Constipation in Childhood

This PatientPlus article is written for healthcare professionals so the language may be more technical than the condition leaflets. You may find the abbreviations list helpful.

Introduction

Constipation in children is a common problem affecting between 5% and 30% of children.1 It is often accompanied by parental anxiety. It is typically characterised by infrequent bowel evacuations, large stools and difficult or painful evacuation. About a third of patients develop chronic symptoms and referral to secondary care is common.1 It accounts for some 25% of paediatric gastroenterologists' work and is also one of the 10 most common problems seen by general paediatricians. On a practical note, when faced with the casual request of a laxative for a child, think carefully. It is recommended that the child be seen for a proper assessment and diagnosis.

Definitions of constipation

Attempts have been made to define terms more precisely. There is something of a lack of consensus on the meaning of words used for common defecation problems. It is important to distinguish the normal from the abnormal. Frequency of bowel action reduces on average from 4 x per day in early childhood to about 1 x per day by age 4, by which age most children (98%) are toilet trained.2 Some terms regarded as imprecise, such as soiling and encopresis, have been replaced by the term incontinence.The following terms were recommended by the Paris Consensus on Childhood Constipation Terminology (PACCT) Group in 2005 and they inform the diagnostic criteria.3 In practice there are still children who have symptoms not adequately described by these terms.4

  • Chronic constipation - 2 or more of the following in the preceding 8 weeks:
    • Fewer than 3 bowel movements per week.
    • More than one episode of faecal incontinence per week.
    • Either palpable stools in the abdomen, or large stools palpable rectally.
    • Passing stools so large they block the toilet.
    • Retentive posturing and withholding behaviours.
    • Painful defecation.
  • Faecal incontinence - passage of stool in inappropriate places:
    • Organic faecal incontinence - faecal incontinence resulting from organic disease.
    • Functional faecal incontinence - faecal incontinence without organic disease:
      • Constipation-associated faecal incontinence.
      • Non-retentive faecal incontinence - (no constipation associated). This is the passage of stools in inappropriate places in children over 4 years old with no evidence of constipation.
  • Faecal impaction - large faecal mass (abdominal or rectal and assessed by abdominal, rectal or other methods of examination) unlikely to be passed on demand.
  • Pelvic floor dyssynergia - the inability to relax the pelvic floor when attempting to defecate.

Epidemiology

  • Constipation in children, from whatever cause, is very common worldwide and 90-95% of constipation is functional: 5
    • Prevalence ranged from 0.7% to 29.6%.
    • Prevalence rates were similar in boys and girls.
    • Age of highest prevalence could not be identified.
    • Socioeconomic factors were not found to be associated.
    • Further studies using newer diagnostic criteria were called for.
  • Most children with constipation are developmentally normal. It is seen commonly in:
    • Infants at weaning.
    • Toddlers acquiring toilet skills.
    • School age.
  • Often psychosocial factors may be involved or suspected. They may precede or maintain the constipation.6

Presentation

  • History. In addition to general history (past medical history, school and social history and family history) the parent and child should be specifically questioned about the constipation. Parents can mistake incontinence for diarrhoea. In infants under 6 months, straining and crying for 10 minutes before passage of stools is caused by dyschezia (painful or difficult defecation which resolves spontaneously) and may be mistaken for constipation. Specific questions should cover:
    • The frequency of defecation.
    • Consistency of stools - this may include use of the Bristol Stool Chart.7
    • Episodes of faecal incontinence.
    • Pain on defecation.
    • Whether stools block the toilet.
    • Any associated behaviour.
    Any pain on defecation is likely to lead to withholding. Toddlers and older children get better at withholding.
  • Examination. This should include:
    • Palpation of the abdomen for faecal mass.
    • Inspection for anal stenosis or ectopia.
    • Looking for sacral abnormalities.
    Note:
    • Rectal examination is not routinely necessary or required.
    • Routine radiography is not recommended.

