Gradual Loss of Vision

This PatientPlus article is written for healthcare professionals so the language may be more technical than the condition leaflets. You may find the abbreviations list helpful.

The separate article Blurred Vision covers acute vision loss.

There are a number of reasons why a patient's vision may be gradually declining. This can be very worrying for some patients. In others, the loss is so subtle that it is only picked up on routine screening by the optician. When the patient presents, it is important to take a thorough history, as the patient's perception of visual impairment (I can't read the paper) may be different to yours (the patient can see the words but they appear distorted rather than blurred, making the reading difficult).

Many causes of gradual visual loss can be diagnosed on history and examination alone with only the most basic additional investigations. This record will provide you with an outline of how to assess the patient presenting with gradual loss of vision, and the possible diagnoses and features that may help confirm these. Follow the links to find out more about the diagnoses themselves.

Save time & improve your PDP on Patient.co.uk

  • Notes Add notes to any clinical page and create a reflective diary
  • Track Automatically track and log every page you have viewed
  • Print Print and export a summary to use in your appraisal
Click to find out more »

History

A routine history is mandatory and will often guide you to a possible cause. Specifically ask about:

  • What is the problem?
    • Unilateral versus bilateral.
    • Blurred vision: the whole field? Close, distance or both?
    • Restricted visual field? Often noted following difficulties in driving, knocking into things at the periphery of vision
    • Distorted rather than blurred vision (eg dent in printed words, door/window frames, objects appearing smaller or larger). If so, check with an Amsler grid (see under 'Internet and further reading', below). Distortion of straight lines indicates serious macular pathology and needs urgent referral.[1]
    • Bits of visual field missing altogether: central versus peripheral; what is the remainder of the vision like?
  • Onset:
    • When? Any significant health issues at that time?
    • How was it first noticed? Unilateral visual loss might have gone unnoticed until the patient closed the other eye.
  • Progression: slow and steady decline, step-wise drops in visual acuity, or an intermittent problem? If intermittent, think of transient ischaemic attacks (TIAs) or impending acute angle-closure glaucoma.
  • Are there any associated factors? For example, pain (very important diagnostically, see 'Painful loss', below), redness, visual phenomena, eg haloes, flashes of light, new floaters. These symptoms usually merit an urgent referral.[1]
  • Are there any precipitating factors? Specifically ask about changes over the course of a day - better in the day or at night?

Other important aspects of the history include the past ocular history, medical history, family history, medication and social history:

  • Is this affecting their lifestyle?
  • Are there implications with regard to their work or driving?
  • Will this mark the loss of their independent living?

Examination

Important points to note on examination are:

  • The visual acuity of both eyes. Does this improve using a pinhole?
  • The red reflex: a media opacity (appears black against the red reflex) suggests a corneal, lens or vitreous problem. To localise the site of the opacity with respects to the pupil [lens]:
    • Slowly shift the direction of your ophthalmoscope light.
    • Look at the direction in which the opacity appears to move in relationship to the pupillary (central) axis.
    • If there is no 'movement' of the opacity, it lies within the pupil (lens).
    • If the opacity 'moves' in the same direction, it is anterior to the lens (cornea).
    • If the opacity 'moves' in the opposite direction, it is posterior to the pupil (posterior lens or vitreous).
    If the media is clear, it is more likely to be a retinal or optic nerve disorder.
  • If there is a normal red reflex, take a good look at the fundus.
  • Do a functional testing of visual field, pupils, optic nerve and macula.
  • Use an Amsler grid to look for distortion of straight lines - if present, this indicates serious macular pathology and needs urgent referral. A grid is available from the 'Internet and further reading' link, below.

The separate article Examination of the Eye explains in detail how to do all these tests. Complement your examination with a blood pressure check and a urine glucose test. A neurological examination may be necessary if everything else seems completely normal.

Interpreting the findings - some clinical patterns

Note that the optic nerve fibres divide and cross over at the optic chiasm, which can help you locate the site of the visual defect:[2]

  • Loss of vision in one eye - implies the problem is in the eye itself or in the optic nerve before it reaches the optic chiasm.
  • Loss of vision in both temporal fields (bitemporal hemianopia) - occurs from lesions compressing the optic chiasm, eg pituitary tumour or craniopharyngioma.
  • Loss of left or right visual field (homonymous hemianopia) - implies the lesion is somewhere between the optic chiasm and the occiput.

