Aortic Dissection

This PatientPlus article is written for healthcare professionals so the language may be more technical than the condition leaflets. You may find the abbreviations list helpful.

The presentation of aortic dissection can be quite variable. It is not an easy diagnosis to make and an index of suspicion is required.

Aortic dissection starts with a tear in the intima of the aortic lining. The tear allows a column of blood under pressure to enter the aortic wall, forming a haematoma which separates the intima from the adventitia and creates a false lumen.[1] The false lumen extends for a variable distance in either direction.

The most common sites for the intimal tear are within 2-3 cms of the aortic valve or distal to the left subclavian artery in the descending aorta.

The incidence is approximately 3-4 per 100,000 per year.[2]

  • Aortic dissection is the most common emergency affecting the aorta.
  • The male:female ratio varies - in one study, almost 70% of cases were in males.
  • It is most common between the ages of 50-70, being rare below the age of 40.
  • Aortic dissection is very rare in children but it has been reported in association with coarctation of the aorta.

Predisposing disease of the aorta may be:

  • Inherited (see below).
  • Degenerative.
  • Atherosclerotic.
  • Inflammatory.
  • Traumatic - eg, shearing stresses in a road traffic accident, after cardiopulmonary resuscitation, cardiac catheterisation or surgery.

Approximately 50-75% of patients with dissection will have evidence of hypertension or a previous diagnosis.[2] Other risk factors include smoking and raised cholesterol.

Inherited risks include Marfan's syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and familial thoracic aortic aneurysm type 1[3] and type 2.[4] Congenital bicuspid aortic valve is also a risk.

Cocaine use has been linked to aortic dissection, possibly as a result of the hypertension and surges of catecholamines associated with this drug.

Iatrogenic dissection may occur as a complication of cardiac catheterisation, cardiopulmonary bypass or balloon valvotomy.

Aortic dissection is usually preceded by aortic aneurysm. This is fully detailed elsewhere. The distal aorta is the most common site for aneurysm and they are at risk of rupture. However, they tend not to dissect and this site represents only about 4% of aortic dissection. Hence, aortic dissection should be seen usually as a condition of the thoracic aorta.

Classification

The Stanford classification in common use classifies the dissections into type A and type B:

  • Type A involves ascending aorta (DeBakey types I and II).
  • Type B does not involve the ascending aorta (DeBakey type III).

The DeBakey Classification:

  • Type I: aorta, aortic arch, and descending aorta (30%).
  • Type II: ascending aorta only (20%).
  • Type III: descending aorta distal to left subclavian (50%).

Acute dissection is that where the diagnosis is made within 14 days of onset. Anything of longer duration is termed chronic dissection.[2]

Further classifications have been attempted but are of little importance outside the specialist field.

Aortic dissection often presents in two phases:

  • After a first event with severe pain and pulse loss, the bleeding stops.
  • The second event starts when the pressure exceeds a critical limit and rupture occurs, either into the pericardium with cardiac tamponade or into the pleural space or mediastinum.

Fluid extravasation into the pericardium, pleural space and/or mediastinum demands urgency. Sudden death is not uncommon.

Signs and symptoms

  • The typical patient is a man in his 60s with hypertension and sudden onset of chest pain.
  • The majority of patients with aortic dissection, present with a sudden severe pain of the chest or back, classically described as 'ripping'.
  • However, some may describe mild pain in the chest, back or groin, and it is easy to dismiss such cases as musculoskeletal.
  • Hypertension.

There are a number of important features about the pain:

  • In aortic dissection, pain is abrupt in onset and maximal at the time of onset. In contrast, the pain associated with acute myocardial infarction starts slowly and gains in intensity with time. It is usually more oppressive and dull.
  • The pain migrates as the dissection progresses. This is also very important.
  • In proximal dissections, the pain is usually retrosternal, but with distal dissections the location is between the scapulae and in the back. Hypertension is typically associated with distal aortic dissection.
  • Although tearing is the classical description, the pain is described as sharp more often than tearing, ripping, or stabbing.

Other symptoms which may occur are a direct result of occlusion of smaller arteries by the dissecting process:

  • Angina due to involvement of the coronary arteries.
  • Paraplegia due to involvement of the spinal arteries.
  • Limb ischaemia due to distal aortic involvement.
  • Neurological deficit due to carotid artery involvement.
  • Pulse deficit may be present initially, may develop, or may occur transiently. There is a difference in blood pressure in limbs on the right and left side of the body.

The most important differential diagnosis is that of myocardial infarction which may co-exist with aortic dissection. Thrombolysis may well prove fatal if aortic dissection is present.

Aortic intramural haematoma is pathologically distinct with no intimal tear. However, the clinical course and mortality rates are similar in the two conditions. The haematoma may rupture through the intima, to evolve into the typical dissection.

