Faecal Incontinence

Prevalence

Approximately 2% of the adult population get daily or weekly episodes. Studies of healthy independent adults over 65 years have detected a prevalence of 7%, and one third of elderly in retirement homes or hospital have been found to be suffering from faecal incontinence.¹

By virtue of the nature of the condition, faecal incontinence remains largely a hidden problem. Recent NICE guidance² recommends that active but sensitive case finding may be required, particularly in high-risk groups:

Be aware that faecal incontinence is a symptom or sign rather than a disease, and that there are often multiple contributory factors.²Professionals should not concentrate on one specific diagnosis to the total exclusion of all other factors.

A baseline assessment should include relevant medical history, a general examination, an anorectal examination, and an assessment of cognitive function if appropriate.

Because NICE guidance encourages clinicians to consider faecal incontinence as a multifactorial condition, it moves away from a list of specific causes. However, such a list may still be helpful in certain circumstances. Recognised associations with faecal incontinence include:

Childbirth

Incontinence is common after the use of forceps, a large baby, occipitoposterior position and a long second stage of labour.¹ 13% of women develop incontinence after their first vaginal delivery, and 30% have structural damage as evidenced by anal endosonography.³ Of 0.5 to 1% of women with a recognised third degree tear, 85% have residual structural sphincter damage, and over half of this group have symptoms despite primary repair at the time of delivery.⁴

Surgery

This is the commonest cause after obstetric trauma.¹ Incontinence may be inevitable after complex anal fistula surgery, or may occur as an unexpected complication after haemorrhoidectomy or surgery for chronic anal fissure.⁵ The incidence is reducing with advances in surgical techniques.⁶

Degeneration of the internal anal sphincter

After structural damage, this is the commonest cause of sphincter dysfunction.⁷ Most cases are due to primary isolated degeneration of the smooth muscle of the internal anal sphincter is seen. The condition is commonest in middle age and affects both men and women. Endosonography often shows that the anal sphincter is fibrotic and thin, and resting anal pressure is low. Degeneration is occasionally seen secondary to progressive systemic sclerosis, radiotherapy for cervical or other pelvic neoplasms, or chronic idiopathic intestinal pseudo-obstruction.^1,7

Neurological disease

Faecal incontinence is a feature of many neurological diseases, and may be aggravated by non-neurological factors such as the side effects of drugs or childbirth. One study reported that 50% of multiple sclerosis patients had faecal incontinence, with a weekly occurrence in 25%. ⁸ It can also be a feature of diabetic autonomic neuropathy.⁹

Congenital disorders

90% of spina bifida patients report faecal incontinence, with 50% soiling regularly.¹⁰ It can also occur as a consequence of surgery for congenital disorders. 50-80% of patients treated for anal atresia reported some incontinence, and one study of 60 Hirschprung patients identified that 53% subsequently had severe soiling.^11,12

Miscellaneous

Children with a normal sphincter can pass stools inappropriately as part of a behavioural disorder (encopresis), or can suffer from faecal impaction with overflow.^13,14 In some children the condition is due to a poorly defined neuromuscular disorder of the distal gut which can persist into adulthood.¹ Other conditions that can be associated with faecal incontinence include rectal prolapse, inflammatory bowel disease, and unwanted anal penetration.^1,15,16

Person-centred care

Management should be tailored to the needs of the individual. Information should be provided in a format which they can understand, so that they can participate in decisions about their care. Family and carers should be involved in this process, unless the individual deems this inappropriate.

Condition-specific interventions

The following potentially reversible conditions should be excluded, and if present treated with condition-specific interventions before other initial management is instituted:

• Faecal loading
• Potentially treatable causes of diarrhoea (for example infective, inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome)
• Warning signs for lower gastrointestinal cancer¹⁷
• Rectal prolapse or third-degree haemorrhoids
• Acute anal sphincter injury including obstetric and other trauma
• Acute disc prolapse/cauda equina syndrome

Basic initial interventions

Interventions should promote ideal stool consistency and predictable bowel emptying.

• Diet
  • Existing therapeutic diets should be taken into account.
  • Overall nutrient intake should be balanced.
  • A food and fluid diary might be helpful.
  • Advise patients to modify one food at a time.
  • Patients with hard stools and/or dehydration should be encouraged to aim for at least 1.5 litres' intake of fluid per day (unless contraindicated).
  • Consider screening for malnutrition, or risk of malnutrition.
• Bowel and toileting Habits
  • Bowel emptying should be encouraged after a meal.
  • Toilet facilities should be private, comfortable and used safely with sufficient time allowed.
  • The patient should adopt a sitting or squatting position to avoid straining.
  • Locations of toilets should be made clear and any equipment or help needed to access the toilet provided.
  • Advice should be offered on easily removable clothing.
  • Refer for home and mobility assessment if appropriate.
• Medication
  • Consider alternatives to drugs contributing to faecal incontinence.
  • Anti-diarrhoeal drugs should be prescribed in accordance with the summary of product characteristics, for people with loose stools and associated incontinence once other causes have been excluded.
  • Loperamide hydrochloride should be first drug of choice. Consider loperamide hydrochloride syrup for doses less than 2 mg.
  • Codeine phosphate or co-phenotrope may be tried for those unable to tolerate loperamide hydrochloride.
  • Loperamide hydrochloride should not be offered to people with hard or infrequent stools, acute diarrhoea without a diagnosed cause, or an acute flare-up of ulcerative colitis.
  • Loperamide hydrochloride should be introduced at a very low dose and increased as tolerated until desired stool consistency is reached. Subsequent doses can be adjusted accordingly to stool consistency and lifestyle.
• Coping strategies People with faecal incontinence should be offered advice on:
  • Continence products
  • Emotional and psychological support
  • Talking to friends and family
  • Planning travel and carrying a toilet access card or RADAR key
  • Disposable body-worn pads and disposable bed pads
  • Anal plugs
  • Skin-care, odour control and laundry advice
  • Disposable gloves
  • Reusable absorbent products are not generally recommended