In the eye itself:

  • Chronic glaucoma tends to cause tunnel vision (loss of peripheral visual field).
  • Macular degeneration causes loss of central vision (central scotoma) and may cause distortion of straight lines.

Painless loss[3][4]

  • Refractive error - this is characterised by an improvement of the visual acuity with the use of a pinhole (if you don't have a specific occluder with pinholes, a biro point-sized hole in a stiff piece of cardboard will do). Refer to the optician.
  • Cataracts - the patient often complains of glare in dark conditions (and so difficulty in driving at night) and may complain that colours appear more dull than they used to. There may be an abnormal red reflex and, in advanced cases, the cataract may be visible to the naked eye (this is increasingly rare these days). Other aspects of the examination should be normal unless there is concurrent pathology. Refer routinely.
  • Age-related macular degeneration (AMD)[4][5] - suspect AMD if the patient is aged >50 years and is presenting with either of the following symptoms, usually affecting one eye at a time:
    • Distortion of vision, where straight lines appear crooked or wavy.
    • Painless loss or blurring of central or near-central vision. The person may describe a black or grey patch affecting their central field of vision (scotoma).
    Various other visual symptoms can occur, or AMD may be an incidental finding by an optometrist. Visual acuity on a Snellen chart may be normal or reduced. When viewing an Amsler chart (or graph paper), patients may see breaks, waviness, or missing portions of the lines. Refer urgently if AMD is suspected (see box 'Urgent referral for suspected age-related macular degeneration (AMD)', below).
  • Chronic (primary) open angle glaucoma - is most commonly picked up through screening. If it is so advanced that the patient is the first to notice it, very little can be done. It is characterised by a progressive peripheral visual field loss and 'cupping' of the optic discs (the central area of the optic disc enlarges and the peripheral rim thins out). The degree of urgency depends on how advanced the damage is.
  • Diabetic retinopathy - the problem may be due to the diabetic microvascular problems (ie exudates and haemorrhages), to associated pathology (eg diabetic cataract) or unrelated pathology (eg glaucoma). Refer promptly (within a week), as prompt treatment may prevent deterioration.
  • Compression of optic nerve or optic pathway - rare, but should be considered if there is a history of headaches and if you find any neurological or endocrinological abnormalities (eg acromegaly) on examination. Look for a relative afferent pupillary defect (not usually present in the above conditions), a pale or swollen optic disc (the margins are not clear) and visual field defects (as explained under 'Assessment', above).
  • Drugs, toxins or nutritional deficiency[6] - e.g:
  • Hereditary Retinal Dystrophies (see separate article) - these are rare and, depending on the exact problem, present anywhere from early childhood to middle age. Some are rapidly progressing; others are very slow. Typical features particularly include poor night vision and intolerance to light. Poor appreciation of movement in the peripheral visual field may also be a feature. Ask about similar problems in family members (who may not have been diagnosed). Children should be referred more promptly than adults for whom a routine referral is fine. These patients will need genetic counselling as well as support where the prognosis is poor.
  • Cerebrovascular disease (stroke and TIA) - although these are likely to present acutely. TIA causing visual loss is termed amaurosis fugax.
  • Papilloedema - eg from intracranial hypertension.

Painful loss

This is much rarer and tends to suggest a more sinister pathology such as:

  • A progressive neoplastic (eg choroidal melanoma) or inflammatory process (eg chorioretinitis).
  • A systemic problem (eg sarcoidosis or collagen vascular disease).
  • Lesions on the optic nerve (eg optic neuritis, granuloma or neuroma).
  • Intracranial pathology or masses (may present with headache, or with endocrine symptoms if a pituitary tumour).
  • Intracranial hypertension (may have headache).

Be guided by the patient's past medical history, a neurological as well as ocular examination and baseline blood tests (these can be carried out at the same time as a referral is made). All these patients should be referred. Referral is more urgent than with painless conditions and patients should really be seen within a few days.

Any patient with an acute deterioration of vision (over hours or days) will need immediate or same-day referral - see separate Blurred Vision article.

For patients with gradual loss of vision, most will need referring to ophthalmology for diagnosis. The urgency of the referral depends on the clinical situation - if in doubt, discuss with an ophthalmologist.

