Experience | Diagrams | Support | Patient+ | Guidelines | Videos | News | Products | Other
This is a PatientPlus article. PatientPlus articles are written for doctors and so the language can be technical, however some people find that they add depth to the patient information leaflets. You may find the abbreviations record helpful.
Delay in Second Stage of Labour and Use of Forceps
Post your experienceSee others (1 there)
The rate of operative vaginal delivery has remained fairly constant at 10-15%.1
Although it is now generally well established that there are significant risks associated with rotational and mid-cavity deliveries,2 there are low morbidity rates with most operative deliveries.3 It should also be remembered that Caesarean section in the second stage of labour is not without considerable morbidity.4,5
The operator should use their skill and judgement to determine the best choice of instrument for the situation.6 The RCOG currently advises that the vacuum extractor should be the first choice.1 Although this can have a higher failure rate and increased risks of cephalohaematoma, it has been shown to be associated with less maternal trauma.7,8,9
The following factors have been shown to be favourable in avoiding assisted delivery:
- Use of a partogram to monitor progress in labour
- Mother labours in an upright or left lateral position9
- Avoidance of use of epidural anaesthesia
NB: There is no evidence that discontinuing an epidural in the second stage of labour will decrease the risk of assisted delivery.10
The following factors can reduce the number of mid-cavity or rotational deliveries:
- Using oxytocin in a nulliparous mother with an epidural
- Delaying active pushing in a nulliparous mother11
|
They are used to shorten the second stage of labour:
Fetal:
- Presumed, or diagnosed (by fetal blood sampling) compromise
- To protect the head during breech vaginal delivery12
- To avoid Valsalva manoeuvre e.g. maternal cardiac disease - Class 3 or 4
- Hypertensive crises
- Cardiovascular disease, particularly uncorrected malformations
- Myasthenia gravis
- Spinal cord injury
- Nulliparous women:
- Lack of progress for 3 hours (active and passive stage combined), with regional anaesthesia
- Lack of progress for 2 hours if no regional anaesthesia
- Multiparous women:
- Lack of progress for 2 hours if regional anaesthesia in place
- Lack of progress for 1 hour if no regional anaesthesia in place
- Maternal fatigue/exhaustion
- Predisposition to fractures in the fetus
- Bleeding tendency or active bleeding in fetus
- Face presentation and vacuum extractor
- Gestation ≤ 34 weeks1
Full discussion and consent should take place with mother/parents.
(Acronym=FORCEPS)
- [F]ully dilated cervix
- [O]ccipito-anterior position preferably - occipito-posterior position (OP) delivery is possible with Keillands forceps and vacuum.
- [R]uptured membranes
- [C]ephalic presentation
- [E]engaged presenting part i.e. the greater diameter of baby's head has passed pelvic brim
- [P]ain relief is adequate
- Vacuum extraction or low forceps - minimum of perineal nerve block
- Mid forceps - epidural or pudendal nerve block, or general anaesthetic
- [S]phincter (bladder) empty
These are associated with:
- Maternal BMI ≥ 30
- Estimated fetal weight ≥ 4kg
- OP position
- Mid-cavity deliveries
These factors should prompt trial of delivery, with preparations to proceed to Caesarean section immediately if unsuccessful.
- The procedure should be abandoned if no descent is seen with 3 pulls.
- An incident report should be completed.
- Using differing instruments sequentially is not recommended.13
Analgesia
Routine paracetamol and diclofenac should be prescribed, if there are no contra-indications.1
Antibiotics
There is no evidence that these should be routinely prescribed.14
Thromboprophylaxis
Each woman should be individually assessed for risk e.g. immobility.
Bladder care
The woman should have fluid volume chart for the first 24 hours, to asses for retention and function. Referral to physiotherapy may be appropriate.
- Vacuum-assisted delivery has a lower rate of successful delivery, but is less likely to lead to Caesarean section than the use of forceps.
- Vacuum-assisted delivery is also associated with less use of anaesthesia and fewer severe maternal injuries.
