Experience | Leaflets | Patient+ | Guidelines | Weblinks | Videos | News | Products | Other
This is a PatientPlus article. PatientPlus articles are written for doctors and so the language can be technical, however some people find that they add depth to the patient information leaflets. You may find the abbreviations record helpful.
Chlamydial Genital Infection
Post your experienceChlamydiae are small, obligate-intracellular Gram-negative bacteria that infect human columnar and transitional epithelium. Chlamydia trachomatis is responsible for:
- Ocular infection (trachoma)
- Genitourinary infections
- Lymphogranuloma venereum (a rare, sexually transmitted tropical infection causing genital ulcers and inguinal lymphadenopathy)
Different serological variants of C. trachomatis cause the different patterns of disease with types D–K responsible for genitourinary infection.
It is the commonest treatable sexually transmitted infection in the UK1 and the commonest preventable cause of infertility worldwide.2 It is asymptomatic in ~50% of men and ~80% of women.3 The cost of investigating and treating chlamydia and its complications in the UK is estimated at over £100 million per annum.
Prevalence
Prevalence is dependent on the age and setting of the population in question:
- Overall population prevalence as estimated by postal testing survey is 2.8% in men and 3.6% in women.4
- In UK GP surgeries:5
- <20 yrs: 8.1%
- 20–24 yrs: 5.2%
- 25–29 yrs: 2.6%
- >30 yrs: 1.4%
- In genitourinary medicine clinics prevalence is as high as 17% in under-20-year-olds.
- The under-20s have a prevalence of around 12% in antenatal and termination of pregnancy clinics.4
Risk factors3,6
Include:
- Age <25 (highest prevalence in the 16-19 year old range)
- New sexual partner in the last year (note, this is more important than the number of sexual partners)
- Non-barrier contraception
- Infection with another STI
- Poor socioeconomic status
The most consistent risk factor for chlamydial genital infection is young age. Why are young women more susceptible to infection? Possible reasons include:7
- Physical development factors
- Partial immunity has developed in older women
- Different sexual behaviour
- Less reliable condom use
- More difficulty with sexual communication
- Less appreciation of risk
Symptoms
In most cases the infection is asymptomatic and is often only detected during screening or investigation of other genitourinary illness.
Female
If women are symptomatic they may describe:
- Vaginal discharge
- Dysuria (always consider chlamydia as a cause of sterile pyuria)
- Vague lower abdominal pain
- Fever
- Intermenstrual or postcoital bleeding
- Dyspareunia
Male
Men tend to suffer either classical urethritis with dysuria and urethral discharge or epididymo-orchitis presenting as unilateral testicular pain ± swelling. Fever may also be a presenting feature in men.
In both sexes, consider chlamydial infection when:
- Young adults present with a reactive arthritis. Reiter's syndrome is a triad of urethritis, arthritis and conjunctivitis that can be triggered by chlamydial infection (amongst other pathogens), usually in conjunction with HLA B27.
- Upper abdominal pain due to perihepatitis (the Fitz-Hugh-Curtis syndrome) is a presenting feature.
- Proctitis with mucopurulent discharge which may be due to rectal chlamydia following anal intercourse.
- Pharyngeal infection (although this is uncommon and usually asymptomatic with chlamydia)
Signs
Female
In women, signs can include:
- A friable, inflamed cervix, sometimes with a follicular or 'cobblestone' appearance, with contact bleeding
- Mucopurulent endocervical discharge
- Abdominal tenderness
- Pelvic adnexal tenderness on bimanual palpation
- Cervical excitation
Sometimes, chlamydial infection in women is suggested by inflammatory changes in their cervical cytology report and this may require follow-up.