Scenarios that need urgent attention are:

  • Where vision might be preserved by prompt treatment - for example:
    • Suspected age-related macular degeneration (AMD) - particularly if there is distorted vision or rapid change (see box below).
    • Diabetic retinopathy.
  • Where sinister pathology is suspected.
  • Where the loss is bilateral.
  • Where there is pain, a red eye, or there are additional visual symptoms, eg flashes.
  • Where visual deterioration has been relatively rapid, is progressing, or there is a new deterioration.
  • Monocular patients or those who already have poor vision in one eye. Any vision loss in the 'good' eye requires urgent assessment.
Urgent referral for suspected AMD[4] If AMD is suspected, refer urgently - to be seen in ≤1 week:
  • Reason - with the neovascular form of AMD, prompt treatment may preserve vision. GPs cannot be expected to differentiate neovascular AMD from other types.
  • Urgent referral is particularly important if there is:
    • Distortion of vision (check with the Amsler chart).
    • Visual loss that is of rapid onset.
The referral route depends on local pathways - for example:
  • Fast-track macular clinic or medical retina clinic treatment centre (if available).
  • Local district general hospital eye service.
  • Optometrist ('optician') - only if the patient will be seen in ≤1 week AND the optometrist is able to refer promptly onward to an ophthalmologist if necessary. This is not yet universal.
NB: advise the patient that if there is delay of >1 week in seeing the optometrist/ophthalmologist or if symptoms are worsening, they must attend Eye Casualty or other emergency doctor, to expedite specialist assessment.

If there is no suspicion of an urgent problem and the patient has not had a recent sight test, consider referring the patient to an optometrist in the first instance - there may simply be a refractive error.

  • Advise the patient not to drive and that, if their vision does not meet the DVLA criteria for fitness to drive, they should inform the DVLA.
  • Hospital clinics should provide support and follow-up around the time of diagnosis, even if no medical treatment is available for the condition.[4]

The possibility of blindness is a terrifying thing in all people. In the younger person, there are huge issues relating to socialising, studying, and getting a job. In the older person, independent living may be jeopardised. In all patients, there may be existential questions about self-definition, fear of isolation and the possibility of depression. This needs to be acknowledged yet sensitively balanced with the reality of the condition, eg it is fairly unusual for conditions to lead to total blindness and the patient can often learn to use their residual vision. There is a range of practical support (visual aids, mobility training, educational support for children) and there are many support groups that can offer help, whether general (eg the Royal National Institute of Blind People (RNIB) or specific (eg the Macular Disease Society).

You will find more information on management and support of these patients in the separate relevant articles (see links above) and in the separate article Blindness and Partial Sight.

Further reading & references

  1. Fraser S et al; Eye Know How, BMJ Books, 2001
  2. Goldberg S; Clinical neuroanatomy made ridiculously simple, MedMaster, 1993
  3. Elkington AR, Khaw PT; ABC of eyes. Gradual visual loss, partial sight, and "blindness". BMJ. 1988 Aug 20-27;297(6647):548-9.
  4. Macular degeneration - age-related, Clinical Knowledge Summaries (March 2010)
  5. Podbielski DW, Noble J; Ophthaproblem. Wet age-related macular degeneration. Can Fam Physician. 2008 Oct;54(10):1395-8.
  6. Pelletier AL, Thomas J, Shaw FR; Vision loss in older persons. Am Fam Physician. 2009 Jun 1;79(11):963-70.
  7. Royal College of Ophthalmologists; Clinical guidelines (various).
  8. Grzybowski A, Holder GE; Tobacco optic neuropathy (TON) - the historical and present concept of the Acta Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar 16.
  9. Paasma R, Hovda KE, Jacobsen D; Methanol poisoning and long term sequelae - a six years follow-up after a large BMC Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Mar 27;9:5.
  10. Waqar S, Kersey T, Byles D; Night blindness in primary biliary cirrhosis. CMAJ. 2010 Aug 10;182(11):1212. Epub 2010 May 31.
Original Author: Dr Olivia Scott Current Version:
Last Checked: 20/12/2010 Document ID: 2209  Version: 21 © EMIS

Disclaimer: This article is for information only and should not be used for the diagnosis or treatment of medical conditions. EMIS has used all reasonable care in compiling the information but make no warranty as to its accuracy. Consult a doctor or other health care professional for diagnosis and treatment of medical conditions. For details see our conditions.