Advertising Survey

We would like your input on how advertising is currently used in the site.

Please take this short survey to help us out.

Hide this message

Obstetric Ultrasound

This PatientPlus article is written for healthcare professionals so the language may be more technical than the condition leaflets. You may find the abbreviations list helpful.

Obstetric ultrasound was first introduced in the late 1950s. It is now widely used and has become a useful tool in monitoring and diagnosis.

Booking scan

The first ultrasound scan is usually performed before 15 weeks.1
The purpose is to:

  • Diagnose pregnancy
  • Accurately determine gestational age - this is essential for intervention of post-maturity, and for accurate serum screening for Down's syndrome
  • Viability - to confirm presence of heartbeat and exclude ectopic pregnancy and hydatidiform mole
  • Determine fetal number and, in multiple pregnancies, the chorionicity/amnionicity
  • Detect gross fetal abnormalities

Procedure

  • Measurement of crown rump length accurately measures gestational age if performed before 13 weeks. After 13 weeks, the fetus becomes increasingly flexed so results are inaccurate. Alternatives that can be used after this include bi-parietal diameter, and/or head circumference, or femur length.
  • Usually performed abdominally, although occasionally a vaginal scan is necessary
  • Nuchal translucency scans for risk of Down’s syndrome are best performed between 10-14 weeks

Screening for structural abnormalities - anomaly scan

This scan is offered to pregnant women ideally between 18-20 weeks' gestation.1 This scan can provide dating information and diagnosis of multiple pregnancy, in units where no booking scan is performed.
The main purpose is:

  • To reassure the mother that her baby appears to have no gross structural abnormalities.
    • 50% significant abnormalities will be detected by the 20-week screening scan.
    • To provide the parents with options, e.g. termination, preparation, appropriate care throughout rest of pregnancy and delivery.
  • To determine placental morphology and localisation.
    • Where the placenta extends across the internal cervical os, another scan at 36 weeks should be offered.
  • To confirm that fetal growth is appropriate.

Procedure

  • Assess growth by measurement methods below:
    • Bi-parietal diameter (most accurate for dating up to 20 weeks)
    • Head circumference
    • Femur length
    • Abdominal circumference
  • Look at head shape and internal structures:
    • Cavum septum pellucidum
    • Cerebellum
    • Ventricular size at atrium (<10 mm)
  • Minimum standards:
    • Spine: longitudinal and transverse
    • Abdominal shape and content at level of stomach
    • Abdominal shape and content at level of kidneys and umbilicus
    • Renal pelvis (<5 mm AP measurement)
    • Longitudinal axis – abdominal-thoracic appearance (diaphragm/bladder)
    • Thorax at level of 4-chamber cardiac view
    • Aortic arch
    • Arms – three bones and hand (not counting fingers)
    • Legs – three bones and orientation of feet (not counting toes)
  • Optimal standards:
    • Cardiac outflow tracts
    • Face, nose and lips; 15% women may have to return for further checks

Aneuploidy checks

Aneuploidy scans are not routinely performed, as many normal pregnancies may have some of these features - i.e. there is a high false-positive rate.1 Pregnancies affected by aneuploidy (abnormal chromosome number) will have sonographic markers. However, 50-80% of affected cases will already be identified by triple test, maternal age and nuchal translucency measurements.
Indications for 'marker' scan include:

Ultrasound checklist for screening for aneuploidy
Common sonographic 'markers' for aneuploidyOther risk factors
Choroid plexus cystMaternal age
Ventriculomegaly (>10 mm at the atrium)Serum screening results
Echogenic bowel (equivalent to bone density)Nuchal translucency (10- to 14-week scan)
Head shape 
Nuchal pad (>5 mm at 20 weeks) 
Cysterna magna 
Cleft lip 
Echogenic foci in heart 
Dilated renal pelvis (>5 mm AP) 
Short femur/humerus 
Talipes 
Sandal gap 
Clinodactyly 
Clenched hand 
Two-vessel cord 

General standards

These are set by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists to assure the quality of service provision. They include providing clear, written advice that includes detection rates for defined, common conditions. A trained counsellor in the area of diagnosis and screening should be available, as should a quiet room for breaking bad news about the baby. It should be possible to discuss the findings with an obstetrician within 24 hours or soon after detection of the anomaly.

Potential detection rates based on Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology screening strategy

Using standard 20-week scan checklist:

Fetal presentation and cervical length

  • Suspected fetal malpresentation, e.g. breech, should be confirmed by an ultrasound examination after 36 weeks.2
  • A short cervix diagnosed by vaginal ultrasound has a good predictive value for preterm delivery, even in a low-risk population. Research has shown a relative risk of preterm delivery ( prior to 35 weeks) of 6.19 for lengths measured at 28 weeks which are at or below the 10th percentile of normal cervical lengths for that gestation (26 mm), or 9.49 for lengths at or below the 5th percentile (22 mm).3

Biophysical profile screening

This is a type of fetal assessment using specific criteria to reach a well-being score for high-risk pregnancies. It is based on the Apgar scoring system used to assess the condition of the newborn.
It was introduced in the 1980s and, despite minor refinements of the original test, the assessments still include five main features:

  • Monitoring of fetal movements
  • Fetal tone
  • Fetal breathing
  • Assessment of amniotic fluid volume
  • Assessment of fetal heart rate by electronic monitoring

Biophysical profile fetal assessment is based on the association between low biophysical scores and poor pregnancy outcome.4 Hence the procedure aims to detect acute and chronic fetal compromise with changes in fetal heart patterns, decreased body and breathing movements, reduced amniotic fluid, oliguria, and redistribution of regional blood flow leading to a reduction in fetal renal blood flow.

Doppler ultrasound

Doppler ultrasound uses high-intensity sound waves to detect the blood circulation in the baby, uterus and placenta.

  • The application has extended from the umbilical cord to fetal vessels (aorta, cerebral and renal arteries) as well as maternal vessels supplying the placental intervillous space.
  • It is used for high-risk pregnancies where there is concern about baby's well-being, e.g. intrauterine growth retardation, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and to distinguish between the normal small fetus and the 'sick' small fetus.
  • Despite its advances, it is not of use in routine antenatal screening because several studies have shown it is an unnecessary intervention and may cause possible adverse effects.5 Its current role in optimising management, particularly timing of delivery, remains unclear.


Document references

  1. RCOG. Ultrasound screening. Clinical guidance. 2008.
  2. Antenatal care: routine care for the healthy pregnant woman, NICE Clinical Guideline (March 2008)
  3. Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, et al; The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med. 1996 Feb 29;334(9):567-72. [abstract]
  4. Alfirevic Z, Neilson JP; Biophysical profile for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000038. [abstract]
  5. Westergaard HB, Langhoff-Roos J, Lingman G, et al; A critical appraisal of the use of umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies: use of meta-analyses in evidence-based obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jun;17(6):466-76. [abstract]

Internet and further reading

  • Woo JSK. Obstetric ultarsound; a comprehensive guide. Useful website with extensive scan pictures shown.

Acknowledgements

EMIS is grateful to Dr Hayley Willacy for writing this article. The final copy has passed scrutiny by the independent Mentor GP reviewing team. ©EMIS 2011.
Document ID: 2532
Document Version: 22
Document Reference: bgp222
Last Updated: 5 Oct 2009
Provide feedback