Related to this topic: Leaflets | Support | Patient+ | UK Guidelines | Online Videos | News | Weblinks | Poem/Story | Equipment | Books | Your Experience | Other resources | Glossaries
Print options: Printer friendly version of this leaflet (html)     Other options:  AddThis Social Bookmark Button (what's this?)

PatientPlus articles are written for doctors and so the language can be technical. However, some people find that they add depth to the articles found in the other sections of this website which are written for non-medical people.

ECG A Methodical Approach

Nowadays almost every practice has its own ECG machine. Most modern machines have a computerised system for interpretation but the clinician (doctor or nurse) should have at least a basic understanding of interpretation as machines are not infallible. The best results are obtained when machine interpretation is used to enhance the physician's diagnosis, even for cardiologists.1

Most texts to aid interpretation of ECGs go back to basics in that they deal with the effects of depolarisation in various directions and the sum of vectors. Many non-specialists find this daunting and confusing. This is a simple, methodical, dogmatic and pragmatic approach to interpreting an ECG. A systematic approach, looking for certain features in a certain order, should substantially reduce the risk of major abnormality being overlooked. Minor abnormalities of the ECG are very common and become exponentially more common with advancing years.2 Even young, highly trained athletes may have some minor changes.3 An ECG alone as a screening test for CHD in the asymptomatic population is not a valid means of assessment.4

Interpretation requires some clinical details. How old is the patient? Is there a history of chest pain or previous myocardial infarction? Is the complaint palpitations? Is the patient tall and thin or short and wide? Is there COPD or hypertension?

Identification

The tracing should include the name of the patient, date and possibly the time of recording.

Quality and calibration
  • There must be a full 12 leads recorded and labelled plus a rhythm strip, usually from lead II.
  • The baseline must be stable and not wandering. Leads must be well attached, even if this means shaving a hairy chest.
  • There should be little interference from skeletal muscle. The patient must be relaxed and comfortable. Sometimes dyspnoea makes this difficult.
  • There should be a square wave calibration to show that 1mV is equivalent to 1cm in height.
  • Speed should be 25mm/sec. Hence 1 large square is 200msec and 1 small square is 40msec.
Rhythm and rate

Start with the rhythm strip. This is a more prolonged recording of lead II.

  • Are there P waves?
  • Are they regular?
  • Does every one precede a QRS?
  • Is the PR interval constant?
  • What is the PR interval?

The PR interval should be between 120 and 240 msec (3 to 6 small squares)

What is the ventricular rate?

Count the number of R waves over 15 large squares (3 seconds) and multiply by 20. To be slightly more accurate count the number of R waves over 30 large squares (6 seconds) and multiply by 10. The latter is preferable if the rate is slow or irregular.

QRS complex

Turn next to the precordial leads.

  • In V1, R should be much smaller than S
  • In V6, Q should be much smaller than R
  • R and S should be of approximately equal size around V3 or V4.
  • How long is the QRS complex?

It should be between 80 and 120 msec or 2 to 3 small squares.

  • Look at the V leads and measure the height of the tallest R and the deepest S. The sum should not exceed 40mm (some say 35mm). If the sum of the deflections exceeds 40mm there is electrical left ventricular hypertrophy. Assessment of left ventricular mass by ECG criteria is unreliable5 but electrical LVH carries a poor prognosis.6
  • Where there are Q waves, the depth should be no more than the height of the R in that lead.
  • The ST segments should not be more than 1mm above or below the base line. A little more deviation may be allowed in V1 and V2.
  • In V1, T may be upright, inverted biphasic or flat.
  • In V3 to V6, the T wave must be upright.

Now turn to the limb leads:

  • If there is a Q wave in I, II, aVL or aVF it should not be more than a quarter of the size of the R wave.
  • Larger Q waves may be found in III and aVR.
  • Abnormal Q waves suggest myocardial infarction, old or recent.

The ST segments should not be more than 1mm above or below the baseline.

aVR often has inverted P and T waves and a predominantly negative QRS complex. It should be thought of as an upside down lead.

Electrical axis

A tall, thin person will have a fairly vertical heart showing a right axis shift.

A short, broad person will have a fairly horizontal heart showing a left axis shift.

Electrical axis can be made unnecessarily complex but the following is a very simple guide:

  • Look at lead I. Measure the height of the positive deflection and subtract from it the depth of the negative deflection.
  • Look at aVF and do the same.
  • If the mean vector in both I and aVF are both positive the axis is between 0 and 90° and this is normal.
  • If I is positive and aVF is negative this is left axis deviation.
  • If I is negative and aVF is positive this is right axis deviation.
  • If both I and aVF are negative this is extreme axis deviation, sometimes called "north-west territory".
  • Left axis deviation up to -30° can be normal. If there is left axis deviation look at lead aVL. If aVL is predominantly negative the axis is <30° and normal. If it is predominantly positive the axis is >30° and there is significant left axis deviation.
Common abnormalities

The following are just a few of the commonest abnormalities to be encountered. The list is far from exhaustive.

Atrial flutter

P waves are well demonstrated in II, III and aVF but are best examined in V1.

