Haematuria

oPatientPlus articles are written by UK doctors and are based on research evidence, UK and European Guidelines. They are designed for health professionals to use, so you may find the language more technical than the condition leaflets.

Blood may originate from the kidney or the collecting system. Urine testing for haematuria should only be performed for identifiable clinical reasons; there is currently no evidence to support opportunistic screening of the general population.[1]

  • Visible haematuria (VH): also called macroscopic haematuria or gross haematuria.
  • Non-visible haematuria (NVH): also called microscopic haematuria or dipstick-positive haematuria:
    • Symptomatic non-visible haematuria (s-NVH): associated symptoms include voiding lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS): hesitancy, frequency, urgency, dysuria.
    • Asymptomatic non-visible haematuria (a-NVH): incidental detection in the absence of LUTS or upper urinary tract symptoms.
  • Significant haematuria is defined as:
    • Any single episode of VH.
    • Any single episode of s-NVH (in absence of urinary tract infection (UTI) or other transient causes).
    • Persistent a-NVH (in absence of UTI or other transient causes). Persistence is defined as 2 out of 3 dipsticks positive for NVH.

NEW - log your activity

  • Notes Add notes to any clinical page and create a reflective diary
  • Track Automatically track and log every page you have viewed
  • Print Print and export a summary to use in your appraisal
Click to find out more »
  • The prevalence of asymptomatic microscopic haematuria varies from 0.19% to as high as 21%.[2]
  • In one study of 1,000 patients with haematuria (but no proteinuria), the common causes of haematuria were inflammatory conditions of the urethra and prostate, benign prostatic hypertrophy, cystitis, transitional carcinoma of the bladder, and stones in the renal pelvis or ureter. 8% had some form of renal tract malignancy.[3]
  • In a screening study of men aged over 50 years, pathological conditions were found in 31 out of 44 who had haematuria at least once on serial testing. One third of the 44 had either cancer of the urinary tract or other conditions requiring immediate treatment.

Common causes include UTI, bladder tumours, urinary tract stones, urethritis, benign prostatic hypertrophy and prostate cancer.

Other causes of red or dark urine:

  • Take a full urological history and include palpation of the abdomen, and blood pressure.
  • Features suggesting a renal cause include hypertension, altered renal function tests, proteinuria, known previous renal problems, renal mass and glomerular red cells in urine.
  • Haematuria without proteinuria does not necessarily indicate a non-glomerular origin, as glomerular bleeding is not necessarily accompanied by proteinuria.[4]

Transient causes that need to be excluded before establishing the presence of significant haematuria are UTI, exercise-induced haematuria or, rarely, myoglobinuria, and menstruation.[1]

  • All children with haematuria should be referred.
  • All definite haematuria, whether macroscopic or microscopic, requires investigation to exclude serious underlying conditions, especially urinary tract neoplasm.[1]
  • Patients on anticoagulants should also be investigated. Anticoagulants are more likely to provoke, rather than be the cause of, haematuria.

    Initial investigations for a patient with s-NVH and persistent a-NVH[1]

    • Exclude UTI and/or other transient cause.
    • Plasma creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).
    • Measure proteinuria: send urine for protein:creatinine ratio (PCR) or albumin:creatinine ratio (ACR) on a random sample (according to local practice). 24-hour urine collections for protein are rarely required. An approximation to the 24-hour urine protein or albumin excretion (in milligrams) is obtained by multiplying the ratio (in mg/mmol) x10.
    • Measurement of blood pressure.
    Other initial investigations may include:
    • FBC (anaemia) and clotting screen.
    • Urine red cell morphology: dysmorphic erythrocytes suggest a renal origin.
    • Cytological examination of urine.[5]

    Indications for urological referral[1]

    Direct referral to urology for further investigation is required for:
    • All patients with visible haematuria; a nephrology referral may be considered more appropriate if glomerulonephritis is suspected.
    • All patients with s-NVH (any age).
    • All patients with a-NVH aged ≥40 years.

    Indications for nephrological referral[1]

    • For patients who have had a urological cause excluded or have not met the referral criteria for a urological assessment, a referral to nephrology should be considered.
    • Evidence of declining GFR (by greater than 10 ml/minute at any stage within the previous five years or by greater than 5 ml/minute within the previous one year).
    • Stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease (eGFR less than 30 ml/minute).
    • Significant proteinuria (ACR 30 mg/mmol or higher, or PCR 50 mg/mmol or higher).
    • Isolated haematuria (ie in the absence of significant proteinuria) with hypertension in those aged younger than 40 years.
    • Visible haematuria coinciding with intercurrent (usually upper respiratory tract) infection.