Aetiology

Organic causes of constipation

It is important to distinguish these organic causes from the much more common functional causes. Many of the organic causes will present in the first few weeks of life.8

  • Anorectal malformations:
    • Physical examination. Careful inspection of the perineum in any baby with constipation:
      • Is the anus in correct position relative to the vulva or scrotum?
      • Careful digital rectal examination with the well-lubricated fifth finger is advocated by some (detect stricture, assess volume and hardness of rectal stool).4 However, this should only be undertaken by healthcare professionals competent to interpret features of anatomical abnormalities or Hirschsprung's disease.1
  • Anal fissure. This is common and associated with painful defecation. Passage of blood and sentinel pile on the anterior anus are characteristic.4
  • Rectal prolapse. This may be caused, for example, by chronic straining and constipation, disorders of sacral nerve innervation and chronic diarrhoea.4
  • Hirschsprung's disease. This usually presents early (as delay in passing meconium, failure to thrive, etc.) well inside the first month. However, rarely it can present late.
    Diagnosis is by:
    • Rectal biopsy - the test of choice.
    • Anorectal manometry, which is NOT recommended.1
    • Barium enema.
  • Neurenteric problems:
    • Colonic motility - the test of choice.
    • Colonic transit.
    • Possibly rectal biopsy.
  • Spinal cord problems:
  • Pelvic floor dyssynergia:
    • Anorectal manometry - the test of choice.
  • Metabolic or systemic disorders:
  • Toxic:
    • Lead levels, toxicology screen.
  • Cows' milk allergy:
    • Elimination diet.
    • Allergy testing.

Functional causes of constipation

Chronic constipation and other types of functional constipation:

  • History and physical examination are most important in the assessment and further tests are rarely necessary.
  • Further investigations are recommended occasionally in chronic constipation and always in non-retentive faecal incontinence.
    Specifically:
    • Radiology (kidneys, ureter, bladder).
    • Colonic transit.

Diagnosis

Confirm constipation is present:9
In a child <1 year, at least two of the following:

  • Less than three complete stools per week (unless exclusively breast-fed when infrequent stools can be normal).
  • Large hard stool or 'rabbit droppings'.
  • Symptoms associated with defecation: distress on passing stool, bleeding with hard stool or straining.
  • Past history of constipation.
  • Previous or current anal fissure.

An older child may have the above, plus:

  • Overflow soiling (the child may be unaware of passing loose, smelly stools, which may be thick and sticky, or dry and flaky).
  • Large stools, big enough to block the toilet!
  • Poor appetite that improves with passage of a large stool.
  • Abdominal pain which waxes and wanes with passage of stool.
  • Retentive posturing, e.g. on tiptoes, straight-legged, and with an arched back.
  • Straining, painful bowel movements, and/or anal pain.

Management (including any investigations)

History and examination are most important to make a diagnosis and should determine whether further investigations are required.

A useful flow chart to guide overall management is incorporated in the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance, emphasising the importance of identifying any amber or red-flag symptoms or signs:1

A summary of NICE guidance on constipation in children and young people1
ConstipationRed flagsAmber flags
Identify:
  • Diagnostic features of constipation.
  • Exclude underlying causes.
  • Exclude red and amber flags.

Features of idiopathic constipation:9

  • History of meconium being passed within 48 hours of birth (in a full-term baby).
  • Constipation begins at least a few weeks after birth.
  • Precipitating factors may be present, such as weaning, poor fluid intake:
  • Abdomen is soft and not distended, normal appearance of anus - note: rectal examination is not routinely required.
  • General health, growth and development are normal with normal gait, tone, and power in lower limbs.
Identify:
  • Symptoms that commence from birth or in first few weeks.
  • Failure or delay (>first 48 hours at term) in passing meconium.
  • Ribbon stools.
  • Leg weakness or locomotor delay.
  • Abdominal distension with vomiting.
  • Abnormal examination findings including:
    • Abnormal appearence of anus.
    • Gross abdominal distension.
    • Abnormal gluteal muscles, scoliosis, sacral agenesis, etc.
    • Limb deformity including talipes.
    • Abnormal reflexes.
Identify:
  • Constipation with faltering growth.
  • Possible maltreatment.
Management:
  • Inform the child, parent and carers of diagnosis.
  • Reassure and advise that treatment can take months.
  • Assess for faecal impaction.
  • Follow management protocol to disimpact (if appropriate) and then maintenance therapy.
  • Give diet and lifestyle advice (fibre, fluids, exercise).
  • Liaise with the school nurse.
  • Refer if there is no response within 3 months.
Management:
  • Do not treat constipation.
  • Refer urgently to appropriate specialist for specific diagnosis and treatment.
Management:
  • If there is evidence of faltering growth, treat for constipation and test for coeliac disease and hypothyroidism.
  • If there is evidence of possible child maltreatment, treat for
    constipation and refer to guidelines on suspected child abuse.
For full guidance, refer to NICE.1

Management of functional or idiopathic constipation

This section is aimed at the management of functional or idiopathic constipation.1,9 The aims are to remove faecal impaction, restore bowel habit (with soft stools passed without pain), self-toileting and passing of stools in appropriate places.

Management plan

    The following are important:
  • Establishing rapport. This should take account of:
    • Anxiety of the parent and child.
    • Attitudes of guilt or blame.
    • Inappropriately coercive toilet training.
    • Social consequences (for example, faecal incontinence in older children).
    The clinician should take a positive approach which is sympathetic, non-accusatory and with careful explanations and continued involvement and follow-up.
  • Disimpaction. Retained faeces should be cleared from the rectum:
    • Initially, use an osmotic laxative, e.g polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3350 plus electrolytes (Movicol® Paediatric Plain). This may increase symptoms (e.g. soiling) at first. Gradually increase the dose if ineffective.

      If not tolerated, substitute a stimulant laxative (see below) either on its own or with lactulose (osmotic laxative) or faecal softener (docusate) if stools are hard.9
    • If ineffective after 2 weeks add a stimulant laxative e.g. sodium picosulfate or senna in children over one month of age, docusate (softener and weak stimulant laxative) from 6 months of age or bisacodyl suppositories from 2 years of age.9 If success is not forthcoming, discuss with a paediatrician.
    • Rectal treatments should be avoided in children (suppositories, enemas, manual evacuation), although they may be recommended by specialists, and in hospital.
    • Review the child at least weekly until successful.9
  • Maintenance therapy. This may incorporate:
    • Dietary advice, including intake of fluids and fibre.
    • Use of bowel charts and diary for objective record.
    • Regular laxatives over months or even years, preferably osmotic (PEG 3350 or lactulose), titrated to maintain soft formed stool.
    • Avoiding stopping and starting treatment causing intermittent impaction.
    • Avoiding prolonged use of stimulant laxatives (causes atonic colon and hypokalaemia).
    • Using stimulant laxatives intermittently only to avoid impaction.
  • Modification of behaviour. Behavioural principles are useful in management. Specific behavioural modification techniques can be employed in specialist clinics.
    In general:
    • Encourage regular, unhurried toileting.
    • Encourage use of reward systems for successful use of the toilet.
    • Encourage linkage of diary to reward system.
  • Incontinence. Dealing with this requires:
    • Explanation to the parent and child of the involuntary nature of this.
    • Encouragement of regular toileting.
    • Involvement of the school nurse if possible to help with toileting and teacher education.
    There is no good evidence for psychological interventions despite some associations between incontinence and psychological problems.10

Note that:

  • Infrequent defecation increases the likelihood of pain on passage of hard stools, anal fissures, anal spasm and ultimately a learned response to withhold defecation.
  • Chronic obstruction may cause the rectum to enlarge to form a megarectum, which has impaired sensation and decreased contractility, resulting in soiling.
  • Regular bowel actions must then be established using dietary advice (fibre and fluid intake), regular laxatives and encouragement of a toileting pattern.
  • Laxatives must be continued for many months and then gradually withdrawn. Relapses are common and should be treated early with increased doses of laxatives.
  • Children and parents should be offered psychological counselling and support through the treatment process. Older children may also benefit from biofeedback training.11 However NICE advises against routinely referring children with idiopathic constipation to a psychologist or any other mental health services unless they have been identified as being likely to benefit specifically from a psychological intervention.1
  • Very rarely, children may require enemas under sedation and even surgery to modify the anal sphincter.12

Indications for referral

Specialist assessment is indicated if:

  • An organic cause is suspected or there are any red flags (see above).
  • Treatment is unsuccessful (i.e. no response in 4 weeks for a child under 1 year), refer (to exclude Hirschsprung's disease), or no improvement after 3 months in an older child.9
  • Management is complex.
  • Child abuse is suspected.

When an organic cause is suspected, the GP can arrange for initial tests (such as inflammatory markers, thyroid function, calcium, tests for coeliac disease). Some specialists measure colonic transit time to differentiate:

  • Soiling with normal transit time.
  • Constipation and delayed transit time (worse outcomes).

Surgery is required rarely for the most severe cases of chronic constipation and overflow soiling. It can be important in intractable cases.4 Botulinum toxin has been used for short aganglionic segments of bowel and to provide temporary weakening of the sphincter.4

Complications

Failure to correct functional constipation may lead to problems. For example, the following may arise:

  • Faecal impaction.
  • Chronic constipation.
  • Megacolon (may predispose to, or result from, constipation).
  • Rectal prolapse.
  • Anal fissure.
  • Faecal soiling.
  • Psychological effects.

Prognosis

Long-term follow-up studies of children under the age of 5 referred to a specialist clinic showed 50% recovery within 1 year and 65-70% recovery within 2 years, with the remaining 30% or so requiring long-term laxatives, or continuing to soil.6 In another study, 30% of children continued to have severe constipation beyond puberty.13 Obviously, results from earlier treatment of less severe cases in general practice should be better than this.


Document references

  1. Constipation in children and young people, NICE Clinical Guideline (May 2010); Diagnosis and management of idiopathic childhood constipation in primary and secondary care
  2. Fontana M, Bianchi C, Cataldo F, et al; Bowel frequency in healthy children. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1989 Sep;78(5):682-4. [abstract]
  3. Benninga M, Candy DC, Catto-Smith AG, et al; The Paris Consensus on Childhood Constipation Terminology (PACCT) Group. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005 Mar;40(3):273-5.
  4. G S Clayden, A S Keshtgar, I Carcani-Rathwell, A Abhyankar; Archives of Disease in Childhood Education and Practice Edition; The Management of Chronic Constipation and Related Faecal Incontinence in Childhood
  5. van den Berg MM, Benninga MA, Di Lorenzo C; Epidemiology of childhood constipation: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Oct;101(10):2401-9. [abstract]
  6. Baker SS, Liptak GS, Colletti RB, et al; Constipation in infants and children: evaluation and treatment. A medical position statement of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1999 Nov;29(5):612-26. [abstract]
  7. Bristol Stool Chart
  8. Nurko S; What's the value of diagnostic tools in defecation disorders? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005 Sep;41 Suppl 1:S53-5.
  9. Constipation in children, Clinical Knowledgs Summaries (September 2010)
  10. Rubin G, Dale A; Chronic constipation in children. BMJ. 2006 Nov 18;333(7577):1051-5.
  11. No authors listed; Managing constipation in children. Drug Ther Bull. 2000 Aug;38(8):57-60. [abstract]
  12. Clayden GS, Keshtgar AS, Carcani-Rathwell I, Abhyankar A. The management of chronic constipation and related faecal incontinence in childhood - Best Practice. Archives of Disease in Childhood - Education and Practice 2005; 90: ep58-ep67 (subscription required)
  13. van Ginkel R, Reitsma JB, Buller HA, et al; Childhood constipation: longitudinal follow-up beyond puberty. Gastroenterology. 2003 Aug;125(2):357-63. [abstract]

Internet and further reading

Acknowledgements

EMIS is grateful to Dr Huw Thomas for writing this article and to Dr Richard Draper for earlier versions. The final copy has passed scrutiny by the independent Mentor GP reviewing team. ©EMIS 2011.
Document ID: 3091
Document Version: 4
Document Reference: bgp25944
Last Updated: 7 Mar 2011
Provide feedback