Atrial flutter shows clear P waves like the teeth of a saw. There is usually a rapid ventricular rate and a 2:1 A-V block. The atrial rate is usually around 300 a minute with a ventricular rate around 150.

Atrial fibrillation

In atrial fibrillation the pattern is far less obvious. There may be rapid, small undulations, no apparent pattern or a pattern like a worn out saw, compared to the new saw pattern of flutter. This means that the amplitude is much lower than in flutter.

Abnormal PR interval

  • The PR interval is short in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. It is also short in the Lown-Ganong-Levine syndrome that is also a pre-excitation syndrome. It is less common, more controversial and is also described in its own article. There is a small deflection of the upstroke of the R wave in WPW. This is called a delta wave and is due to conduction through the aberrant Bundle of Kent. It is absent in LGL syndrome.
  • In 1st degree heart block there is a prolonged but constant PR interval. It is over 200 msec and all P waves are followed by a QRS.
  • 2nd degree heart block is called Mobitz I or Mobitz II, the latter also known as Wenckebach phenomenon.
  • In Mobitz I the PR interval is prolonged but, at regular intervals such as every 3rd or 4th P wave, there is not a QRS to follow.
  • In Mobitz II or Wenckebach the PR interval becomes progressively longer after each beat until a QRS is dropped and the pattern starts again.
  • 3rd degree heart block is complete A-V dissociation and there is no relationship between the P waves and the QRS complexes. They are fired from different pacemakers. Bradycardia is usual.

WOLFF-PARKINSON-WHITE SYNDROME (OM553a.jpg)

Ventricular tachycardias

In supraventricular tachycardia the rate is very fast, without a preceding P wave. There may be retrograde conduction to excite the atria in reverse order. SVT may look rather similar to a fast AF but the rhythm is likely to be more regular. With a fast rate there may be little time between QRS complexes so that atrial forms are difficult to find. The shape of the QRS complex is basically normal as the pacemaker is at or near the A-V node and conduction spreads down the Purkinje fibres in the usual way.

In ventricular tachycardia the rate is also very fast but the complex is abnormal as the pacemaker is not high up in the conducting system. A broader complex and inverted T waves are usual.

TORSADE DE POINTES VF (OM558c.jpg)

Myocardial infarction

The picture with myocardial infarction will vary according to the site of the infarction and whether it is partial or full thickness. Leads I and aVR are anterior leads. II, III, and aVF are inferior leads. The V leads will show if it is anterior-septal with early V leads affected or anterior-lateral with late V leads involved.

  • In the acute phase (within minutes) there is ST elevation over the affected area.
  • With a full thickness infarct there may be ST depression over the reciprocal leads (inferior leads in an anterior infarct and anterior leads in an inferior infarct).
  • T waves are higher and wider. This is called hyperacute T wave changes.
  • Pathological Q waves are defined as duration beyond 40 msec or > of R-wave amplitude
  • Over the next few hours the ST segments return to normal and shortly after, the T waves become inverted but Q waves remain.
  • If occlusion of the coronary artery is incomplete, infarction can occur without Q waves.
  • If there is ST depression in V1 and 2 but no other signs add V7,8,9 as it could be a true posterior infarct. True posterior myocardial infarction is discussed in its own article.

V7 is along the same line as V5 and V6 but in the posterior axillary line and V8 and V9 are the same distance along again.

The use of ECGs to diagnose myocardial infarction and to start thrombolysis is validated.7 The diagnostic ECG criteria for thrombolysis have varied slightly over the last few years but for both anterior and inferior infarction the criteria are:

  • 1mm of ST change in at least 2 contiguous limb leads (II, III, AVF, I,AVL).
  • 2mm of ST change in at least 2 contiguous chest leads (V1-V6).
  • New left bundle branch block.

Diagnosis of an acute MI can be very difficult in the presence of an old MI or LBBB.

The diagnostic criteria for a true posterior infarct are not so well agreed, as discussed in the article, and this makes the early initiation of thrombolysis more difficult.

MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (OM2061b.jpg)

Acute coronary syndrome

This term encompasses a range of coronary artery diseases, including unstable angina and both ST-segment elevation and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Diagnosis requires an ECG and a careful clinical review. In acute coronary syndrome, common ECG abnormalities include T-wave tenting or inversion, ST-segment elevation or depression including J-point elevation in multiple leads and pathological Q waves.8

Bundle branch block

Right bundle branch block may occur as a congenital anomaly or in associated with volume overload in the right ventricle. Left bundle branch block is almost always pathological, reflecting disease of the left ventricle. There are left and right bundles but the left has an anterior and posterior fascicle.

  • Right bundle branch block produces a prolonged QRS, usually about 160 msecs or 4 small squares and a RSR pattern seen best in V1. There may well be T wave changes in the septal leads.
  • Left anterior hemiblock produces an axis of more than +30°, an initial R in II, III and aVF, Q in I and S in III.
  • Left posterior hemiblock is rarer. There is right axis deviation, S in I and Q in III.
  • Complete left bundle branch block produces a longer QRS, usually around 200 msec with a more square pattern than RBBB. The changes are best seen in the lateral V leads. There may also be some ST elevation or depression.
Axis deviation

Causes of Left Axis Deviation:

  • Left anterior hemiblock
  • Inferior myocardial infarction
  • Pacemaker
  • Emphysema
  • Hyperkalaemia
  • Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome
  • Ostium primum atrial septal defect.
  • Some authorities say that left ventricular hypertrophy causes LAD whilst others are adamant that it does not.

