Experience | Patient+ | News | Products | Other
This is a PatientPlus article. PatientPlus articles are written for doctors and so the language can be technical. However, some people find that they add depth to the articles found in the other sections of this website which are written for non-medical people.
Numbers Needed To Treat
Post your experienceSee also the separate article Is this new treatment any good?
The Number Needed to Treat (NNT) is the number of patients who need a specific treatment to prevent one additional bad outcome (e.g. myocardial infarction, stroke).1 The NNT specifies the treatment, its duration, and the adverse outcome being prevented. Therefore if a drug has an NNT of 10, it means you have to treat 10 people with the drug to prevent one additional bad outcome.
- The NNT is the inverse of the Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR).2
- The ARR is the Control Event Rate (CER) minus the Experimental Event Rate (EER), or ARR = CER - EER.
- NNTs are always rounded up to the nearest whole number and accompanied by the 95% confidence interval.
- Example: if a drug reduces the risk of a bad outcome from 50% to 40%, the ARR = 0.5 - 0.4 = 0.1. Therefore the NNT = 1/ARR = 10.
- A nomogram can be used to find the NNT by using the proportion of events in the control group and the relative risk reduction.3
- NNTs can be used either for summarising the results of a therapeutic trial or for medical decision-making about an individual patient.2
- The NNT provides a more clinically useful measure of the relative benefit of an active treatment over a control than the use of the relative risk, the relative risk reduction (RRR) or the odds ratio (the ratio of the odds of an event occurring in one group to the odds of it occurring in another group).4
- Numbers needed to treat are sensitive to factors that change the baseline risk such as the outcome considered, patients' characteristics, secular trends in incidence and case fatality, and the clinical setting.5
- Although NNTs are easy to interpret, they cannot be used for performing a meta-analysis. Pooled NNTs derived from meta-analyses can be seriously misleading because the baseline risk often varies appreciably between the trials.5
- Applying the pooled RRRs from meta-analyses or individual trials to the baseline risk relevant to a specific patient group produces a useful NNT.5 Multiplying the RRR by the CER gives the ARR.
Document references
- Centre for Evidence Based Medicine; NNT
- Chatellier G, Zapletal E, Lemaitre D, et al; The number needed to treat: a clinically useful nomogram in its proper context. BMJ. 1996 Feb 17;312(7028):426-9. [abstract]
- Cook RJ, Sackett DL; The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect. BMJ. 1995 Feb 18;310(6977):452-4. [abstract]
- Smeeth L, Haines A, Ebrahim S; Numbers needed to treat derived from meta-analyses--sometimes informative, usually misleading. BMJ. 1999 Jun 5;318(7197):1548-51.
- Bandolier; Number needed to treat (NNT).
Internet and further reading
- Bandolier - Odds Ratio
- Bandolier; Numbers needed to treat
Document ID: 2526
Document Version: 22
Document Reference: bgp2283
Last Updated: 26 Mar 2009
Planned Review: 26 Mar 2011
The authors and editors of this article are employed to create accurate and up to date content reflecting reliable research evidence, guidance and best clinical practice. They are free from any commercial conflicts of interest. Find out more about updating.
Patient UK Hearing Impairment Survey
Patient UK are grateful to the 550 people who took part in this survey.
To see the results click here.
If you'd like to leave your feedback, please go to our interactive forum.
Experience | Patient+ | News | Products | Other
Related pages in Patient UK
Your Experience (^ top of page)
Please add your experience about this condition / medicinePatientPlus articles related to this topic (^ top of page)
Is this new treatment any good?Patient UK Newspaper (^ top of page)
Latest Health News
View current health newsRelated Products (^ top of page)
Medical equipment

Books

Other - Useful resources (^ top of page)
Pictures, diagrams, photos, images, etc.Evidence based medicine
Online textbooks and journals
UK Guidelines
Online Videos
Medline
Other good health sites
Want to search some more? Use the Google Search box below to search our site.
Disclaimer: Patient UK has no control over the content of any external links above. Inclusion does not imply endorsement by Patient UK.
Want to advertise on this site? Find out how >>
Here you can follow a link to view existing patient experiences on this subject, or to add your own
This will offer you the usual PDF options i.e. document navigation, search, zoom and formatted print
Note: this is the best way to print the document
Note: this will open in a new window
Note: this will open in a new window
Here you can follow a link to view existing patient experiences on this subject, or to add your own
This will offer you the usual PDF options i.e. document navigation, search, zoom and formatted print
Note: this is the best way to print the document
Note: this will open in a new window
Note: this will open in a new window




