oPatientPlus articles are written by UK doctors and are based on research evidence, UK and European Guidelines. They are designed for health professionals to use, so you may find the language more technical than the condition leaflets.

Synonyms: age-related hearing loss, presbyacusia, presbyacousia, senile deafness (the latter term is discouraged due to its negative connotations)

This is a progressive, usually bilateral, sensorineural hearing loss that occurs in older people as they age. It is a multifactorial process driven by environmental factors and exacerbated by concurrent disease.[1] The word may be used as an umbrella term to cover all causes of diminution of hearing in the elderly.

It can range from bothersome to severely disabling in its effects on the sufferer. In moderate-to-severe cases it can cause the older person to become isolated and depressed, and may significantly worsen age-related disability/cognitive impairment and dementia.[2] Additionally, while loss in peripheral hearing sensitivity explains many of the listening problems of elderly persons, some studies suggest that age-related declines in general cognitive skill and central auditory processing also appear to contribute.[1]

It is eminently correctable using rehabilitative measures and its successful treatment can vastly improve quality of life for the older patient. Unfortunately, it is not a fashionable or socially appreciated problem meaning that it is largely unrecognised and undertreated in the older population at large. Screening by elderly care specialists and primary care physicians, with referral for appropriate therapy, can make a positive and tangible difference to the lives of older people.

You may find the separate articles Deafness in Adults and Dealing with Hearing Impaired Patients useful, with information on examination, an overview of treatment options and managing a consultation with a deaf person. You may also find the separate article Tinnitus relevant.

NEW - log your activity

  • Notes Add notes to any clinical page and create a reflective diary
  • Track Automatically track and log every page you have viewed
  • Print Print and export a summary to use in your appraisal
Click to find out more »

Loss of cochlear outer hair cells, ganglion cell loss in vestibulocochlear nerve fibres and atrophy of the highly vascular stria in the lateral cochlear wall (thought to be the most important factor) all contribute to the process. Stiffness of the cochlear basilar membrane (cochlear conductive deafness) was considered to contribute but is now thought to be of minor relevance. It is not ageing of itself that causes the problem, rather the effects accumulated from environmental noise toxicity and metabolic/oxidative stress. Degenerative central nervous mechanisms (central presbyacusis) can cause poor speech discrimination in some individuals (~10%) but is unusual in isolation and difficult to distinguish from peripheral causes. Central presbyacusis may still be improved by treatment aimed at peripheral mechanisms.


The vast majority of the UK's 9 million deaf or hard of hearing population have developed hearing loss over time. After 50 years of age, the incidence of deafness rises sharply - 55% of the over 60 year-old population have some degree of hearing impairment.[4] About 80% of cases of significant hearing impairment occur in this age group.[5][6] The vast majority of people aged over 70 will have some degree of objective hearing impairment or subjective worsening compared with their youth.[7] The effect of noise pollution means that hearing loss is more prevalent among older people in industrialised compared with agrarian societies.[3]

Risk factors

It is unclear whether these factors act in specific, pathological ways or whether they accelerate an underlying process.[1] Interestingly, moderate alcohol consumption has been found to be inversely correlated with hearing loss.[8]


Problems are often first noted in noisy environments; there is usually a slow, insidious onset of symptoms with gradual progression. However, some people may feel their hearing has suddenly worsened due to crossing a 'threshold' where the symptoms become noticeable. (It is also known that the rate of hearing decline is a highly variable, non-linear process.)[1]

The ability to understand speech is often the earliest symptom as high frequency hearing loss predominates.[1] It may be the patient's friends/relatives who note the problem, rather than the sufferer. Discrimination of the voiceless consonants (t, p, k, f, s and ch) becomes difficult as the condition progresses (patients may complain of others mumbling). Patients complain that they cannot understand what is being said rather than of an inability to hear. Words like 'mash', 'math' and 'map' become indistinguishable. Patients can usually manage a one-to-one conversation but struggle when there is more than one speaker and when there is background noise.

When assessing elderly patients with depression or cognitive impairment, hearing loss should be directly asked about and considered as a cause of the symptoms. Tinnitus may be a feature of presbyacusis when the hearing impairment becomes marked, and should be directly asked about. It can be very disturbing and disabling.


There are no definitive signs of presbyacusis. Auroscopy may reveal wax (cerumen) accumulation. 10% sodium bicarbonate drops will help to dissolve this and may improve symptoms, when reassessment can take place. Opacification of the tympanic membrane is a normal feature of ageing and does not affect the acoustic efficiency of the ear.