Causes of Right Axis Deviation

Causes of Extreme Axis Deviation

  • Emphysema
  • Hyperkalaemia.
  • Pacemaker
  • Ventricular tachycardia
Causes of ST segment changes
  • Digoxin produces a down sloping ST depression.
  • Pericarditis causes ST elevation that tends to be generalised and not located to the area supplied by one coronary artery.
  • Ventricular aneurism causes ST elevation. This usually follows a large anterior infarct and if the ST segment fails to return to the baseline an echocardiogram is required to exclude aneurysm.
  • ST depression suggests ischaemia and/or unstable angina. Extensive ST depressions with a clinical picture of MI can indicate subendocardial damage.
Right ventricular hypertrophy

The R wave is bigger than the S in V1.

T waves
  • Inverted T waves in a predominantly positive lead suggest ischaemia or old MI. T waves should be upright in V3 to V6.
  • Tall T waves occur in the acute phase of MI and in hyperkalaemia.
Misplaced leads

Wrongly attached leads, such as left and right arm reversed, will produce abnormalities in the tracing. This is a standard "trick question" in the MRCP(UK). It is a justified question because in real life, it happens.

  • If the 2 ankle leads are reversed, it will make little difference.
  • If the F lead is reversed with one of the arm leads, the ECG will seem very strange except in the V leads. There may be extreme axis deviation.
  • If the left and right arm leads are reversed, lead I will show inverted P and T with a predominantly negative QRS whilst V leads are normal. Dextrocardia will show a similar pattern in lead I but leads V1 to V6 will show remarkably little change across their course. Misplacement of the arm leads is much more common than dextrocardia.
Pulmonary embolism

Traditional teaching is that S in 1 and Q and inverted T in III are features of pulmonary embolism. It is taught as S1,Q3,T3. However, where the diagnosis has not already been made this is of no value.9

Learning to read ECGs

A written text like this is of limited value in helping to acquire the expertise to read ECGs. Practice looking at tracings is essential. For that reason several websites have been given where samples of ECGs can be seen and interpreted. They all have text to accompany them.


Document references
  1. Brailer DJ, Kroch E, Pauly MV; The impact of computer-assisted test interpretation on physician decision making: the case of electrocardiograms. Med Decis Making. 1997 Jan-Mar;17(1):80-6. [abstract]
  2. De Bacquer D, De Backer G, Kornitzer M; Prevalences of ECG findings in large population based samples of men and women. Heart. 2000 Dec;84(6):625-33. [abstract]
  3. Sharma S, Whyte G, Elliott P, et al; Electrocardiographic changes in 1000 highly trained junior elite athletes. Br J Sports Med. 1999 Oct;33(5):319-24. [abstract]
  4. Sox HC Jr, Garber AM, Littenberg B; The resting electrocardiogram as a screening test. A clinical analysis. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Sep 15;111(6):489-502. [abstract]
  5. Beyerbacht HP, Bax JJ, Lamb HJ, et al; Evaluation of ECG criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy before and after aortic valve replacement using magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2003 Jul;5(3):465-74. [abstract]
  6. Larsen CT, Dahlin J, Blackburn H, et al; Prevalence and prognosis of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy, ST segment depression and negative T-wave; the Copenhagen City Heart Study. Eur Heart J. 2002 Feb;23(4):315-24. [abstract]
  7. Massel D; Observer variability in ECG interpretation for thrombolysis eligibility: experience and context matter. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2003 Jun;15(3):131-40. [abstract]
  8. American Family Physician; Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome. Vol. 72/No. 1 (July 1, 2005).
  9. Rodger M, Makropoulos D, Turek M, et al; Diagnostic value of the electrocardiogram in suspected pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol. 2000 Oct 1;86(7):807-9, A10. [abstract]

Internet and further reading Acknowledgements EMIS is grateful to the Mentor authoring team for writing this article. The final copy has passed scrutiny by the independent Mentor GP reviewing team. ©EMIS 2007.
DocID: 2085
Document Version: 21
DocRef: bgp508
Last Updated: 8 Nov 2007
Review Date: 7 Nov 2009






Patient News










Disclaimer: Patient UK has no control over the content of any external links above. Inclusion does not imply endorsement by Patient UK.

Want to advertise on this site? Find out how >>








Disclaimer: Patient UK has no control over the content of any external links above. Inclusion does not imply endorsement by Patient UK.

Want to advertise on this site? Find out how >>


PS - Health and Poverty

Perhaps the biggest cause of ill health in the world is poverty. Help to Make Poverty History. For example, why not lend some of your money to disadvantaged communities to enable them to trade their way out of poverty through schemes such as Shared Interest.

See also MAKEPOVERTYHISTORY North East for details and links to campaigns against poverty.

^ Top of Page