Related to this topic: Leaflets | Support | Patient+ | Diagrams | UK Guidelines | Online Videos | News | Weblinks | Equipment | Books | Your Experience | Other resources | Glossaries
Print options: Printer friendly version of this leaflet (html)     Other options:  AddThis Social Bookmark Button (what's this?)

PatientPlus articles are written for doctors and so the language can be technical. However, some people find that they add depth to the articles found in the other sections of this website which are written for non-medical people.

Familial Breast Cancer

Local protocols should exist, or be developed for the care of women at risk of familial breast cancer. There should be clear referral mechanisms between primary, secondary and tertiary care.
The National Screening Committee doesn't currently recommend screening women for family history, however where a family history of breast cancer is identified during a routine consultation, a careful family tree of affected individuals should be constructed, and patients reassured or referred appriopriately.

NICE Guidance1

The advice from the guidance is as follows:

  • Women at, or near population risk of developing breast cancer (a 10-year risk of < 3% for women aged 40-49 years, and a lifetime risk of < 17%) are cared for in primary care.
  • Women at raised risk of developing breast cancer (a 10-year risk of 3-8% for women aged 40-49 years or a lifetime risk of between 17% and 30%) are generally cared for in secondary care.
  • Women at high risk of developing breast cancer (a 10-year risk of greater than 8% for women aged 40-49 years or a lifetime risk of > 30% ) are cared for in tertiary care. High risk also includes a >20% chance of a faulty BRCA1, BRCA2 or TP53 gene in the family.
Clinical Scenarios

The quick reference guide contains comprehensive algorithms for management of various scenarios of family history.2Within primary care the most frequent query will arise from a woman with a relative who has recently been diagnosed. In this situation the GP should consider:

  • Has 'faulty gene' been identified within the family; if this is the case a direct referral to tertiary care should be offered.
  • Is there history of breast cancer within first or second degree relatives (grandparent or grandchild, aunt/uncle, niece/nephew, half-sister/brother) on maternal or paternal sides of the family; if there is only one member of the family affected, and there are no unusual cancers within the family (or father with breast cancer) and no Jewish background, they may be managed in primary care. Unusual cancers include ovarian cancer, glioma, sarcoma, male breast cancer or bilateral breast cancer. A positive answer to the above should prompt advice from secondary care.

Referral to secondary care should also be offered if:

  • The woman has 1 first degree and 1 second degree relative diagnosed before the age of 50 years.
  • If there are 2 first degree relatives diagnosed before 50 years of age.
  • 3 or more first or second degree relatives diagnosed at any age.
  • 1 first degree male relative ( father, son or brother) diagnosed at any age.
  • 1 first degree relative with bilateral breast cancer; the first tumour diagnosed before 50 years.
  • 1 first or second degree relative with ovarian cancer at any age, and also one first or second degree raltive with breast cancer at any age.

All women aged 40-49 years satisfying referral criteria to secondary or specialist care should be offered annual mammographic surveillance.
Information about the potential advantages and disadvantages of surveillance for the early detection of breast cancer should be given. This should be of high quality and audited.

Management in Primary Care
  • A first- and second-degree family history should be taken in primary care when a woman presents with breast symptoms, or has concerns about relatives with breast cancer. This will assess risk and allow proper classification and care, as above.
  • The woman should be given information concerning breast awareness and self-examination.
  • The woman should be advised to return if her family history changes, or breast symptoms develop.
  • Women should have access to psychological support and assessment where necessary. Information on local or national support groups should be available.
  • Appropriate lifestyle advice should be offered regarding risk factors e.g. contraception, smoking and alcohol.
Risk factors

Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT)

  • Women with a family history of breast cancer should be advised of the increased risk of breast cancer with type and duration of treatment.3
  • Advice should be tailored for the individual's history e.g. age, severity of symptoms and osteoporosis risk.
  • HRT use where there is a family history should be with as low a dose, for as short a period of time as possible. If possible, oestrogen only HRT should be given. Use should be confined to women 50 years or younger.
  • Alternatives for symptom control should be considered where available.

Hormonal Contraception

  • There is an increased risk for women over 35 years of age with a family history of breast cancer.
  • Women who have the BRCA 1 mutation should be informed of the conflict between the potential increased risk of breast cancer under the age of 40 years, versus the potential lifetime protection against ovarian cancer.

Breastfeeding

  • This reduces risk of breast cancer and should be advocated where possible.

Alcohol

  • Alcohol consumption where there is a family history of breast cancer increases risk slightly.4 This should be balanced against any positive benefits that may be seen with moderate intake, for heart disease.

Weight and Exercise

  • There is an increased risk for the post-menopausal woman if she is overweight.
  • There are potential benefits in risk reduction with physical exercise.

Menstrual or Reproductive Problems

  • Advice should be available about the effect of various disorders on the risk of breast cancer developing.

Screening
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) screening offers increased sensitivity compared to mammography alone.5 Women who have recently presented for care, who are known to have a genetic mutation should be offered annual MRI surveillance if they are:
    • BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers aged 30-49 years
    • TP53 mutation carriers aged 20 years or older
  • New MRI surveillance should be offered annually when indicated:
    • From 30-39 years; to women at a 10-year risk of > 8%
    • From 40-49 years; to women at a 10-year risk of > 20%
    • To women at a 10-year risk of > 12%, where mammography has shown a dense breast pattern
  • Only a small proportion of women who are from high-risk families require genetic testing.
  • Risk-reducing surgery (mastectomy ± oophorectomy) is appropriate only for a small proportion of women who are from high-risk families and should be managed by a multidisciplinary team.


Document References
  1. NICE. Familial Breast Cancer - full guidance.; October 2006
  2. NICE. Familial breast cancer - quick reference guide; October 2006
  3. Farquhar CM, Marjoribanks J, Lethaby A, et al; Long term hormone therapy for perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.; Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;(3):CD004143. [abstract]
  4. Dumitrescu RG, Shields PG; The etiology of alcohol-induced breast cancer.; Alcohol. 2005 Apr;35(3):213-25. [abstract]
  5. Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK, et al; Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet. 2005 May 21-27;365(9473):1769-78. [abstract]

Internet and Further Reading
  • NICE Breast Cancer Service Guidance: Improving outcomes in breast cancer
  • No authors listed; Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58,209 women with breast cancer and 101,986 women without the disease.; Lancet. 2001 Oct 27;358(9291):1389-99. [abstract]
Acknowledgements EMIS is grateful to Dr Hayley Willacy for writing this article. The final copy has passed scrutiny by the independent Mentor GP reviewing team. ©EMIS 2007.
DocID: 4074
Document Version: 20
DocRef: bgp26006
Last Updated: 30 Apr 2007
Review Date: 29 Apr 2009














Disclaimer: Patient UK has no control of the content of the above links. Inclusion does not imply endorsement by Patient UK.

Advertise on this site








Disclaimer: Patient UK has no control of the content of the above links. Inclusion does not imply endorsement by Patient UK.

Advertise on this site


PS - Health and Poverty

Perhaps the biggest cause of ill health in the world is poverty. Help to Make Poverty History. For example, why not lend some of your money to disadvantaged communities to enable them to trade their way out of poverty through schemes such as Shared Interest.

See also MAKEPOVERTYHISTORY North East for details and links to campaigns against poverty.

^ Top of Page