Presbyacusis is a diagnosis of exclusion and should not be made as a blanket diagnosis in the elderly person with hearing loss until other possible causes have been considered and excluded/thought unlikely. Consider:

It is a good idea to conduct screening for presbyacusis in patients aged over 60. Asking "Do you have a hearing problem?" on new-patient questionnaires or during health checks for older people is a very cost-effective and sensitive instrument to screen for this condition. It has been shown to be more sensitive than more complex screening questionnaires.[13]

Clinical spoken voice and finger friction tests may be considered[14] but some claim that these are imprecise and ineffective. Use of audiometry to screen patients and/or confirm the diagnosis is very effective and modern equipment is easy to use, cost-effective, lightweight, well-accepted by patients and can be easily used in a community setting. Testing should be carried out at frequencies of 1, 2 and 3 kHz at intensity levels of 25, 40 and 60 dB. Failure at any frequency at 25 dB (for younger adults) or 40 dB (for retired persons) justifies referral for definitive assessment.

Further investigation such as neuro-imaging is not required unless there are clinical reasons to suspect an underlying pathology, eg unilateral or significantly asymmetric hearing loss or troublesome tinnitus out of keeping with the severity of hearing loss on the audiogram. Tests for diabetes, renal impairment, hypertension or dyslipidaemia are worthwhile in individuals who have not been checked recently for these problems.

  • Communication courtesy and environmental noise manipulation - both speaker and listener should work at improving communication. Speakers should be face-to-face, reduce competing sounds where possible, and should speak in a clear and unhurried manner. Listeners should repeat what was heard to allow misunderstandings to be corrected. In addition, it may help to give out written material or to give explanation to family and friends.
  • Reassurance and education - patients often find it very reassuring to know that they will not go completely deaf. It has been shown that proactive communication education programmes have an important role to play in the management of these patients. This may be as an adjunct to - or even replace - more traditional interventions (eg hearing aid fitting - see below).[15]
  • Amplification - usually indicated when average hearing thresholds reach 40 dB on audiogram but lesser hearing loss can still benefit. Aids are available both on the NHS and privately; privately sold aids are not necessarily better than those obtained on the NHS.
    • There is a staggering variety of hearing aids using analogue or digital amplification; currently, it appears that digital aids are superior.
    • There are ongoing advances in directional microphones and noise-suppression circuitry which continue to improve performance.
    • Hearing aids have problems about which patients should be counselled: normal hearing is not restored, it takes time to learn to use and adapt to one optimally, they can be uncomfortable or cosmetically undesirable and they are expensive. However, they remain the mainstay of managing presbyacusis and are particularly helpful to those with severe hearing loss.
    • Patients should be encouraged to persevere if background amplification is annoying as they will adapt to this. Intermittent use because of this problem prevents central adaptation and should be advised against.
    • Good education about use of hearing aids maximises their benefits.
  • Speech reading - use of facial visual cues and study of lip movements aids understanding of speech. Formal training in these skills may be difficult to come by.
  • Auditory training - structured learning to help recognise speech sounds and key words with amplification. This takes some effort and training centres are thin on the ground.
  • Assistive listening devices - these include flashing light alarms, eg for doorbell or smoke alarm, amplified telephones, teleconnectors for hearing aids/phones, frequency-modulation transmitters (an FM microphone/transmitter and receiver) and other devices. They can make a great difference to people's lives. Hearing dogs are also used. More information is available on the Royal National Institute for Deaf People (RNID) website.[4]
  • Cochlear implants[16] - these are indicated for any patient, regardless of age, who has bilateral severe hearing loss not materially improved by hearing aids. The older patient will probably do well due to good language skills and relatively short duration of deafness. Good outcomes have been reported for cochlear implants in patients with presbyacusis.[17]

Recent developments

Active middle-ear implant:[18]

  • This is a prosthesis implanted in the middle ear, which mechanically vibrates the middle-ear structures.
  • It can be useful in patients with mild-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss, who are unable to wear conventional hearing aids.
  • There is little research so far on its use specifically in elderly or presbyacusis patients.[19]

Electric acoustic stimulation:[20]

  • This is the combined use of a hearing aid and cochlear implant.
  • It involves preserving existing residual acoustic hearing (low-frequency) in an ear, with the addition of a cochlear implant for the missing high frequencies to produce speech understanding.
  • Again, there is little research so far in respect of its use in the elderly, although some studies suggest benefit above that of a cochlear implant alone.[19]

Untreated presbyacusis leads to social isolation, and depression, and may cause or worsen cognitive impairment and dementia.[1][2][3]

The stereotypical image of old age as an inevitable decline into severe deafness is not warranted. Early identification and management of presbyacusis can significantly improve the lives of older people and help to change this picture.

