Retinal Vein Occlusions

oPatientPlus articles are written by UK doctors and are based on research evidence, UK and European Guidelines. They are designed for health professionals to use, so you may find the language more technical than the condition leaflets.

Retinal vein occlusions (RVOs) are the second most common type of retinal vascular disorder after diabetic retinal disease.[1] They can occur at almost any age (although typically in middle to later years - most in those aged over 65 years) and their severity ranges from asymptomatic to a painful eye with severe visual impairment.

Retinal vein occlusion is one of the most common causes of sudden painless unilateral loss of vision. Loss of vision is usually secondary to macular oedema. Occlusion may occur in the central retinal vein or branch retinal vein.[2] 

Occlusion of the retinal venous system by thrombus formation is the most common cause but other causes include disease of the vein wall and external compression of the vein.[3] Retinal arteries and arterioles and their corresponding veins share a common adventitial sheath. It is thought that the thickening of the arteriole compresses the vein, eventually causing occlusion.

A backlog of stagnated blood combined with associated hypoxia results in extravasation of blood constituents, causing further stagnation and so on, resulting in the creation of a vicious circle of events. Ischaemic damage to the retina stimulates increased production of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) which, in turn, may lead to neovascularisation - a process that can result in haemorrhage (as the new vessels are of poor quality) or neovascular glaucoma (the new vessels grow into the aqueous drainage system, so clogging it up). Factors contributing to this pathophysiology include:[3]

  • Advancing age.
  • Systemic conditions such as hypertension (found in 64% of patients with RVO[3]), hyperlipidaemia, diabetes, smoking and obesity.
  • Raised intraocular pressure.
  • Inflammatory diseases such as sarcoidosis, Behçet's syndrome.
  • Hyperviscosity states such as myeloma.
  • Thrombophilic disorders.

There are more unusual associations, including chronic kidney disease, other secondary causes of hypertension and diabetes (eg, Cushing's syndrome), secondary causes of hyperlipidaemia (eg, hypothyroidism), polyarteritis nodosa, Wegener's granulomatosis and Goodpasture's syndrome.[3]

Save time & improve your PDP on Patient.co.uk

  • Notes Add notes to any clinical page and create a reflective diary
  • Track Automatically track and log every page you have viewed
  • Print Print and export a summary to use in your appraisal
Click to find out more »

Branch retinal vein occlusions (BRVOs) are three times more common than central retinal vein occlusions (CRVOs).[3] There are various subclassifications of this depending on whether a major branch, a minor macular branch or a peripheral branch is affected. Each carries its own prognosis. A hemiretinal vein occlusion refers to an occlusion that is proximal enough to affect half of the retinal drainage (ie the superior or inferior portion) as opposed to the smaller portion affected by a BRVO.

Presentation

This largely depends on the amount of compromise to macular drainage. The most common presentation is of unilateral, painless blurred vision, metamorphopsia (image distortion) ± a field defect (usually altitudinal). Peripheral occlusions may be asymptomatic. Visual acuity depends on the degree of macular involvement. Fundoscopy will reveal vascular dilatation and tortuosity of the affected vessels, with associated haemorrhages in that area only (look for an arc of haemorrhages, like a trail left behind a cartoon image of a shooting star).

Management

  • Refer within 24 hours to an on-call ophthalmologist.
  • Management depends on the area and degree of occlusion.
  • Some patients benefit from panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) laser treatment if they develop macular oedema (where visual acuity is ≤6/12 and there is no spontaneous improvement by 3-6 months) or neovascularisation.[3] 
  • They will be monitored in an outpatient clinic.
  • Treatment with triamcinolone produces anatomical and functional improvement of macular oedema due to BRVO. This is similar to the results from laser treatment. However, there is a higher incidence of raised intraocular pressure, incidence of cataract formation and progression and need for cataract surgery than in patients having laser treatment.[3] 
  • Dexamethasone biodegradable implants are licensed for treatment of macular oedema secondary to BRVO.
  • Use of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) for BRVO is currently off-licence but has been shown to have sustained benefit for macular oedema resulting from BRVO.[4] 

Complications

These are similar to those of CRVO. New vessels tend to occur only when at least one quadrant of the retina is affected, and appear about six months after the original occlusion.[3] The rate of complication for hemiretinal vein occlusions is greater than that of BRVO but less than that of CRVO.

Outcome

The outcome is reasonably good depending on the number of collateral veins that develop. 50% of patients return to a visual acuity of 6/12 or better. Over half will develop macular oedema and about one in five may develop retinal neovascularisation.

CRVO has two broad categories, which may overlap:

  • The milder form of the disease is non-ischaemic CRVO (accounting for ~75% of CRVOs). This may resolve fully with good visual outcome or progress to the ischaemic type.
  • The severe form of the disease is ischaemic CRVO. Patients may be left with neovascular glaucoma and a painful eye with severe visual impairment.

In some cases, the cut-off between the two can be arbitrarily based on angiographic findings but it is a useful predictor of outcome and complication development.

Epidemiology

This is a common condition with a reported incidence of 7 per 1,000 at 49-60 years and 46 per 1,000 at 80 years. There is an equal sex distribution.[3]

Presentation

The patient (usually aged >50) frequently presents with sudden unilateral painless loss of vision or blurred vision, often starting on waking.[5]

  • Non-ischaemic - mild or absent afferent pupillary defect. There are widespread dot-blot and flame haemorrhages throughout the fundus and some disc oedema.
  • Ischaemic - severe visual impairment with a marked afferent pupillary defect. The fundus looks similar to the non-ischaemic picture but disc oedema is more severe. Haemorrhages scattered throughout the fundus in typical blood-storm pattern with cotton wool spots (sparse scattered haemorrhages with less complete blockage). There may occasionally be an associated retinal detachment.
RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION

Differential diagnosis

Management

Currently, there are no proven treatment options available so management has the twofold aim of identifying/managing modifiable risk factors and recognising/treating complications. Where there is development of severe visual impairment due to a secondary complication (eg, neovascular glaucoma), the management aim is to keep the eye pain-free.

  • Refer within 24 hours to the on-call ophthalmologist.
  • The ophthalmologist will seek certain features that distinguish ischaemic from non-ischaemic CRVO. The former will be observed every 2 to 3 months ± treated with laser (panretinal photocoagulation) should any neovascularisation - particularly around the iris - occur.[3]
  • Reduction of intraocular pressure is needed if this is elevated.
  • Intravitreal anti-VEGF agents:
    • In combination with use of laser panretinal photocoagulation (PRP), should be used when iris new vessels or angle new vessels are visible.[3]
    • PRP results in dramatic regression of the new vessels. The effect is short-lived and new vessels recur commonly, so repeated treatment (typically every six weeks) with these agents (and PRP) may be required.
    • Intravitreal aflibercept injection is recommended as an option for treating visual impairment caused by macular oedema secondary to CRVO.[6] 
  • Intravitreal triamcinolone has been proposed as a treatment option for some of the associated complications (macular oedema and optic neuropathy) but has no proven effect on anterior neovascularisation.[3]
  • Intravitreal steroids have also been studied with regards to treating post-CRVO macular oedema. Currently, the response has been found to be positive but limited temporally and there are a number of complicating side-effects.[1]
  • Other experimental treatments are being investigated (particularly operative) but are still in early stages in their respective trials. Laser-induced chorioretinal venous anastomosis (L-CRA) has been used as a treatment for non-ischaemic CRVO. Where an anastomosis was successfully made, significant improvement was noted in visual acuity at 18 months after follow-up.[7]
  • Any underlying modifiable risk factors will need to be identified and addressed.

Complications

  • Retinal neovascularisation (and secondary glaucoma or vitreous haemorrhage - the '90-day glaucoma').
  • Macular oedema ± lamellar or full-thickness macular hole.
  • Permanent macular degeneration or 'cellophane maculopathy'.
  • Optic atrophy.

Outcome

Most have persisting reduced central vision due to long-term macular oedema. Occasionally, vision may improve without treatment.

  • Non-ischaemic - fewer than 10% recover normal visual acuity. Most have persistent visual impairment and a third develop ischaemic CRVO within three years. The prognosis of the remaining cases depends on the visual acuity at presentation. Those with 6/18 or better are likely to stay that way; there is a variable prognosis between 6/18 and 6/60 and a very poor visual prognosis at 6/60 or less.
  • Ischaemic - this is very poor on account of macular oedema and ischaemia. >90% will have impaired vision of 6/60 or worse. About 50% of patients develop neovascularisation around the iris (rubeosis iridis), usually between 2 and 4 months and so need careful monitoring around this time, as they may require PRP.[3] 60% develop neovascularisation.