    Long-term monitoring of patients with haematuria[1]

    Patients not meeting criteria for referral or who have had negative urological or nephrological investigations (including all of: eGFR 60 ml/minute or higher, and ACR less than 30 mg/mmol or PCR less than 50 mg/mmol, and blood pressure less than 140/90 mm Hg) need long-term monitoring due to the uncertainty of the underlying diagnosis. Patients should be monitored for the development of:
    • Voiding lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).
    • Visible haematuria.
    • Significant or increasing proteinuria.
    • Progressive renal impairment (falling eGFR).
    • Hypertension (the development of hypertension in older people may have no relation to the haematuria).
    Primary care monitoring should include an annual assessment (whilst haematuria persists) of blood pressure, eGFR and ACR/PCR.
    • Referral or re-referral to urology is indicated if development of VH or s-NVH.[1]
    • Referral to nephrology if:[1]
      • Significant or increasing proteinuria (ACR higher than 30 mg/mmol or PCR higher than 50 mg/mmol).
      • eGFR less than 30 ml/minute (confirmed on at least two readings and without an identifiable reversible cause).
      • Deteriorating eGFR (by greater than 5 ml/minute fall within one year, or greater than 10 ml/minute fall within five years).

    NICE referral guideline

    The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Cancer Referral Guidelines recommend urgent referral for:[6]
    • Patients of any age with painless macroscopic haematuria.
    • Patients aged 40 years and older who present with recurrent or persistent UTI associated with haematuria.
    • Patients aged 50 years and older who are found to have unexplained microscopic haematuria.
    • Patients with an abdominal mass identified clinically or on imaging that is thought to arise from the urinary tract.

    Further investigations

    • Ultrasound of the renal tract: if urinalysis does not explain the findings. Ultrasound is as sensitive as intravenous urography and more cost-effective.[7] A plain film of the abdomen should also be obtained, mainly to rule out urinary calculi.
    • Cystoscopy: important in younger, as well as in older, patients. One study, looking at almost 2,000 patients with haematuria, found bladder cancer in 7 patients aged younger than 40 years.[8]
    • Intravenous urography is indicated if urinary tract stones are suspected or if ultrasound, abdominal X-ray and cystoscopy are negative.
    • Renal angiography, CT scanning or renal biopsy are indicated in specific circumstances.
    If a definite diagnosis cannot be made, investigations should be repeated whenever gross haematuria occurs or after 4-6 months. Occult cancer will usually become evident within one year.

Further reading & references

  • Chronic kidney disease; NICE Clinical Guideline (September 2008)
  • Rodgers M et al; Diagnostic tests and algorithms used in the investigation of haematuria: systematic reviews and economic evaluation; Health Technology Assessment 2006; Vol 10: number 18
  1. Joint Consensus Statement on the Initial Assessment of Haematuria, Renal Association and British Association of Urological Surgeons (July 2008)
  2. Grossfeld GD et al; Asymptomatic Microscopic Hematuria in Adults: Summary of the AUA Best Practice Policy Recommendations. Am Fam Physician; 2001 Mar 15;63(6):1145-54.
  3. Mariani AJ, Mariani MC, Macchioni C, et al; The significance of adult hematuria: 1,000 hematuria evaluations including a risk-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis. J Urol. 1989 Feb;141(2):350-5.
  4. Savige J, Buzza M, Dagher H; Haematuria in asymptomatic individuals. BMJ. 2001 Apr 21;322(7292):942-3.
  5. Hofland CA, Mariani AJ; Is cytology required for a hematuria evaluation? J Urol. 2004 Jan;171(1):324-6.
  6. Referral for suspected cancer; NICE Clinical Guideline (2005)
  7. Spencer J, Lindsell D, Mastorakou I; Ultrasonography compared with intravenous urography in investigation of urinary tract infection in adults. BMJ. 1990 Jul 28;301(6745):221-4.
  8. Khadra MH, Pickard RS, Charlton M, et al; A prospective analysis of 1,930 patients with hematuria to evaluate current diagnostic practice. J Urol. 2000 Feb;163(2):524-7.

Disclaimer: This article is for information only and should not be used for the diagnosis or treatment of medical conditions. EMIS has used all reasonable care in compiling the information but make no warranty as to its accuracy. Consult a doctor or other health care professional for diagnosis and treatment of medical conditions. For details see our conditions.

Original Author:
Dr Colin Tidy
Current Version:
Document ID:
2216 (v24)
Last Checked:
23/05/2011
Next Review:
21/05/2016