Some sensory presbyacusis is inevitable but avoiding noise exposure and using ear protection in noisy environments will prevent some progressive damage. Younger patients should be informed of the danger of repeated and prolonged noise exposure in clubs/at music events. Good diet, general health and fitness can reduce cardiovascular contribution to hearing loss.[3] The role of anti-oxidants in the management and prevention of hearing loss is still being investigated but a recent review suggests promising results for the future.[21]

Further reading & references

  1. Liu XZ, Yan D; Ageing and hearing loss. J Pathol. 2007 Jan;211(2):188-97.
  2. Dalton DS, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BE, et al; The impact of hearing loss on quality of life in older adults. Gerontologist. 2003 Oct;43(5):661-8.
  3. Gates GA, Mills JH; Presbycusis. Lancet. 2005 Sep 24-30;366(9491):1111-20.
  4. Action on Hearing Loss
  5. Davis AC; Epidemiological profile of hearing impairments: the scale and nature of the problem with special reference to the elderly. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1990;476:23-31.
  6. Ohlemiller KK; Age-related hearing loss: the status of Schuknecht's typology. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Oct;12(5):439-43.
  7. Wilson DH, Walsh PG, Sanchez L, et al; The epidemiology of hearing impairment in an Australian adult population. Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Apr;28(2):247-52.
  8. Fransen E, Topsakal V, Hendrickx JJ, et al; Occupational Noise, Smoking, and a High Body Mass Index are Risk Factors for Age-related Hearing Impairment and Moderate Alcohol Consumption is Protective: A European Population-based Multicenter Study. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2008 Jun 10
  9. Seidman MD, Ahmad N, Joshi D, et al; Age-related hearing loss and its association with reactive oxygen species and mitochondrial DNA damage. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2004 May;(552):16-24.
  10. McMahon CM, Kifley A, Rochtchina E, et al; The Contribution of Family History to Hearing Loss in an Older Population. Ear Hear. 2008 May 8;.
  11. Roland PS et al, Presbyacusis, Medscape, Mar 2010
  12. Maia CA, Campos CA; Diabetes mellitus as etiological factor of hearing loss. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed). 2005 Mar-Apr;71(2):208-14. Epub 2005 Aug 2.
  13. Gates GA, Murphy M, Rees TS, et al; Screening for handicapping hearing loss in the elderly. J Fam Pract. 2003 Jan;52(1):56-62.
  14. Pirozzo S, Papinczak T, Glasziou P; Whispered voice test for screening for hearing impairment in adults and children: systematic review. BMJ. 2003 Oct 25;327(7421):967.
  15. Hickson L, Worrall L, Scarinci N; A randomized controlled trial evaluating the active communication education program for older people with hearing impairment. Ear Hear. 2007 Apr;28(2):212-30.
  16. Hearing impairment - cochlear implants; NICE Technology Appraisal Guidance, January 2009
  17. Sprinzl GM, Riechelmann H; Current trends in treating hearing loss in elderly people: a review of the Gerontology. 2010;56(3):351-8. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
  18. Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust; Auditory Implant Programme: The Middle Ear Implant (MEI) -Information for Referrers.
  19. Wagner F, Todt I, Wagner J, et al; Indications and candidacy for active middle ear implants. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;69:20-6. Epub 2010 Jul 5.
  20. Turner CW, Reiss LA, Gantz BJ; Combined acoustic and electric hearing: preserving residual acoustic hearing. Hear Res. 2008 Aug;242(1-2):164-71. Epub 2007 Nov 29.
  21. Darrat I, Ahmad N, Seidman K, et al; Auditory research involving antioxidants. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Oct;15(5):358-63.

Disclaimer: This article is for information only and should not be used for the diagnosis or treatment of medical conditions. EMIS has used all reasonable care in compiling the information but make no warranty as to its accuracy. Consult a doctor or other health care professional for diagnosis and treatment of medical conditions. For details see our conditions.

Original Author:
Dr Sean Kavanagh
Current Version:
Peer Reviewer:
Dr Helen Huins
Document ID:
2659 (v23)
Last Checked:
Next Review: