Related to this topic: Support | Patient+ | Equipment | Books | Your Experience | Other resources | Glossaries
Print options: Printer friendly version of this leaflet (html)     Other options:  AddThis Social Bookmark Button (what's this?)

PatientPlus articles are written for doctors and so the language can be technical. However, some people find that they add depth to the articles found in the other sections of this website which are written for non-medical people.

Femoral Hernias

Description

Hernia in the groin may be either inguinal or, less commonly, femoral in origin. The anatomy of the femoral canal is that the anterior border is the inguinal ligament, the posterior border is the pectineal ligament, the medial border is the lacunar ligament and the lateral border is the femoral vein.

Epidemiology

In the financial year 1995/96 there were 5,146 femoral hernia repairs in NHS hospitals in England. Of these, 4,951 (96.2%) were primary repairs and 195 (3.8%) recurrent repairs. This compares with respective figures of 81,323 (93.8) and 6328 (7.2%) for inguinal hernia.1 Femoral herniae account for only around 7% of all herniae in the groin.2

  • Inguinal hernia is more common in men than in women
  • Femoral hernia is about 4 times as common in women than in men
  • In women, inguinal hernia is more common than femoral hernia
  • The incidence is highest in middle-aged and elderly women, especially if parous
  • They are rare in children and account for about 1% of groin hernias. Sex incidence is equal. Diagnosis is often difficult.3
  • In elderly women the incidence of femoral hernia approaches that of inguinal hernia
Presentation
  • Presentation is as a lump in the groin lateral and inferior to the pubic tubercle but a large hernia may bulge over the inguinal ligament and make differential diagnosis difficult.
  • The hernia often appears or swells on coughing or straining and reduces in size or disappears when relaxed or supine.
  • There may be a cough impulse.
  • It may be possible to reduce the hernia.
  • According to findings, the hernia may be classified as reducible, irreducible, obstructed or strangulated.
Investigation
  • Diagnosis is largely clinical or even on exploration at operation.
  • Herniography may help in the investigation of pain in the groin.
  • Imaging techniques are of dubious value.4
Differential Diagnosis

The differentiation between inguinal and femoral hernia is not easy and doctors often get it wrong. Surgeons, including those in training, tend to be better than GPs but they too are far from perfect and so alternative criteria have been suggested.5

  • Traditionally it is taught that an inguinal hernia will lie above and medial to the pubic tubercle whereas a femoral hernia lies lateral and below.
  • This is not strictly true as the internal ring is always lateral to the femoral canal and a small indirect inguinal hernia will therefore be lateral to the pubic tubercle.
  • Also, a direct hernia will be lateral to or above the pubic tubercle.
  • A better test might be to place the finger over the femoral canal for reducible hernias and then ask the patient to cough. This landmark is easily felt either by following the adductor longus tendon to below the inguinal ligament and then placing ones fingers anterior and lateral to the tendon or alternatively palpating the femoral artery and placing ones hand approximately a finger breath medial to it.
  • When the patient coughs a femoral hernia should remain reduced while an inguinal hernia will re-appear as an obvious swelling.5

Other causes of lumps in the groin include:

Complications

The main concern with a hernia is strangulation.

  • The risk of strangulation in a femoral hernia is 2% at 3 months and 45% at 21 months.6 This is very much greater than for an inguinal hernia.
  • Only 50% of patients are aware of the hernia before strangulation.
  • Around 60% present in the emergency situation.5

If strangulation occurs, the lump will become red and tender as well as tense and irreducible. Other features include colicky abdominal pain, distension and vomiting to indicate a surgical emergency. Fluid and electrolyte imbalance must be corrected followed swiftly by repair of the hernia.

Failure to make a correct diagnosis is common. It is associated with a greater risk of needing bowel resection and a higher mortality.7

Management

In view of the high risk of strangulation, all femoral herniae should be repaired as an elective procedure, but as soon as possible. There is no place for a truss for a femoral hernia.