- However, use of forceps following failed vacuum extraction can lead to high level of damage to mother. Adverse symptoms such as urinary and faecal incontinence are common in mothers with both forms of assisted delivery.8,9
- Cephalhaematomas and retinal haemorrhages are well recognised sequelae of vacuum extraction, but usually have no long term adverse effects.7,15
Suitable subjects may include:
- Rate of use
- Rate of failures
- Incidence of maternal tears
- Neonatal trauma
- Standard of documentation
Document references
- Operative Vaginal Delivery, Royal College of Gynaecologists (2005)
- Chiswick ML, James D; Kielland's forceps. Br Med J. 1979 Mar 17;1(6165):747-8.
- Gei AF, Belfort MA; Forceps-assisted vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1999 Jun;26(2):345-70. [abstract]
- Murphy DJ, Liebling RE, Verity L, et al; Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour: a cohort study. Lancet. 2001 Oct 13;358(9289):1203-7. [abstract]
- Villar J, Carroli G, Zavaleta N, et al; Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study. BMJ. 2007 Nov 17;335(7628):1025. Epub 2007 Oct 30. [abstract]
- Intrapartum care, NICE Clinical Guideline (2007)
- Johanson RB, Menon V. Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1998, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD000224. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000224
- Johanson RB, Heycock E, Carter J, et al; Maternal and child health after assisted vaginal delivery: five-year follow up of a randomised controlled study comparing forceps and ventouse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Jun;106(6):544-9. [abstract]
- Fitzpatrick M, Behan M, O'Connell PR, et al; Randomised clinical trial to assess anal sphincter function following forceps or vacuum assisted vaginal delivery. BJOG. 2003 Apr;110(4):424-9. [abstract]
- Torvaldsen S, Roberts CL, Bell JC, Raynes-Greenow CH. Discontinuation of epidural analgesia late in labour for reducing the adverse delivery outcomes associated with epidural analgesia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD004457. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004457.pub2
- Roberts CL, Torvaldsen S, Cameron CA, et al; Delayed versus early pushing in women with epidural analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2004 Dec;111(12):1333-40.
- The management of breech presentation, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2006)
- Towner D, Castro MA, Eby-Wilkens E, et al; Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury. N Engl J Med. 1999 Dec 2;341(23):1709-14. [abstract]
- Liabsuetrakul T, Choobun T, Peeyananjarassri K, Islam M; Antibiotic prophylaxis for operative vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD004455. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004455.pub2.
- Simonson C, Barlow P, Dehennin N, et al; Neonatal complications of vacuum-assisted delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Mar;109(3):626-33. [abstract]
DocID: 964
Document Version: 21
DocRef: bgp247
Last Updated: 30 Jul 2008
Review Date: 30 Jul 2010
The authors and editors of this article are employed to create accurate and up to date content reflecting reliable research evidence, guidance and best clinical practice. They are free from any commercial conflicts of interest. Find out more about updating.
Experience | Diagrams | Support | Patient+ | Guidelines | Videos | News | Products | Other
Related pages in Patient UK
Your Experience (^ top of page)
Please add your experience about this condition / medicine
View Patient Experience for 'Forceps Deliveries' (1 there)Diagrams related to this topic (^ top of page)
Support Groups related to this topic (^ top of page)
PatientPlus articles related to this topic (^ top of page)
UK guidelines related to this topic (^ top of page)
Videos related to this topic (^ top of page)
Patient UK Newspaper (^ top of page)
Recent related news items
All news by related topic
Related Products (^ top of page)
Medical equipment
Books
Other - Useful resources (^ top of page)
Pictures, diagrams, photos, images, etc.Evidence based medicine
Online textbooks and journals
UK Guidelines
Online Videos
Medline
Other good health sites
Want to search some more? Use the Google Search box below to search our site.
| Recommended Book | |
| What to Expect the First Year Available in the Patient UK Bookshop | |
Disclaimer: Patient UK has no control over the content of any external links above. Inclusion does not imply endorsement by Patient UK.
Want to advertise on this site? Find out how >>
Here you can follow a link to view existing patient experiences on this subject, or to add your own
This will offer you the usual PDF options i.e. document navigation, search, zoom and formatted print
Note: this is the best way to print the document
Note: this will open in a new window
Note: this will open in a new window
Here you can follow a link to view existing patient experiences on this subject, or to add your own
This will offer you the usual PDF options i.e. document navigation, search, zoom and formatted print
Note: this is the best way to print the document
Note: this will open in a new window
Note: this will open in a new window