Often the first problem is to distinguish aortic dissection from myocardial infarction. Both conditions may exist if the dissection involves the coronary ostium. For this reason, the electrocardiogram (ECG) is very important.

Electrocardiogram

  • There will be ECG signs of acute myocardial infarction if this is present and this could lead to thrombolytic therapy.
  • A normal ECG is present in one third of patients with coronary involvement and most of these patients have nonspecific ST-T segment changes.
  • About 20% of patients with type A dissection have ECG evidence of acute ischaemia or acute myocardial infarction.[5]

Imaging

Anyone with suspected aortic disease and ECG evidence of ischaemia must have diagnostic imaging before thrombolytic therapy is started, although if there is just myocardial infarction, the sooner thrombolysis is started the better. Diagnostic imaging cannot be performed in all patients presenting with myocardial ischaemia, and erroneous administration of thrombolytic therapy may be unavoidable in the occasional patient who is subsequently found to have aortic dissection.

  • CXR alone is inadequate to exclude aortic dissection.
  • Transthoracic/transoesophageal ultrasound will give an indication of site and extent of dissection.
  • CT scanning may be used to confirm the diagnosis, but is less helpful in complications and prognosis.
  • MRI scanning will confirm diagnosis, and identify involvement of other vessels, and will be increasingly useful as scanning times decrease, and with better access. Of all of the imaging modalities it has the best sensitivity (98%) and specificity (98%) for aortic dissection.[2]
  • Colour flow Doppler is useful for assessing aortic regurgitation.

Multiorgan failure is a major cause of death and results from impaired flow in abdominal arteries. Ultrasound is of limited value because of poor-quality images. Aortography and intravascular ultrasound may reveal:

  • Static narrowing of a branch artery.
  • Dynamic narrowing of a branch artery.

Both mechanisms may be present simultaneously at different levels. Angiography may be necessary to identify these mechanisms, as interpretation of MRI or CT images may be difficult. Involvement of side branches of the aorta such as the coeliac artery, mesenteric or renal arteries can be detected with intravascular ultrasound.

In aortic dissection without a distal tear (re-entry) the aorta may become totally obstructed as the true lumen is compressed by the false lumen. This will show on CT or MRI. Angiography is necessary to demonstrate the full anatomical situation including collateral flow. In the future, MRI angiography may replace conventional angiography.

General measures

  • Intravenous access.
  • Adequate analgesia - eg, morphine.
  • Transfer to an intensive care unit or high dependency unit.
  • Hypertension must be managed aggressively in all cases to reduce further damage. The aim is a systolic pressure of between 100 and 120 mm Hg.
  • Intravenous beta-blockers are usually employed, as they also reduce the force of ventricular contraction. If vasodilators are used they should be combined with beta-blockers.
  • There may be evidence of blood loss due to sequestration of blood. Separate lines are required for administration of blood and drugs.

Surgery

Surgical intervention may involve the placing of stents or grafts to the aorta but accurate assessment is essential first, as there may be entry, re-entry and multiple tears.

  • Acute type A (types I and II) dissection:
    • Surgery aims to prevent aortic rupture, pericardial tamponade and to relieve aortic regurgitation.[6]
    • Implantation of a composite graft in the ascending aorta, with or without re-implantation of coronary arteries, is performed.
  • Acute type B (type III) dissection - surgery is indicated for the following criteria:
    • Persistent, recurrent chest pain.
    • Aortic expansion.
    • Periaortic haematoma.
    • Mediastinal haematoma.

Acute dissections

Increasingly, acute dissections are treated by an endovascular approach addressing the cause of ischaemia - for example:

  • Stentgraft to proximal aorta.
  • Branch vessel stenting.
  • Uncovered stent to abdominal aorta.
  • Aortic fenestrations.

Chronic dissections

  • Patients with involvement solely of the descending aorta may be treated conservatively, as surgery is associated with a significant risk of paraplegia.
  • Surgery should be considered, however, if there is evidence of progression of the dissection.
  • Repair can be either by open surgical techniques or increasingly by endovascular approach.
  • If the aortic valve is involved it may need resuspension or replacement.

Problems arising from aortic dissection will depend on the site and extent of the involvement and if and to where the false lumen ruptures. Dissection can result in occlusion of aortic branches, with resulting damage to supplied organs. There may be occlusion of the renal, iliac, spinal or coronary arteries. Rupture of the false lumen may occur back into the aorta, or externally into the mediastinum or pericardium.