There are 3 surgical approaches, each named eponymously. There is a low approach called Lockwood, a transinguinal called Lotheissen and a high called McEvedy. Each technique has the principle of dissection of the sac with reduction of its contents, followed by ligation of the sac and closure between the inguinal and pectineal ligaments. A laparoscopic technique that uses mesh and keeps outside the peritoneum seems promising.8 However, with 10 male and 5 female in the series and a mean age of 55 they seem unusually male dominated and unusually young. Laparoscopic hernia repair has advantages but it should be in the province of the specialist.9 A Cochrane review found that open mesh repair was associated with a reduced risk of recurrence.10

In those who are unfit for general anaesthesia, local anaesthetic may be used.11

Prognosis

The mortality for elective hernia repair, both inguinal and femoral, is 0.1% below the age of 60, 0.2% between 60 and 69, 1.6% between 70 and 79 and 3.3% over the age of 80.

The risk for emergency repair of a strangulated hernia is 10 times higher and many patients are 80 years or over. The overall operative mortality for strangulated hernia is 10%. High age and the need to resect necrotic bowel increase the risk. The death rate from surgery for strangulated herniae has changed little over the past 50 years. Hence femoral hernia must be repaired if at all possible, even in the elderly.

After hernia repair there is always a risk of recurrence but a mesh plug technique can reduce this.12 A survey from Sweden13 examined the incidence of postoperative intestinal obstruction and found it low at 1.02 per 1,000. The risk was higher with a transabdominal laparoscopic approach than a totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty but other factors such as previous abdominal surgery were more important.


Document References
  1. Phillips W, Goldman M; Groin Hernia.; Healthcare needs assessment
  2. Surgical Tutor; Groin Hernias
  3. Radcliffe G, Stringer MD; Reappraisal of femoral hernia in children. Br J Surg. 1997 Jan;84(1):58-60. [abstract]
  4. Toms AP, Dixon AK, Murphy JM, et al; Illustrated review of new imaging techniques in the diagnosis of abdominal wall hernias. Br J Surg. 1999 Oct;86(10):1243-9. [abstract]
  5. Hair A, Patterson C, O'Dwyer PJ; Diagnosis of a femoral hernia in the elective setting; J.R.Coll.Surg.Edinb., 46, February 2001, 117-18
  6. Gallegos NC, Dawson J, Jarvis M, et al; Risk of strangulation in groin hernias. Br J Surg. 1991 Oct;78(10):1171-3. [abstract]
  7. Corder AP; The diagnosis of femoral hernia. Postgrad Med J. 1992 Jan;68(795):26-8. [abstract]
  8. Yalamarthi S, Kumar S, Stapleton E, et al; Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal mesh repair for femoral hernia. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2004 Dec;14(6):358-61. [abstract]
  9. No authors listed; Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia: a randomised comparison. The MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group. Lancet. 1999 Jul 17;354(9174):185-90. [abstract]
  10. Scott NW, McCormack K, Graham P, et al; Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(4):CD002197. [abstract]
  11. Dunn J, Day CJR; Local Anaesthesia for Inguinal and Femoral Hernia Repair; Practical procedures. Issue 4 (1994) Article 6
  12. Hachisuka T; Femoral hernia repair. Surg Clin North Am. 2003 Oct;83(5):1189-205. [abstract]
  13. Bringman S, Blomqvist P; Intestinal obstruction after inguinal and femoral hernia repair: a study of 33,275 operations during 1992-2000 in Sweden. Hernia. 2005 May;9(2):178-83. Epub 2004 Nov 26. [abstract]

Internet and Further Reading Acknowledgements EMIS is grateful to the Mentor authoring team for writing this article. The final copy has passed scrutiny by the independent Mentor GP reviewing team. ©EMIS 2007.
DocID: 2144
Document Version: 20
DocRef: bgp2779
Last Updated: 26 Mar 2007
Review Date: 25 Mar 2009














Disclaimer: Patient UK has no control of the content of the above links. Inclusion does not imply endorsement by Patient UK.

Advertise on this site






Disclaimer: Patient UK has no control of the content of the above links. Inclusion does not imply endorsement by Patient UK.

Advertise on this site


PS - Health and Poverty

Perhaps the biggest cause of ill health in the world is poverty. Help to Make Poverty History. For example, why not lend some of your money to disadvantaged communities to enable them to trade their way out of poverty through schemes such as Shared Interest.

See also MAKEPOVERTYHISTORY North East for details and links to campaigns against poverty.

^ Top of Page