There is no risk of increased long-term mortality (in contrast to retinal artery occlusion). However, there is a risk of developing CRVO in the fellow eye.

These are common to both central and branch vein occlusions and should help to identify systemic problems. All patients should have:[3]

  • BP (the most common association with BRVO).
  • Blood glucose and lipids (if abnormal, TFTs too).
  • FBC, ESR.
  • Plasma protein electrophoresis.
  • ECG.

Depending on individual circumstances (eg, a young patient), other tests may include:

  • Thrombophilia screen including antiphospholipid antibodies and lupus anticoagulant.
  • CRP, serum ACE, auto-antibodies, CXR, fasting homocysteine levels.

In the eye clinic, further evaluation includes:

  • Measurement of intraocular pressure.
  • Fluorescein angiography is the investigation of choice in CRVO. It evaluates retinal capillary non-perfusion, neovascularisation and macular oedema. It is not often necessary in BRVO.[3]
  • Optical coherence tomography (OCT) scan. This is non-invasive, transpupillary imaging. It measures the retina and can detect macular oedema that fluorescein angiography has missed because of blockage from haemorrhage.[8] 

The ophthalmology team is primarily concerned with the diagnosis of RVO and the management of the ocular complications. Baseline investigations should be carried out by the ophthalmology team at the time of diagnosis. It is also their responsibility to impart this information effectively to the patient's GP, as underlying risk factors need to be assessed and addressed urgently. Rarer causes (such as those encountered in younger patients) need managing by relevant specialists. Initiation of medical management should occur within two months of diagnosis.

Risk factors have been identified in 'Pathophysiology', above. The principal area of investigation and management will be the cardiovascular risk factors. See the separate article on Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease.

Issues which may arise in the context of general practice

  • Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) - historically, HRT was contra-indicated and discontinued in women experiencing an RVO. However, more recent studies have shown that continued use does not appear to be associated with a higher rate of recurrence. Thus, although it is not advised to start it following an RVO, the decision as to whether to continue previously prescribed HRT can now be made on a case-by-case basis depending on the menopausal symptoms experienced by the patient.
  • The management of younger patients - although the visual outcome in this group of patients appears to be better, RVOs are associated with underlying systemic conditions which should be managed appropriately. In females, the most common association is with the oral contraceptive pill. Thus, an RVO is a contra-indication for this. Sometimes, no underlying cause can be found despite extensive investigations - this group presents a management problem and is likely to be under ophthalmological observation for a much longer period of time.

Further reading & references

  1. Gewaily D, Greenberg PB; Intravitreal steroids versus observation for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD007324. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007324.pub2
  2. Chong V; Branch retinal vein occlusion. BMJ. 2012 Dec 10;345:e8373. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e8373.
  3. Interim Guidelines for Management of Retinal Vein Occlusion; Royal College of Ophthalmologists (December 2010)
  4. Brown DM, Campochiaro PA, Bhisitkul RB, et al; Sustained benefits from ranibizumab for macular edema following branch retinal Ophthalmology. 2011 Aug;118(8):1594-602.
  5. Retinal Vein Occlusion; Handbook of Ocular Disease Management
  6. Aflibercept for treating visual impairment caused by macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion, NICE Technology appraisal (Feb 2014)
  7. McAllister IL, Gillies ME, Smithies LA, et al; The Central Retinal Vein Bypass Study: a trial of laser-induced chorioretinal Ophthalmology. 2010 May;117(5):954-65. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
  8. Figurska M, Robaszkiewicz J, Wierzbowska J; Optical coherence tomography in imaging of macular diseases. Klin Oczna. 2010;112(4-6):138-46.

Disclaimer: This article is for information only and should not be used for the diagnosis or treatment of medical conditions. EMIS has used all reasonable care in compiling the information but make no warranty as to its accuracy. Consult a doctor or other health care professional for diagnosis and treatment of medical conditions. For details see our conditions.

Original Author:
Dr Hayley Willacy
Current Version:
Peer Reviewer:
Dr Hannah Gronow
Last Checked:
16/04/2014
Document ID:
1923 (v23)
© EMIS

Common searches for this page include: retinal vein occlusion, retinal vein occlusion symptoms, symptoms of retinal vein occlusion, retinal vein occlusion treatment, treatment for retinal vein occlusion, what causes retinal vein occlusion