Specific groups

• People with faecal loading
  • Offer a rectally administered treatment to satisfactorily clear the bowel, or a potent oral laxative if this is not appropriate. Often treatment will need to be repeated daily for a few days.
  • Recommend a combination of initial management options to reduce recurrence (see below).
  • Consider the use of orally administered laxatives if rectal treatments fail.
• People with limited mobility
  • Consider a combination of oral or rectal laxatives and/or constipating agents.
  • Review toilet access,
  • Advise concerning appropriate disposable products (see Coping strategies above).
  • Advise re timing of toileting - i.e. stool needs to be in the rectum at the time of the planned bowel action.
• People using enteral tube feeding and reporting faecal incontinence
  • Modify the type and timing of feed on an individual basis to establish the most effective way to manage faecal incontinence.
• People with severe cognitive impairment
  • Refer for a behavioural and functional analysis to determine if there is any behavioural reason for faecal incontinence.
  • If behavioural aspects are identified that contribute to faecal incontinence, offer cause-specific interventions founded on structured goal planning that aim to resolve them.
  • In cases of severe cognitive impairment, further specialist management of faecal incontinence may be inappropriate.
• People with neurological or spinal disease/injury
  • Offer, until satisfactory bowel habit is established, a bowel management programme which:
    • Ascertains the person's preferences and premorbid bowel habit.
    • Maximises the person's understanding of normal bowel function and how it has been altered.
    • Modifies diet and/or administers rectal evacuants and/or oral laxatives, adjusted to individual response, to establish a predictable pattern of bowel evacuation.
    • Considers digital anorectal stimulation for people with spinal cord injuries or other neurogenic bowel disorders.
    • Considers manual/digital removal of faeces, particularly for people with a lower spinal injury.
  • For those unable to achieve reliable bowel continence after a neurological bowel management programme offer:
    • Coping and long-term management strategies (see 'Coping strategies' above and 'Long-term strategies' below)
    • Rectal irrigation
    • Other surgical options (including stoma) if faecal incontinence or the time taken for bowel emptying imposes major limits on their lifestyle
• People with learning disabilities
  • It is essential that these people follow the same initial care pathway as other people with faecal incontinence, regardless of when their faecal incontinence started.
• Severely or terminally ill people
  • Consider a faecal collection device

Specialist management

This should be considered for people who continue to have episodes of faecal incontinence despite initial management. Such management may include:

• Pelvic floor muscle training
• Bowel retraining
• Specialist dietary assessment and management
• Biofeedback
• Electrical stimulation
• Rectal irrigation
• Surgery - the benefits and limitations should be discussed, as follows:
  • Sphincter repair should be considered for people with a full-length external anal sphincter defect that is 90° or greater and faecal incontinence that restricts quality of life. The effectiveness of procedure decreased in people with internal sphincter defects, pudendal nerve neuropathy, multiple defects, external sphincter atrophy, loose stools or irritable bowel syndrome.
• People undergoing anal sphincter repair should not:
  • Routinely receive a temporary defunctioning stoma.
  • Receive constipating agents in the postoperative period.
• Consider a trial of temporary sacral nerve stimulation if sphincter surgery is inappropriate, and proceed to implantation if successful.
• Consider a neosphincter (stimulated graciloplasty or an artificial anal sphincter) if a trial of sacral nerve stimulation is unsuccessful.^18,19,20 Advise patients that they may experience evacuatory disorders and/or serious infection, which may necessitate removal of the device.
• Antegrade irrigation via appendicostomy, neo-appendicostomy or continent colonic conduit should be offered to selected people with constipation and colonic motility disorders associated with faecal incontinence.
• A stoma for people with faecal incontinence that severely restricts lifestyle should only be considered once all appropriate non-surgical and surgical options, including those at specialist centres, have been considered. Refer to a stoma care service.

Long-term strategies

Symptomatic people who do not want to persevere with active treatment or who have intractable faecal incontinence should be offered:

• Advice on preservation of dignity and, where possible, independence.
• At least 6-monthly review of symptoms.
• Discussion of other management options (including specialist referral).
• Contact details for relevant support groups.
• Advice on coping strategies and skin care.