Male
Men may have:
- Epididymal tenderness
- Mucoid or mucopurulent discharge
- Perineal fullness due to prostatitis
- Gonorrhoea (although co-infection is relatively common8)
- Other causes of prostatitis/pelvic inflammatory disease/epididymo-orchitis
- Urethral/vaginal foreign body
- Periurethral abscess
- Ureaplasma urealyticum infection
- Mycoplasma genitalium/hominis infection
- Trichomonas vaginalis infection
- Endometriosis
- Reiter's syndrome
- Urinary tract infection
- Bacterial vaginosis
There are now a number of different techniques for detecting chlamydial infection:
- Cell culture
- Antigen detection or enzyme immunoassays (EIAs)
- Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs)
NAATs have largely superseded other methods due to higher sensitivity (in general, NAATs have a sensitivity of 90-95%, increased by increasing the number of patient sites sampled or the number of different NAATs used to test a sample) and the fact that testing can also be done on urine samples, reducing the need for invasive tests. Where NAATs are not available, it may be prudent to discuss with the patient the lower sensitivity of EIA tests (usually between 40-70%) and the risk of a false negative result.
- Follow local protocols for taking, storing and transporting swabs.
- In women undergoing a vaginal examination, an endocervical swab is preferred. Clean the cervix and rotate the swab 360 degrees inside the os.
- In those who are not undergoing vaginal examination, a first-void urine sample (having held urine for at least 1-2 hours previously) or self-administered vaginal swab may be used. Men should provide urine samples as this test has the same sensitivity as a urethral swab, which is painful and invasive.
Who should we be testing?
Within general practice, our exact mandate will depend on local PCT policy as regards chlamydia screening but will include:3
- Those who are symptomatic
- Infants with ophthalmia neonatorum or neonatal pneumonitis and their parents
- Opportunistic screening
What are good opportunities for chlamydia screening in general practice? They may include:9
|
Simply relying on opportunistic testing within general practice will fail to reach a substantial minority of the at-risk population due to low consultation rates in the teenager/young adult age range and thus is only one component of the overall screening strategy.11
| Do not think about chlamydia in isolation to other STIs : always offer a full STI screen, to include HIV, Hep B and syphilis where appropriate.12 |
Following a positive result
In some instances, primary care doctors may choose to refer to GUM (for counselling or contact tracing by appropriately trained individuals or for fuller STI screening). In other situations, these may be available as a locally enhanced service within the community. There is evidence that trained practice nurses doing partner notification and telephone follow-ups are as effective as trained health advisers in a GUM clinic and have a comparable cost.13
Drug treatment12
Current recommended regimens are:
- Doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 7 days
- Single dose of 1 g of azithromycin (improves compliance)
If these are contraindicated, alternative regimens include:
- Ofloxacin 200 mg twice daily or 400 mg once daily for 7 days
- Erythromycin 500 mg twice daily for 10-14 days
In pregnant and breastfeeding women:
- Erythromycin 500 mg four times daily for 7 days or twice daily for 14 days
- Amoxicillin 500 mg three times daily for 7 days
- Azithromycin 1 g stat (but the BNF cautions that this should only be used if there are no alternatives)
Longer courses of antibiotics are needed for cases of salpingitis or upper genital tract infection in men.
A test of cure is not routine unless the patient is pregnant, has been noncompliant or been re-exposed. Wait for 5 weeks post end of treatment (or 6 weeks with azithromycin).
General advice
Provide clear explanation of the condition and its long term implications for the patient and their partner(s). Key points include:
- Chlamydia is primarily sexually transmitted.
- Infection is very often asymptomatic and may have persisted for many months or even years.
- No diagnostic test is 100% sensitive.
- Potential complications of not treating chlamydia.
- The importance of investigating and treating sexual partners. Agree on method of partner notification.
- The importance of complying with treatment.
- Antibiotic side-effects and interactions with hormonal contraception.
- The need to abstain from sexual intercourse (including oral sex) even with a condom for a week after single-dose therapy or until finishing a longer regimen.
- Do not resume sex with your partner(s) until they too have completed treatment (or for a week following stat dose of azithromycin) or received negative test results, otherwise there is a high risk of reinfection.
- It is important to test for other sexually transmitted infections including Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and Hepatitis B.
- Advice on safer sexual practices and condom use.
Reinforce with clear written information.
