Jun;106(6):544-9. [abstract]
  6. Fitzpatrick M, Behan M, O'Connell PR, et al; Randomised clinical trial to assess anal sphincter function following forceps or vacuum assisted vaginal delivery.; BJOG. 2003 Apr;110(4):424-9. [abstract]
  7. Roberts CL, Torvaldsen S, Cameron CA, et al; Delayed versus early pushing in women with epidural analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.; BJOG. 2004 Dec;111(12):1333-40.
  8. Vacca A.The Trouble with vacuum extraction. Current Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1999;9:41-5.
  9. Towner D, Castro MA, Eby-Wilkens E, et al; Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury.; N Engl J Med. 1999 Dec 2;341(23):1709-14. [abstract]
Acknowledgements EMIS is grateful to Dr Hayley Willacy for writing this article. The final copy has passed scrutiny by the independent Mentor GP reviewing team. ©EMIS 2007.
DocID: 964
Document Version: 20
DocRef: bgp247
Last Updated: 7 Sep 2006
Review Date: 6 Sep 2008




















Disclaimer: Patient UK has no control of the content of the above links. Inclusion does not imply endorsement by Patient UK.

Advertise on this site














Disclaimer: Patient UK has no control of the content of the above links. Inclusion does not imply endorsement by Patient UK.

Advertise on this site


PS - Health and Poverty

Perhaps the biggest cause of ill health in the world is poverty. Help to Make Poverty History. For example, why not lend some of your money to disadvantaged communities to enable them to trade their way out of poverty through schemes such as Shared Interest.

See also MAKEPOVERTYHISTORY North East for details and links to campaigns against poverty.

^ Top of Page