Experience | Weblinks | News | Products | Other
This is a PatientPlus article. PatientPlus articles are written for doctors and so the language can be technical. However, some people find that they add depth to the articles found in the other sections of this website which are written for non-medical people.
Chorionic Villus Sampling
Post your experienceSynonym - CVS
Sampling a part of the developing placenta during the first trimester of pregnancy (usually between 10-13 weeks), allowing examination of the fetal karyotype and/or genotype. It can be performed by transabdominal or transcervical routes, the former being able to be performed beyond 13 weeks also.
Aim of procedure - Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal/single-gene abnormalities.
Most likely to be used in the following situations1
|
- Previous or suspected neural tube defects (as not the appropriate test)
- Active bleeding
- Infection
- Transcervical route of sampling: cervical polyps, fibroids, fundal placenta, retroverted uterus with posterior placement of placenta
- Procedure is usually performed at 10-13 weeks.2
- Written consent should be obtained.
- Sample obtained either by ultrasound-guided transabdominal needle, or transcervical cannula aspiration/biopsy forceps.
- Results are obtained within 7-14 days (direct preparation 1 week, long-term culture 2 weeks).
- Thus CVS allows earlier diagnosis than with amniocentesis (which may only be safely conducted in the second trimester) and earlier opportunity to consider termination of pregnancy in the event of a fetal abnormality.
- Use of biopsy forceps rather than cannula aspiration for transcervical route seems to make the procedure technically easier, and to be preferred by patients and operators alike.3
Diagnostic accuracy 97.5-99.6%, depending on abnormality being screened for. It's slightly less accurate than amniocentesis because of placental mosaicism (the placenta can have populations of cells with different karyotype/genotype in about 0.8-1.6% of cases). If results from direct preparation are inconclusive then amniocytes need to be cultured.
- Repeat procedures are required in 1-10% of cases due either to laboratory failure, mosaicism, ambiguous results, insufficient sample or maternal cell contamination. The latter occurs more frequently in transcervical CVS (1.9%-3.8%).
- In a low risk population, background pregnancy loss is about 2%, and second trimester amniocentesis increases this risk by a further 1%.
- Miscarriage rates following CVS is higher than after second trimester amniocentesis. However, there is some evidence to suggest this continues to improve over time probably relating to improvements in technique.4
- The increase in risk is significantly higher for transcervical CVS in terms of pregnancy loss and miscarriage.5
- Transcervical CVS is more technically demanding than transabdominal route and more likely to lead to sample failures and multiple insertions.5
- On the whole, second trimester amniocentesis is safer than transcervical sampling or early amniocentesis.5
- Where early diagnosis is needed, transabdominal CVS is preferred to early amniocentesis/transcervical CVS.5
- Where transabdominal CVS is not technically possible then transcervical CVS or second trimester amniocentesis should be used.5
- Amniotic fluid leakage 0.3-0.7%
- Vaginal bleeding 7% (higher for transcervical vs. transabdominal route)
- Sepsis (rare)
CVS at 8-9 weeks was reported to be associated with an increased incidence in limb deficiencies (oromandibular limb hypoplasia and isolated limb disruption) in the foetus and so procedure no longer performed this early. The association between limb abnormalities and early chorionic villus sampling is uncertain, but some believe CVS has distinct teratogenic effects.6 There are reports of earlier CVS being carried out in exceptional circumstances, but there was higher fetal loss and a case of limb abnormality.7
Any benefits of earlier diagnosis with CVS must be carefully balanced against the greater risk of pregnancy loss compared with second trimester amniocentesis. There appears to be no significant difference in long-term health outcomes between children who had transcervical CVS or amniocentesis for prenatal testing.8
Document References
- Stranc LC, Evans JA, Hamerton JL; Chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis. Lancet. 1997 Mar 8;349(9053):711-4.
- Amniocentesis Guideline, Royal College of Obtetricians and Gynecologists (2005)
- von Dadelszen P, Sermer M, Hillier J, et al; A randomised controlled trial of biopsy forceps and cannula aspiration for transcervical chorionic villus sampling. BJOG. 2005 May;112(5):559-66. [abstract]
- Caughey AB, Hopkins LM, Norton ME; Chorionic villus sampling compared with amniocentesis and the difference in the rate of pregnancy loss. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep;108(3 Pt 1):612-6. [abstract]
- Alfirevic Z, Sundberg K, Brigham S; Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(3):CD003252. [abstract]
- Brambati B, Tului L; Chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr;17(2):197-201. [abstract]
- Wapner RJ, Evans MI, Davis G, et al; Procedural risks versus theology: chorionic villus sampling for Orthodox Jews at less than 8 weeks' gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;186(6):1133-6. [abstract]
- Schaap AH, van der Pol HG, Boer K, et al; Long-term follow-up of infants after transcervical chorionic villus sampling and after amniocentesis to compare congenital abnormalities and health status. Prenat Diagn. 2002 Jul;22(7):598-604. [abstract]
Internet and Further Reading
- Corionic Villus Sampling; NHS Direct Health Encyclopaedia; June 2007.
DocID: 1952
Document Version: 20
DocRef: bgp223
Last Updated: 20 Aug 2007
Review Date: 19 Aug 2009
The authors and editors of this article are employed to create accurate and up to date content reflecting reliable research evidence, guidance and best clinical practice. They are free from any commercial conflicts of interest. Find out more about updating.
Patient UK Hearing Impairment Survey
Patient UK are grateful to the 550 people who took part in this survey.
To see the results click here.
If you'd like to leave your feedback, please go to our interactive forum.
Experience | Weblinks | News | Products | Other
Related pages in Patient UK
Your Experience (^ top of page)
Please add your experience about this condition / medicineLinks to other selected websites related to this topic (^ top of page)
Chorionic Villus SamplingPatient UK Newspaper (^ top of page)
Latest Health News
View current health newsRelated Products (^ top of page)
Medical equipment

Books

Other - Useful resources (^ top of page)
Pictures, diagrams, photos, images, etc.Evidence based medicine
Online textbooks and journals
UK Guidelines
Online Videos
Medline
Other good health sites
Want to search some more? Use the Google Search box below to search our site.
Disclaimer: Patient UK has no control over the content of any external links above. Inclusion does not imply endorsement by Patient UK.
Want to advertise on this site? Find out how >>
Here you can follow a link to view existing patient experiences on this subject, or to add your own
This will offer you the usual PDF options i.e. document navigation, search, zoom and formatted print
Note: this is the best way to print the document
Note: this will open in a new window
Note: this will open in a new window
Here you can follow a link to view existing patient experiences on this subject, or to add your own
This will offer you the usual PDF options i.e. document navigation, search, zoom and formatted print
Note: this is the best way to print the document
Note: this will open in a new window
Note: this will open in a new window