Sexual partners
In the UK, the 'look-back' period for partner tracing is somewhat arbitrary but is taken as:
- 4 weeks where an individual is symptomatic
- 6 months or to the last previous sexual partner (whichever is longest) in asymptomatic individuals
Those identified should be informed of their risk, offered treatment, contact tracing and STI testing. Where partners decline 'epidemiological treatment', they should be advised to abstain from sex until they have a negative test result.
Follow-up
Follow-up should be routine:
- To follow up partner notification
- To reinforce health education messages
- To check compliance
- To retreat where necessary
Evidence suggests that telephone follow-up is at least as good as face-to-face and more cost effective.
- Untreated chlamydia will either persist or spontaneously resolve. Factors determining which course an infection takes are not fully understood, nor the period of time over which asymptomatic infection can persist.
- About two-thirds of the sexual partners of an individual with chlamydia will also test positive for chlamydia.6
- Antibiotic treatment is effective in at least 95% of cases if the full course is taken. Outlook is generally good if treated early with full compliance. Long term infection is associated with a higher rate of complications, particularly infertility in women.
- Consider recurrence and repeat testing in those who remain symptomatic. A Dutch study looking at home-based screening in 15-29 year olds found that 10.4% of those who initially screened positive for chlamydia, remained positive a year later. Looking at subtypes, approximately half were new infections and half persisting infections (or re-infections with the same organism).14
- Infertility - female and possibly male15
- Urethral stricture and scarring in men
- Pelvic inflammatory disease
- Increased risk of cervical carcinoma
- Perihepatitis as part of Fitz-Hugh-Curtis syndrome
- Neonatal ophthalmic infection/pneumonia
- Reiter's syndrome
In 2001, the Government's Sexual Health Strategy recommended chlamydial screening based on evidence that a targeted screening programme could reduce chlamydia-related morbidity and complications.
There have been several large scale studies over the first part of this decade looking at the best way to implement national screening - whether to reach the target group (<25 years) opportunistically or via a register-based population strategy? The CLASS (ChLAmydia Screening Study) invited men and women in the 16 to 39 year age bracket to provide a urine specimen or self-taken vaginal swab and return by post for NAAT. It showed that whilst postal screening is feasible, uptake was much lower than might be anticipated (35%) and worse in deprived areas and ethnic minorities, raising the spectre of increasing health inequalities.4 Cost-effectiveness of both opportunistic17 and proactive register-based screening18 approaches has been questioned.
The current strategy is to increase awareness and to offer annual,opportunistic screening to the sexually active, under 25s and to make testing/treatment easily available via a wide variety of traditional healthcare settings (GPs, Family Planning clinics, Gynaecology out patients, GUM clinics, abortion services) and less conventional healthcare settings (community pharmacies, prison health services, young peoples' services) but also outside of healthcare settings (e.g. further and higher education, youth clubs, outreach units and postal kits for use at home).
Document references
- Griffiths C, Cuddigan A; Clinical management of chlamydia in general practice: a survey of reported practice. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2002 Jul;28(3):149-52. [abstract]
- Paavonen J, Eggert-Kruse W; Chlamydia trachomatis: impact on human reproduction. Hum Reprod Update. 1999 Sep-Oct;5(5):433-47. [abstract]
- BASHH Sexually Transmitted Infections in Primary Care 2006.
- Macleod J, Salisbury C, Low N, et al; Coverage and uptake of systematic postal screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis and prevalence of infection in the United Kingdom general population: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2005 Apr 23;330(7497):940. Epub 2005 Apr 4. [abstract]
- Adams EJ, Charlett A, Edmunds WJ, et al; Chlamydia trachomatis in the United Kingdom: a systematic review and analysis of prevalence studies. Sex Transm Infect. 2004 Oct;80(5):354-62. [abstract]
- Management of Chlamydia trachomatis genital tract infection, British Association for Sexual Health & HIV (2006)
- Navarro C, Jolly A, Nair R, et al; Risk factors for genital chlamydial infection. Can J Infect Dis. 2002 May;13(3):195-207. [abstract]
- Das S, Sabin C, Wade A, et al; Sociodemography of genital co-infection with Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in Coventry, UK. Int J STD AIDS. 2005 Apr;16(4):318-22. [abstract]
- Oakeshott P, Hay P, Pakianathan M; Chlamydia screening in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Jul;54(504):491-3.