  • Hypotension indicates a poor prognosis, as it may be due to cardiac tamponade or myocardial infarction.
  • An aortic diastolic murmur occurs in 50% due to aortic regurgitation. Wide pulse pressure may be absent.
  • After a period of pain, cardiac failure may result from gross aortic regurgitation.
  • Cardiac tamponade can cause hypotension and syncope. Signs of pericardial involvement such as a pericardial friction rub, jugular venous distension or a paradoxical pulse suggest that surgical intervention may be required.
  • Sometimes pyrogens can be released from the aortic wall and cause pyrexia that will be misleading.
  • Involvement of the coeliac artery can produce persistent abdominal pain, elevation of acute phase proteins, and increase of lactate dehydrogenase.
  • Transient pulse differences suggest involvement of the brachiocephalic or subclavian arteries.
  • Neurological symptoms may be found.
  • A superior vena cava obstruction syndrome may be seen.
  • When dissection involves the distal aorta, it often involves the renal arteries. Urgent repair is required. Urine output must be closely monitored and this requires catheterisation. Monitor fluid balance and beware of hypotension with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors.
  • Diagnosis is difficult but mortality is high and increases by the hour.
  • Rupture is catastrophic and aortic rupture has an 80% mortality.
  • Up to 20% die before reaching hospital.[2]
  • The diagnosis is not made until postmortem in 15%.
  • Early intervention and control of hypertension dramatically improve the prognosis.[7]
  • Survival has improved greatly over the years.[8] Without surgery the prognosis for patients with involvement of the ascending aorta is poor; 40% die within 24 hours and 80% die within two weeks.
  • Although successful surgery increases the chances of survival to about 80%, operative mortality is in the region of 25%.[9]

Late deaths are due to aortic rupture and so repeat surgery is required for:

  • Secondary aneurysm in dissected aorta remote from initial repair.
  • Recurrent dissection or aneurysm formation at the previous intervention site.
  • Graft replacement for gross dehiscence or infection.
  • Use of homografts to replace infected prostheses.
  • Endovascular stenting if there is surgical indication and anatomy is suitable.

The rate of re-operation is around 10% at five years and 40% at ten years.

Those with predisposing inherited diseases such as Marfan's syndrome and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome should have:

  • Annual aortic diameter screening.
  • Lifelong beta-blockade.
  • Prophylactic replacement of the aortic root before the diameter exceeds 5.0 cm in patients with a family history of dissection.
  • Prophylactic replacement of the aortic root before the diameter exceeds 5.5 cm in other.
  • Moderate restriction of physical activity.

This summarises the 'take home message':

  • Aortic dissection is much rarer than acute myocardial infarction but it is important to have an index of suspicion to avoid inappropriate treatment.
  • Be wary of those with known aortic disease or inherited diseases such as Marfan's disease or Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.
  • Be wary if the pain is worst at the onset rather than crescendo-like.
  • Chest pains that move suggest dissection.
  • Be suspicious in those with poorly controlled hypertension.
  • A diastolic murmur is of great significance.
  • A normal CXR does not exclude the diagnosis.

Further reading & references

  1. Aziz S, Ramsdale DR; Acute dissection of the thoracic aorta. Hosp Med. 2004 Mar;65(3):136-42.
  2. Thrumurthy SG, Karthikesalingam A, Patterson BO, et al; The diagnosis and management of aortic dissection. BMJ. 2011 Jan 11;344:d8290. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d8290.
  3. Aortic Aneurysm, Familial Thoracic 1, AAT1; Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM)
  4. Aortic Aneurysm, Familial Thoracic 2, AAT2; Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM)
  5. Melchior T, Hallam D, Johansen BE; Aortic dissection in the thrombolytic era: early recognition and optimal management is a prerequisite for increased survival. Int J Cardiol. 1993 Nov;42(1):1-6.
  6. Cooper DG, Walsh SR, Sadat U, et al; Treating the thoracic aorta in Marfan syndrome: surgery or TEVAR? J Endovasc Ther. 2009 Feb;16(1):60-70.
  7. Myrmel T, Lai DT, Miller DC; Can the principles of evidence-based medicine be applied to the treatment of aortic dissections? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Feb;25(2):236-42; discussion 242-5.
  8. Westaby S, Bertoni GB; Fifty years of thoracic aortic surgery: lessons learned and future directions. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Feb;83(2):S832-4; discussion S846-50.
  9. Nienaber CA, Eagle KA; Aortic dissection: new frontiers in diagnosis and management: Part II: therapeutic management and follow-up. Circulation. 2003 Aug 12;108(6):772-8.
Original Author: Prof Cathy Jackson Current Version: Peer Reviewer: Prof Cathy Jackson
Last Checked: 21/12/2012 Document ID: 1815  Version: 23 © EMIS

Disclaimer: This article is for information only and should not be used for the diagnosis or treatment of medical conditions. EMIS has used all reasonable care in compiling the information but make no warranty as to its accuracy. Consult a doctor or other health care professional for diagnosis and treatment of medical conditions. For details see our conditions.