- Harris DI; Implementation of chlamydia screening in a general practice setting: a 6-month pilot study. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2005 Apr;31(2):109-12. [abstract]
- Salisbury C, Macleod J, Egger M, et al; Opportunistic and systematic screening for chlamydia: a study of consultations by young adults in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Feb;56(523):99-103. [abstract]
- Chlamydia, Clinical Knowledge Summaries (2006).
- Low N, McCarthy A, Roberts TE, et al; Partner notification of chlamydia infection in primary care: randomised controlled trial and analysis of resource use. BMJ. 2006 Jan 7;332(7532):14-9. Epub 2005 Dec 15. [abstract]
- Veldhuijzen IK, Van Bergen JE, Gotz HM, et al; Reinfections, persistent infections, and new infections after general population screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the Netherlands. Sex Transm Dis. 2005 Oct;32(10):599-604. [abstract]
- Gallegos G, Ramos B, Santiso R, et al; Sperm DNA fragmentation in infertile men with genitourinary infection by Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma. Fertil Steril. 2007 Oct 20;. [abstract]
- DOH National Chlamydia Screening Project.
- Adams EJ, Turner KM, Edmunds WJ; The cost effectiveness of opportunistic chlamydia screening in England. Sex Transm Infect. 2007 Jul;83(4):267-74; discussion 274-5. [abstract]
- Roberts TE, Robinson S, Barton PM, et al; Cost effectiveness of home based population screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in the UK: economic evaluation of chlamydia screening studies (ClaSS) project. BMJ. 2007 Aug 11;335(7614):291. Epub 2007 Jul 26. [abstract]
Internet and further reading
- Houry DE; Chlamydia. eMedicine, last updated Feb 2008.
- Lutwig LW; Chlamydial genitourinary infections. eMedicine, Nov 2007.
- HPA - Guidelines for the management of genital chlamydia infections. Health Protection Agency (Various dates)
- www.chlamydiae.com; web resource for both patients and professionals
DocID: 1945
Document Version: 22
DocRef: bgp25045
Last Updated: 19 Mar 2008
Review Date: 19 Mar 2010
The authors and editors of this article are employed to create accurate and up to date content reflecting reliable research evidence, guidance and best clinical practice. They are free from any commercial conflicts of interest. Find out more about updating.
Experience | Leaflets | Patient+ | Guidelines | Weblinks | Videos | News | Products | Other
Related pages in Patient UK
Your Experience (^ top of page)
Please add your experience about this condition / medicineHealth Topic information leaflets related to this topic (^ top of page)
PatientPlus articles related to this topic (^ top of page)
UK guidelines related to this topic (^ top of page)
Links to other selected websites related to this topic (^ top of page)
Videos related to this topic (^ top of page)
Patient UK Newspaper (^ top of page)
Latest Health News
Related Products (^ top of page)
Medical equipment
Books
Other - Useful resources (^ top of page)
Pictures, diagrams, photos, images, etc.Evidence based medicine
Online textbooks and journals
UK Guidelines
Online Videos
Medline
Other good health sites
Want to search some more? Use the Google Search box below to search our site.
Disclaimer: Patient UK has no control over the content of any external links above. Inclusion does not imply endorsement by Patient UK.
Want to advertise on this site? Find out how >>
Here you can follow a link to view existing patient experiences on this subject, or to add your own
This will offer you the usual PDF options i.e. document navigation, search, zoom and formatted print
Note: this is the best way to print the document
Note: this will open in a new window
Note: this will open in a new window
Here you can follow a link to view existing patient experiences on this subject, or to add your own
This will offer you the usual PDF options i.e. document navigation, search, zoom and formatted print
Note: this is the best way to print the document
Note: this will open in a new window
Note: this will open in a new window


